1. Comparison of hand contamination rates and environmental contamination levels between two different glove removal methods and distances 
Joanna Y.F. Lai, MS, Y.P. Guo, PhD, Peggy P.L. Or, MS, Yi Li, PhD 
American Journal of Infection Control 
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (March 2011)
DOI: /j.ajic
Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
FPs on the edge of the rubbish bin cover (A) and on the rubbish bin cover (B).
American Journal of Infection Control  , DOI: ( /j.ajic )
Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2 Fluorescent solution (10 mL) sprayed on a subject’s palms.
American Journal of Infection Control  , DOI: ( /j.ajic )
Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3 Flowchart of the study procedure.
American Journal of Infection Control  , DOI: ( /j.ajic )
Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
Small patches of fluorescent stain (A) and HCW rankings (B) on the front of the cloth for pretest and posttest of the CDC glove removal demonstration. NS, not significant. ∗P < .05; ∗∗P = .01.
American Journal of Infection Control  , DOI: ( /j.ajic )
Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Terms and Conditions

6. Fig 5
Glove removal times for the pretest and posttest periods. ∗∗∗P < .001.
American Journal of Infection Control  , DOI: ( /j.ajic )
Copyright © 2011 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Terms and Conditions