Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDennis Griffith Modified over 6 years ago
1
Reduced Left Ventricular Compacta Thickness: A Novel Echocardiographic Criterion for Non-Compaction Cardiomyopathy Catherine Gebhard, MD, Barbara E. Stähli, MD, Matthias Greutmann, MD, Patric Biaggi, MD, Rolf Jenni, MD, MSEE, Felix C. Tanner, MD Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012) DOI: /j.echo Copyright © 2012 American Society of Echocardiography Terms and Conditions
2
Figure 1 Representative example of echocardiographic measurements in the parasternal short-axis view in a patient with LVNC (A) compared with one with AVS (B). C, compacted myocardial layer; N, noncompacted myocardial layer. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography , DOI: ( /j.echo ) Copyright © 2012 American Society of Echocardiography Terms and Conditions
3
Figure 2 Three-dimensional full-volume acquisition of the left ventricle. (A) Measurement of left ventricular wall thickness at the midventricular level in a transverse plane placed perpendicular to the ventricular long axis. (B) Measurement of left ventricular wall thickness at the midventricular level in a transverse plane tilted by 20° relative to the ventricular long axis. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography , DOI: ( /j.echo ) Copyright © 2012 American Society of Echocardiography Terms and Conditions
4
Figure 3 (A) Bar graph comparing left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS (∗P < .001). (B) Bar graph comparing left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS (∗P < .001). (C) Bar graph comparing septal wall thickness in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS (∗P < .0001). (D) Bar graph comparing indexed septal wall thickness in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS (∗P < .0001). Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography , DOI: ( /j.echo ) Copyright © 2012 American Society of Echocardiography Terms and Conditions
5
Figure 4 (A) Scatterplot comparing the ratio of indexed basal septal wall thickness (M-mode) to compacta thickness in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS. (B) Scatterplot comparing the ratio of indexed basal septal wall thickness (2D) to compacta thickness in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS. (C) Scatterplot comparing the ratio of indexed midventricular septal wall thickness (2D) to compacta thickness in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography , DOI: ( /j.echo ) Copyright © 2012 American Society of Echocardiography Terms and Conditions
6
Figure 5 (A) Scatterplot comparing total wall thickness in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS. (B) Scatterplot comparing the ratio of noncompacta to compacta in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography , DOI: ( /j.echo ) Copyright © 2012 American Society of Echocardiography Terms and Conditions
7
Figure 6 (A) Scatterplot comparing the thickness of noncompacta in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS. (B) Scatterplot comparing the thickness of compacta in patients with LVNC versus controls and patients with AVS. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography , DOI: ( /j.echo ) Copyright © 2012 American Society of Echocardiography Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.