Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClyde Ellis Modified over 6 years ago
1
Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Associated with Acute Myeloid Leukemia with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 Fusion
Adam J. Wood, D.O. Rhett P. Ketterling, M.D. April E. Chiu, M.D. Kaaren K. Reichard, M.D. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
2
Clinical History 26-year-old male in good health prior to 2/2015 when he presented with constitutional symptoms: Fevers Nausea Vomiting Weakness with ↓ energy Night sweats 50 lb. weight loss
3
Clinical History Con’t
2/2015 4/2015 9/2015 Blood Chemistries (normal values) AST (8-48) U/L 1017 3158 1176 ALT (7-55) U/L 909 1039 579 Alk phos (45-115) U/L 182 508 338 Tbili (≤1.2) md/dL 0.5 6.7 1.8 CBC (normal values) Hgb ( ) mg/dL 14.2 WBC ( ) x 109/L 1.1 1.3 ANC ( ) x 109/L 0.55 0.37 PLTS ( ) x 109/L 82 197 130 •↑ LFTs •Cytopenias •↑ ferritin (7614 μg/L)
4
Clinical History Con’t
Gastrointestinal work-up: Biochemical abnormalities suggestive of Wilson’s disease No Kayser-Fleischer rings Liver biopsies did not reveal copper accumulation Negative infectious disease work-up Negative CT imaging with no significant lymphadenopathy
5
Clinical History Con’t
10/2015: Hematology suggested bone marrow (BM) biopsy due to 8 months of persistent unexplained constitutional symptoms & cytopenias
6
Morphologic Findings-Peripheral Blood
CBC: pancytopenia Hgb 12.7 g/dL RBC 4.21 x 1012/L MCV 88.1 fL RDW 17.7% WBC 0.6 x 109/L PLT 98 x 109/L Smear: rare circulating tumor cell (inset)
7
Morphologic Findings-BM Aspirate
Markedly ↑ BM histiocytes
8
Morphologic Findings-BM Aspirate Con’t
Marked hemophagocytosis
9
Morphologic Findings-BM Aspirate Con’t
Scattered atypical tumor cells
10
Morphologic Findings-BM Aspirate Con’t
Very rare single, thin, Auer rod identified
11
Morphologic Findings-BM Aspirate Con’t
Morphologic spectrum of tumor cells, with (A, B) & without (C, D) Auer rods
12
Morphologic Findings-BM Aspirate Con’t
Normal (A) & atypical (B-D) megakaryocytes
13
Morphologic Findings-BM Biopsy
CD34 Hypocellular with panhypoplasia ↑ CD34+ blasts (20-30%) differentially distributed in the interstitium
14
Morphologic Findings-BM Biopsy Con’t
Blasts with notched nuclei, stippled chromatin & mitosis
15
Morphologic Findings-BM Biopsy Con’t
CD68 Markedly ↑ hemophagocytic histiocytes
16
Morphologic Findings-BM Biopsy Con’t
CD61 No significant population of small, atypical megakaryocytes
17
↑ population of CD34+ blasts
Immunophenotype ↑ population of CD34+ blasts
18
Immunophenotype Con’t
Blasts express: CD34, CD45 (dim), CD13 (dim), CD33, CD117, HLA-DR, CD7 (partial), CD56 & CD38
19
Cytogenetics-Conventional Chromosome Study
Normal
20
Cytogenetics-FISH Within normal limits for KAT6A (MYST3) & CREBBP gene regions Within normal limits for PML & RARA gene regions
21
Cytogenetics-FISH Con’t
RUNX1T1-RUNX1 fusion in 47% of interphase nuclei Normal FISH result on multiple normal metaphases
22
Molecular Studies PML-RARA mRNA analysis, peripheral blood: Negative
Next generation sequencing results, bone marrow: WT1: c.938dup; p.Ala314Glyfs*3 (10%)
23
Proposed Diagnosis Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion & normal karyotype
24
Follow Up Further investigation into the patients PMHx revealed a BM biopsy was performed 4/7/15: Low normal cellular marrow with variable dyspoiesis primarily involving the myeloid & megakaryocytic lineages, mild to moderate reticulin fibrosis, & mildly increased myeloblasts Flow cytometric analysis: ↑ in CD34/CD117 positive hematopoietic progenitor cells (5-6%) with expression of HLA-DR, CD13, CD33 & aberrant CD56 Of uncertain significance Special stains for AFB & fungal organisms were negative
25
Follow Up Con’t Treatment:
Solu-Medrol for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis Induction chemotherapy with MEC Occasional fevers, but liver function tests normalized & has had continued improvement in weakness & fatigue Bone marrow biopsies (10/29/15 & 11/13/15): No increase in blasts No features of hemophagocytosis
26
Interesting Features It is unusual to see a case of AML associated with frank hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis This phenomenon is different from that seen in AML with t(8;16)(p11.2;p13.3), KAT6A(MYST3)-CREBBP fusion, in which the blasts themselves demonstrate erythrophagocytosis1 In this case, the hemophagocytosis was an entirely different process
27
Interesting Features Con’t
Blasts versus lymphoma Initially there was a cytologic diagnostic dilemma Particularly in light of the presence of hemophagocytosis & only exceedingly rare apparent Auer rods Flow cytometric findings confirmed blasts & excluded lymphoma
28
Interesting Features Con’t
Normal karyotype but FISH positive for RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion with a FISH signal pattern consistent with a balanced t(8;21)(q22;q22) The expected balanced FISH signal pattern in the interphase nuclei strongly suggests this is not a cryptic translocation which indicates the normal chromosome result is distinctly unusual In our practice we do not routinely perform FISH for abnormalities that are not known to be cytogenetically cryptic In this case, it was only an afterthought to order FISH for t(8;21) after we discovered that the tumor cells were in fact blasts (& not lymphoma), were negative for the t(8;16), had single, thin Auer rods & expressed CD562,3 The lack of a t(8;21) AML clone to divide in a BM chromosome study is extremely unusual & suggests that the BM milieu was such that the blasts were inhibited from dividing
29
References Haferlach et al. Leukemia 2009;23:934-43.
Hurwitz et al. Blood 1992;80: Swerdlow et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4th edition.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.