1. COLlaboration time survey
Everett Public Schools V1.2
3-way Comparison Report

2. Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc.
Since its founding nearly 125 years ago, Everett Public Schools has grown to serve 18,930 students living in the urban, suburban and rural neighborhoods of Everett and Mill Creek, Washington. The district educates students in 26 schools over a 39 square mile area that includes swaths of unincorporated Snohomish County.
Most of the district’s schools are located in the city of Everett. Everett’s population of 103,100 is ethnically diverse, and its residents are both younger (median age of 32) and more educated (84% high school graduates) than the national average. The city of Mill Creek, incorporated in 1983, has a population estimated at 18,450 living in 2,365 acres.
As of Oct. 1, 2013, 39.6% of the district’s students self-identified as non-white; 41.0% qualify for free or reduced lunch; 12.3% are enrolled in special education, and 10.2% qualify as transitional-bilingual (ELL) and speak 70 languages. The district employs more than 1,800 total staff; 924 are certificated teachers, of whom 61.4% hold a master’s degree or above.
The Center for Educational Effectiveness (CEE) is a service, consulting, and research organization dedicated to the mission of partnering with K-12 schools to improve student learning.
NOTICE
The Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. (CEE) makes substantial effort to ensure the accurate scoring, analysis, and reporting of the results of the Educational Effectiveness Survey. However, CEE makes no warranty of any kind with regard to this material, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. CEE shall not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material.
No part of these materials may be copied, reproduced, republished, posted, modified, edited, transmitted, distributed, or used to create derivative works in any form or by any means without the prior written consent of Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc.  These materials are copyright protected under U.S. and international copyright laws and treaties.  Violation of these laws will lead to prosecution.
 Trademark notice: Center for Educational Effectiveness™ and affiliated logo, Better Data. Better Decisions. Better Schools.™ and affiliated logo, Educational Effectiveness Survey™, EES-Leadership 360™ are all trademarks of Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc.  All other trademarks cited here are the property of their respective owners.
Published by:
Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc.
© 2013 Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Printed in the U.S.A.
Contact Information: Phone:
Fax:

3. 3-Way Comparison Report
This report supplements your main Collaboration Time Survey reports and provides a 3-way comparison of results.
Collaboration Time Survey
This page summarizes your results on the Collaboration Time Survey for each of the scales.
As you look at these categories do you see one or two that indicate real strength as represented in significant green? Do you see one or two that lean more toward the negative values of orange and red? To further understand the meaning of this data you will need to review the breakdown of the individual items which comprise each of these categories. Those pages follow.

4. Summary View—Percent Positive Responses
This simple radar graph provides you with an overall comparison of positive responses. Recall that positive responses are the sum of “Almost Always True” and “Often True”.

5. Summary View—Mean Scores
While the overall summary view is important to consider, researchers often use mean scores – particularly when viewing results over time.

6. Focus on Collaboration

7. Focus on Learning

8. Focus on Results