1. JTAMS PRE-CDR IT/SIS ANALYSIS
19 October FY 3
PM JTAMS / PM JUGGERNAUT
Student Name:
Student Name:
PM JTAMS Lead
PM JUGGERNAUT Lead
Presentation Intro/Overview
Key Software-related Questions for CDR
Measures Assessment
Data Rights Analysis
Award Fee Criteria Analysis (JTAMS)
Juggernaut’s Award Fee Analysis
Software Development Planning
AMRU’s Development Approach
MRES Risk Assessment
MRES Measures Assessment
PRACTICUM 3
Note: P1 and P2 we are Milestone centric and P3 is CDR focused.
Student Instructions:
Each team will develop the practicum solution slide package using the templated slides provided, the given scenario/artifacts –additional info is in the Job Aids folder.
All slides will be submitted to the instructors electronically (Blackboard/Shared Drive) and hard copy (printed 2 slides per page and double sided)
Each team will designate a PM’s to present the results of the analysis prepared by the team.
You will have 1.5 hours for research and development of the practicum solution. The PM and Deputy PM will have 5 minutes to present their designated slides.
Summary – Are We Ready for CDR? (Joint Brief)

2. Key Software-Related Questions for CDR
Requirements Management: 1. 2. 3.
PM JTAMS SITUATION WITH RESPECT TO REQUIREMENTS
PRACTICUM 3
See: Job Aids\Technical Review
Also use the NOTE document in the TECHNICAL REVIEW FOLDER.
NOTE: Research the DoD CDR Checklist for Requirements Management and identify three (3) key questions. (Any 3 key questions can be chosen; explain why you picked the ones you did) Identify software-related questions appropriate for the Critical Design Review (CDR). Relate specifically what is required to the JRATS-JTAMS scenario - the student instructions explain the current situation w/ respect to potential NEW requirements
EXPLAIN WHY YOU CHOSE THOSE QUESTIONS AND HOW THEY RELATE TO PM JTAMS SITUATION

3. Key Software-Related Questions for CDR
Management metrics relevant to life cycle phase: (Latest Cost Estimate)
CDR Question
Answer and Discussion
Has the software cost estimate been updated based upon actual measured project software development performance and productivity to date? If not, what are the implications?
Has cost of acquiring, licensing and configuring COTS and / or GOTS computer hardware and software been considered? Was this included in the original estimate? Identify any implications
What caused (or could be the cause of) a change in the software cost since the beginning of the project, if any? (based on the current scenario)
PRACTICUM 3
See: Job Aids\Technical Review
Also use the NOTE document in the TECHNICAL REVIEW FOLDER.
NOTE: Apply the questions identified to the JTAMS scenario. You may have to refer back to the cost estimating portions of Practicums 1 and 2. See the Cost Factor Cheat sheet (used in Lesson 3) for review of cost factors.

4. JTAMS MEASURES ASSESSMENT
Summarize your analysis
Worksheet #2
Problems: Summarize the problems in the areas of: JRATS External Interfaces; JTAMS Subsystem Interfaces; Rgmnts Volatility; Defects by Priority
Impacts: Describe the root causes and assess the potential impacts. Include the implications for Software Quality.
PRACTICUM 3
See: Job Aids\Measures\JTAMS Measures for section 3
Instructions:
1.Review the set of measures and identify issues.
2.Do an integrated analysis. Perform a causal analysis to identify root causes and underlying problems. Provide a summary for the two or three major issues, describing the problems, impacts, risks, potential outcomes, and alternatives. Document your analysis on Worksheet #2.
Alternatives
Describe the alternative courses of action you would recommend for this project.

5. Real-time Engine Data Rights Analysis#
COA
Cost ($)
Schedule DR
(R, GP, U)
Risk and Risk level
(L, M, H) 1
Challenge the V-Robotics assertion (do nothing) 2
Negotiate for Government Purpose Rights 3
Develop the Real-time software engine to support MRES 4
Accept Juggernaut’s assertion and agree to the limited rights associated 5
Allow another contractor to do the work 6
(Student Provided COA – required)
Which option is the best from a Government perspective and why?
Which option is best from Juggernaut’s perspective and why?
Which option is your recommended option and why?
PRACTICUM 3
See: Job Aids\Data Rights
Instructions: Identify and assess COA’s for addressing the data rights issue - for the real-time engine. You are required to develop another COA – row 6 on the slide.
There is data in the contract that can give you cost and schedule impacts for some of the COA’s - estimate or use the H/M/L approach if you do not have cost or schedule information
Do not just identify risk as H/M/L – explain the factors that went into your risk assessment – what is the risk, etc?
Use the lesson material from lesson 16 and any references for that lesson to understand “Restricted Rights” “Government Purpose Rights” and “Unlimited Rights”:
Identify the risks the Government might incur – for instance:
Schedule and Cost risk of acquiring data rights versus cost risk of not acquiring data rights
Assess the risks to the program and to the acquiring Service/Agency of not acquiring the desired product data or data rights due to cost or other considerations.
Explore alternatives for acquiring the needed data rights for life cycle support from the OEM.
Determine if, by not acquiring the data and rights, the program has locked the Government into a course of action that would be costly or impossible to change at a later date.

6. Award Fee Criteria Analysis (JTAMS)
Award Fee Weights For Period 1
(25 Jun FY2 After SRR)
6.1 Risk Management = .5
Why?
6.2 Configuration Management = .2
6.3 Interface Control =
6.4 Formal Inspections =
6.5? =
Award Fee Weights For Period 2 (16 Nov FY3 After PDR)
6.1 Risk Management =
Why?
6.2 Configuration Management =
Why?)
6.3 Interface Control =
6.4 Formal Inspections =
6.5? =
PRACTICUM 3
NOTE: PM Juggernaut was provided the Contract modification that added our Five Award Fee Areas
See: Job Aids\Contract
Refer to the updated scenario and to the contract information in the Job Aids
SEE JTAMS CONTRACT, SECTION H.6; AWARD FEE DETERMINATION
We have awarded a Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF) contract to JUGGERNAUT (See Job Aids) for the JTAMS effort. Using the contract, task 2 is to: (1) identify the Government Software Quality Performance Statement (Goals of Program); (2) given Section H and Section H.6.1 Risk Management Award Fee Determination (AFD) as an example, determine the Award Fee Area for Section H.6.2, H.6.3, and H.6.4 based on the criteria listed; (3) for Section H.6.5, you come up with your own Award Fee Area based on the Government Software Quality Goals; (4) Fill in the Award fee table weights for Contract Performance Period 1 (some already completed) and Contract Performance Period 2 and explain why you gave the areas the weights you did. See Contract in Job Aids.

7. JTAMS PRE-CDR IT/SIS ANALYSIS
19 October FY 3
PM JTAMS / PM JUGGERNAUT
PM JTAMS Lead
PM JUGGERNAUT Lead
Presentation Intro/Overview
Key Software-related Questions for CDR
Measures Assessment
Data Rights Analysis
Award Fee Criteria Analysis (JTAMS)
Juggernaut’s Award Fee Analysis
Software Development Planning
AMRU’s Development Approach
MRES Risk Assessment
MRES Measures Assessment
PRACTICUM 3
Note: P1 and P2 we are Milestone centric and P3 is CDR focused.
Summary – Are We Ready for CDR? (Joint Brief)

8. Juggernaut’s Award Fee Analysis
Section H.6.1 Risk Management
JSSD Plan to Support
PRACTICUM 3
ANSWER:
SEE JTAMS CONTRACT, SECTION H.6.1; RISK MANAGMENT

9. Software Development Plan
Identify the purpose and who produces the Software Development Plan. (SDP)
Provide an overview of AMRU’s approach to software development:
PRACTICUM 3
See: Job Aids\Software Development
See: Job Aids\ Measures\Agile - MRES Measures All of this comes directly from the AMRU Agile Software Development Approach White Paper
Identify the purpose and who produces the Software Development Plan. (SDP)
Provide an overview of AMRU’s approach to software development
Explain AMRU’s expected benefits or rationale for using this approach
Explain AMRU’s expected benefits or rationale for using this approach

10. AMRU’s approach to development
What concerns does the V-Robotics have concerning their subcontractor AMRU?
How is requirements management affected by AMRU's software methodology? How is requirements traceability affected by AMRU's software methodology?
PRACTICUM 3
See: Job Aids\ Measures\Agile - MRES Measures
The answers to question comes from a review of the s in the Job Aids
Answer the following questions concerning AMRU’s approach to development
What concerns does the V-Robotics have concerning their subcontractor AMRU?
How is requirements management affected by AMRU’s software methodology? How is requirements traceability affected by AMRU's software methodology?
MRES Risk Assessment: Assess the risks AMRU has identified.
Using the risk management cube methodology, identify 2 additional risks to JTAMS as a result of AMRU's software development approach
MRES Measures Analysis: Using the cumulative flow diagram contained in AMRU's release report, identify the work completed, work in progress and the work remaining on 8/1/02.

11. Question 3 - MRES Risk Assessment
Description of Risks
Question 3 - MRES Risk Assessment
Identify the risks AMRU has identified. Using the risk management cube methodology, discuss AMRUs likelihood and consequence assessment – then provide your own risk statement and assessment (place additional star on the cube(s)) - along with your rationale. (Note: see the Release Report).
Revised if-then statement
and rationale for “Star” placement
AMRU Identified Risks and Risk Cubes
Risk FY02-1
If-Then Stmt:
Rationale for “Star” placement on cube:
Risk FY02-13
If-Then Stmt
PRACTICUM 3
See: Job Aids\ Measures\Agile - MRES Measures The answers are included in the job aids. The intent is to explain your rationale for where you placed the risk assessment star on the risk cube.
Using the risk management cube methodology, discuss AMRUs likelihood and consequence assessment – then provide your own risk statement and assessment (place additional star on the cube(s)) - along with your rationale. (Note: see the Release Report).
Answer the following questions concerning AMRU’s approach to development
What concerns does the V-Robotics have concerning their subcontractor AMRU?
How is requirements management affected by AMRU’s software methodology? How is requirements traceability affected by AMRU's software methodology?
MRES Risk Assessment: Assess the risks AMRU has identified.
Using the risk management cube methodology, identify 2 additional risks to JTAMS as a result of AMRU's software development approach
MRES Measures Analysis: Using the cumulative flow diagram contained in AMRU's release report, identify the work completed, work in progress and the work remaining on 8/1/02.

12. Question 4 (MRES Risk Assessment)
Description of Risks
Question 4 (MRES Risk Assessment)
Using the risk management cube methodology, identify 2 additional risks to JTAMS as a result of AMRU's software development approach.
Likelihood / Consequence Assessment
2 Additional Risks / Statements
Rationale for “Star” placement
Risk 1
If-Then Stmt:
Risk 2
If-Then Stmt
Risk 1
Risk 2
Risk 1
Risk 2
Likelihood
Consequence
Likelihood
Consequence
PRACTICUM 3
See: Job Aids\ Measures\Agile - MRES Measures The answers are included in the job aids. The intent is identify some potential additional risks and explain the rationale for the risk assessments on the risk cube. The additional risks can be identified in the Job Aid “Programmatic Implications of AMRU CDRL Tailoring”
Answer the following questions concerning AMRU’s approach to development
What concerns does the V-Robotics have concerning their subcontractor AMRU?
How is requirements management affected by AMRU’s software methodology? How is requirements traceability affected by AMRU's software methodology?
MRES Risk Assessment: Assess the risks AMRU has identified.
Using the risk management cube methodology, identify 2 additional risks to JTAMS as a result of AMRU's software development approach
MRES Measures Analysis: Using the cumulative flow diagram contained in AMRU's release report, identify the work completed, work in progress and the work remaining on 8/1/02.

13. Question 5 (MRES Measures Analysis)
Using the cumulative flow diagram contained in AMRU's release report, identify the work completed, work in progress and the work remaining on 8/1/02.
AMRU Block 1 Implementation Progress
In-Progress
Work Complete
Work Remaining
PRACTICUM 3
See: Job Aids\ Measures\Agile - MRES Measures for Section 8
See the two job aids in the student files – Agile & Metrics presentation from SEI, and “How to Build a Cumulative Flow Diagram” .pdf for basics of how a cumulative flow diagram represents progress over time.
Answer the following questions concerning AMRU’s approach to development
What concerns does the V-Robotics have concerning their subcontractor AMRU?
How is requirements management affected by AMRU’s software methodology? How is requirements traceability affected by AMRU's software methodology?
MRES Risk Assessment: Assess the risks AMRU has identified.
Using the risk management cube methodology, identify 2 additional risks to JTAMS as a result of AMRU's software development approach
MRES Measures Analysis: Using the cumulative flow diagram contained in AMRU's release report, identify the work completed, work in progress and the work remaining on 8/1/02.

14. Summary – Are We Ready for CDR?
Completion of the CDR should provide the following:
(1) An established system initial product baseline
Status:
(2) An updated risk assessment for EMD
(3) An updated CARD (or CARD-like document) based on the system product baseline
(4) An updated program development schedule
(5) An approved Life-cycle Sustainment Plan
Government and Juggernaut Assessment:
Are we ready for CDR?
PRACTICUM 3
– (JOINT TASK GOV + CONTRACTOR) For this point in the development effort: Summarize our readiness for CDR. Read the Student Situation