Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Calderdale Joint Strategic Needs Assessment
Paula Holden & Pete Phillips
2
The Core Project Team Children and Young Peoples Services (Calderdale MBC) Head of Commissioning and Partnership Services Policy and Planning Officer Health and Social Care (Calderdale MBC) Director of Health and Social Care Information Analyst – Performance Information Public Health (NHS Calderdale) Deputy Director of Public Health Information Analyst – Public Health Head of Learning Disabilities and Mental Health Services Head of Older Peoples Services Information Analyst – Chief Executives Office Representative from the community forum
3
Project Timescales Scope of project and timescales agreed.
Meeting of information analysts to discuss available data and lists of available data produced Apr May Table of key data by locality produced and presented at Senior Management workshop and feedback gained Jun First draft of JSNA produced Jul Aug Dialogue Plan Developed Sept Final draft of JSNA dialogue document produced Oct Consultation/dialogue with stakeholders and Public Nov Dec Analysis of responses to dialogue process and gathering new data Final JSNA document produced Jan Feb Mar
4
Consultation and Involvement Why consult?
Address concerns of managers and other stakeholders rather than being driven by the data available To raise awareness Widen sense of ownership To demonstrate that it’s part of an ongoing process not simply a report To test its usefulness and areas for future development We had to focus on part of our JSNA process that we felt had gone well. We decided to look at the consultation and involvement process, so the next three slides describe the process in more detail. From the other presentations none of the other PCT/LA teams seemed to have conducted much of a consultation process
5
Consultation and Involvement The Process
Half day workshop in June to publicise project to senior managers in the Council and to gain feedback Feedback questionnaire was produced and circulated with dialogue document Dialogue document also available on web Opportunity for open comment to dedicated address
6
Consultation and Involvement Some of the groups consulted
Area Forums GALYIC Brunswick Centre –Sexual Health Calderdale Community Forum Halifax & District Irish Society Mental Health Partnership Board Learning Disabilities Partnership Board Children and Young Peoples Theme Group Joint CYPP/HSC Scrutiny Safer/Stronger Theme Group
7
Consultation and Involvement The Outcome
Identified lots of gaps Identified areas that needed more emphasis Some were able to be addressed and were added to the document Others have been deferred to be addressed later
8
SWOT Analysis – JSNA Process
Strengths Developed jointly Dialogue process Opportunities Commissioners more aware of available data Impetus towards joint information systems Threats Not used due to competing pressure Lack of ownership by other stakeholders Weaknesses No project manager Could have been more commissioning representation on project team Although we received many suggestions from you all on strengths/weaknesses etc, when we looked at the actual letter describing what was to be included it specified that the SWOT analysis should look at the process not the actual content. We struggled to think of suitable weaknesses with the project as the ones suggested were all related to content. Therefore we selected the fact that there was no project manager. On listening to the other presentations, most of the teams had a dedicated project manager. We also thought that as the document was expected to be mainly used by commissioners it may have been better if there was more commissioning input.
9
Gaps in Data Lifestyle and behavioural factors that relate to health
Physical and Sensory Disabilities Mental health – Lack of robust local data Prevalence of chronic conditions such as multiple sclerosis More detailed analysis of residents concerns/priorities/aspirations Linkage of health issues with crime e.g. impact of alcohol Gay and lesbian issues
10
Areas for support from PHO/IC
Lifestyle survey Adults and children and young people Standard questions across region/England to allow comparisons Develop best practice guidance Promoting culture of data use Interpret and apply findings of JSNA Practical examples We had to think of a couple of areas in which we would like support from the PHO. We selected lifestyle surveys because we felt that many areas would be in the same position with a lack of reliable data and it would make sense for the PHO to co-ordinate something so that the questions were standard and could be compared across areas. The other thing we selected was around promoting a culture of data use in commissioners and also training in understanding data.
11
Further Work Data Warehouse/Observatory Lifestyles Survey
Web based system holding key data at sub district level Initial meeting arranged for Mid April Resource implications Lifestyles Survey Huge gap in information In house FORMIC questionnaires service Response rates could be problem Comparison data? We have to think of a project that we would like to spend the grant on that can be conducted over the summer. We mentioned two potential projects. Currently it is not binding and we are free to change our ideas. However they are expecting us to do a presentation on the project we wish to do for the meeting on the 30th April and I would assume by then that they would expect us to go ahead with the project we’ve presented on. It would be useful if this could be discussed and agreed at the meeting we’re having on the 21st.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.