Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCoral Avis Townsend Modified over 6 years ago
1
Alaska Dept. Transportation and Public Facilities
Unknown Bridge Foundations: Pile Length Testing and Scour Vulnerability Alaska Dept. Transportation and Public Facilities Hiram Henry August, 2016
2
Scour at Unknown Bridge Foundations
Managing U-Bridges Scour Vulnerability Evaluations Pile Length Testing for Embedment Depth
3
Alaskan U-Bridges 1000 Publicly-travelled bridges (roughly)
50 Unknown Foundations (5 %) Coded “U” per NBI Item #113 Scour Plan of Action required
4
Scour Estimates Joint Funding Project: USGS Alaska DOT&PF Field Survey
HEC-RAS Model HEC-18 Scour Est.
7
Foundation Puzzle
8
Foundation Puzzle
9
Known vs. Mystery KNOWN Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics
10
Known vs. Mystery KNOWN Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics
Scour Depth Estimate
11
Known vs. Mystery KNOWN Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics
Scour Depth Estimate Desired Embedment Below Scour Required Tip Elevation
12
Known vs. Mystery KNOWN MYSTERIES… Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics
Scour Depth Estimate Desired Embedment Required Tip Elevation MYSTERIES…
13
Known vs. Mystery KNOWN MYSTERIES Pile Length Basin Hydrology
Channel Hydraulics Scour Depth Estimate Desired Embedment Required Tip Elevation MYSTERIES Pile Length
14
Known vs. Mystery KNOWN MYSTERIES Pile Length Embedment Post-Scour
Basin Hydrology Channel Hydraulics Scour Depth Estimate Desired Embedment Required Tip Elevation MYSTERIES Pile Length Embedment Post-Scour Scour Vulnerability
15
Pile Length Testing EDAR – Effective Dispersion Analysis of Reflection
Non-Destructive Test of Pile Length Mobile Equipment Research by North Carolina State University, Dept. Civil Eng. Murthy Gudatti, PE, PhD Vivek Samu, PhD Candidate Funded by Alaska DOT&PF and FHWA
16
Lab Development Control Pile: Length known Substrate known
EDAR test #1: Length Seismic Testing: Pile Failure EDAR test #2: Failure depth
17
EDAR Equipment Accelerometers Signal Processor Tablet PC Hammer
18
Old Ideal Concept Strike pile with hammer
Longitudinal Wave: Reflects from pile tip Accelerometer: Measures reflection travel time Length = ½ Time * Velocity Pile
19
Reality Chaotic, Noisy Waves Must strike top of pile (inaccessible)
Multiple signals Echoes Resonance Must strike top of pile (inaccessible) Error beyond usefulness Pile
20
EDAR Strike side of pile (exposed) Flexural wave is dispersive
Algorithms must filter and identify reflections Error Decreased Pile
21
Longitudinal Signal (theoretical)
time Flexural Signal Pile
22
EDAR
23
EDAR – Preliminary Results
Preliminary length estimate error at known piles (%): Goal (%) +/- 10 Laboratory (%) +/- 5 Field Test (%) +/- 10 Accuracy improved with Temoshenko Beam Theory. (Wilmington, NC Field Test) Confidence Level Upper Limit (m) Lower Actual Length (m) Limit Error (%) 95 11.56 9.31 10.85 6.57 -14.16 90 11.37 9.5 4.81 -12.38 80 11.15 9.78 2.83 -10.4
24
EDAR - Development Timeline
Theory and Laboratory 2015 – Present (North Carolina) Field Tests and Validation – Known Piles 2016 Spring – Fall (Alaska and NC) Implementation – Unknown Foundations 2017 Spring – Alaskan Unknown Foundations
25
Questions ?
26
Pile Types for Testing Steel Pipe – Concrete filled (Primary For Testing) H-Piles – Very Common Timber – Common but Irregular Properties Railroad Three-Rail
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.