Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClement Jefferson Modified over 6 years ago
1
Changing the Outcome: Achieving and Sustaining a Safe Reduction in Foster Care: A Policy Institute November 4-6, 2009 Tampa, FL Setting the Course: Unpacking the Data (Ramblings from the Left Coast) Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department of Social Services and the University of California at Berkeley, and is supported by the California Department of Social Services and the Stuart Foundation
2
tracking child welfare outcomes
rate of referrals/ substantiated referrals home-based services vs. out of home care reentry to care permanency through reunification, adoption, or guardianship counterbalanced indicators of system performance use of least restrictive form of care length of stay positive attachments to family, friends, and neighbors stability of care Source: Usher, C.L., Wildfire, J.B., Gogan, H.C. & Brown, E.L. (2002). Measuring Outcomes in Child Welfare. Chapel Hill: Jordan Institute for Families,
3
three data views data
4
the view matters… How long do children stay in foster care?
January 1, 2008 July 1, 2008 December 31, 2008 Source: Aron Shlonsky, University of Toronto (formerly at CSSR) 4
7
The California Experience
University/Agency collaboration Publicly available reports since 1994, online since 2000 Nationally mandated measures (CFSR) State mandated measures (California Outcomes and Accountability System—AB636 law since 2001) Enhancements and additional measures Dynamic, user defined drill down and breakout functionality All tables refreshed quarterly Data over time, for California and each of the 58 counties Presentations, tools, etc.
8
public data: putting it all out there
pros: greater performance accountability community awareness and involvement, encourages public-private partnerships ability to track improvement over time, identify areas where programmatic adjustments are needed County/County and County/State collaboration cons: potential for misuse, misinterpretation, and misrepresentation available to those with agendas or looking to create a sensational headline misunderstood data can lead to the wrong policy decisions “Torture numbers, and they’ll confess to anything” Gregg Easterbrook
9
how’s it working for us? Publicly available data for child welfare has become business as usual State, county, and UCB are able to respond quickly and thoroughly to data abuse/number torturing Most outcome measures are improving over time
12
CSSR.BERKELEY.EDU/UCB_CHILDWELFARE
Barbara Needell CSSR.BERKELEY.EDU/UCB_CHILDWELFARE Needell, B., Webster, D., Armijo, M., Lee, S., Dawson, W., Magruder, J., Exel, M., Glasser, T., Williams, D., Zimmerman, K., Simon, V., Putnam-Hornstein, E., Frerer, K., Cuccaro-Alamin, S., Winn, A., Lou, C., & Peng, C. (2009). Child Welfare Services Reports for California. Retrieved July 1, 2009, from University of California at Berkeley Center for Social Services Research website. URL: < Presentation Developed by Emily Putnam-Hornstein and Christine Wei-Mien Lou 12
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.