Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Design Project #1 Prof. Berezniak Presented to: Spring 2017

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Design Project #1 Prof. Berezniak Presented to: Spring 2017"— Presentation transcript:

1 Design Project #1 Prof. Berezniak Presented to: Spring 2017
Replacement of Vehicle Bridge over Puddintown Road, College Township, PA Introduction to Engineering design EDSGN 100 Section 001 Team E-MRDJ Engineering Masters (by) Reliable Design Jobs Team 2 Andrew DeLuca Dalal Malallah Erica Salvo Mariah Alfaraj Presented to: Prof. Berezniak Spring 2017

2 Statement of the problem
A flood destroyed a bridge that is located on Puddintown Road, College Township, PA. The bridge was a connection point to Mount Nittany Medical Center Vital lifeline vehicles must take a lengthy detour, putting the students and faculty at major risk Significant traffic increase

3 Project Objective PennDOT initiated an emergency
Design a new bridge to replace the one destroyed in the flood Must be done is fast, cost-efficient manner

4 Required design criteria
Howe Truss bridge Warren Truss bridge

5 Warren Phase 1: Economic Efficiency
-Cost was minimized by using carbon steel bars instead of Tempered steel. -Reducing the size also reduced the cost. - Final cost $236,764.89

6 Warren Phase 2: Structural Efficiency Load / mass of the bridge
Structural efficiency was (highest) lowest was Average structural efficiencies = Load weight that our bridge heald = 76 lbs Failed: overload on one joint

7 Howe Phase 1: Economic Efficiency Total Cost: $256,047.65
13 carbon steel tubes ( more expensive), 28 carbon steel bars

8 Howe Phase 2: Structural Efficiency
Member 31 in the simulation was the most “at risk” for failure with for tension. Weight = 84.6 grams Load at Failure = grams

9 The Best Solution Warren is the better option for bridge type because it is the most cost and structure efficient; $19, less to build. Means for the overall warren versus truss are significantly lower for the Warren, so not only did our experiment prove the Warren is successful, but our class as a whole.

10 Our Conclusions The goal was to provide a design of of a truss bridge that meets that is both cost and structural efficient, and to do it fast. Both the digital design and the model showed that the warren truss is best.

11 Our Recommendations We recommend to build the Warren model which is proven to meet the required criteria. Consider a change on the overloaded joint.


Download ppt "Design Project #1 Prof. Berezniak Presented to: Spring 2017"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google