Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Www.llinkslaw.com A Leading PRC Law Firm Foreign Investment Dispute Resolution Between Chinese and European Parties Peiming Yang 2016.10.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Www.llinkslaw.com A Leading PRC Law Firm Foreign Investment Dispute Resolution Between Chinese and European Parties Peiming Yang 2016.10."— Presentation transcript:

1 A Leading PRC Law Firm Foreign Investment Dispute Resolution Between Chinese and European Parties Peiming Yang

2 EU investment in mainland China

3 PRC Legal System mainland China Macao Taiwan Hong Kong Mainland
One Country Two System Mainland Hong Kong Macao Taiwan Dispute Resolution Methods: Litigation Arbitration ADR For convenience, the laws of mainland China hereinafter referred to as “PRC Laws”

4 Judicial Interpretation
The Legal Sources of PRC Arbitration System Law PRC Arbitration Law PRC Civil Procedural Law Judicial Interpretation Judicial Interpretation of PRC Arbitration Law Judicial Interpretation of PRC Civil Procedural Law Law Judicial Interpretation Multilateral Treaty Multilateral Treaty The New York Arbitration Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (“New York Convention”) Bilateral Treaty Bilateral Treaty Arrangements of the Supreme People’s Court on the Mutual Enforcement of Arbitral Awards between the mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

5 The Arbitration in mainland China
Arbitration Commission As of 2015, there are 244 arbitration commissions in mainland China. Arbitration Commission Arbitration Cases Disputed Amount The disputed amount of cases settled by arbitration commissions in mainland China in 2015 is billion RMB in total. Arbitration Cases The arbitration commissions in mainland China settled 136,924 cases in 2015. Disputed Amount The Arbitration in mainland China

6 The Arbitration Commission in mainland China
Shanghai International Economic And Trade Arbitration Commission (“SHIAC”) 1 2 3 4 South China International Economic And Trade Arbitration Commission (“SCIA”) China International Economic And Trade Arbitration Commission (“CIETAC”)

7 1 2 3 4 The Procedures under PRC Arbitration Law
Proceeding The arbitration proceeding is specified in the Arbitration Rules formulated by the Arbitration Commission. Confirmation of the validity of Arbitration Agreement If the Intermediate People’s Court confirms that the arbitration agreement is invalid, the arbitration shall be dismissed. 2 In principle, only procedural issues shall be examined and reviewed by the Intermediate People’s court. Application for the revocation of Arbitral Award 3 In principle, only procedural issues shall be reviewed. Application for the suspension of the enforcement of Arbitral Award 4 The Procedures under PRC Arbitration Law

8 The Arbitration Proceeding
Submission to Arbitration Commission for Arbitration B Acceptance of the Case C Formation of the Arbitral Tribunal D Oral Hearing E Arbitral Award The Arbitration Procedure of main Arbitration Commissions in mainland China is similar to that of international commercial arbitration institutions, such as ICC.

9 The reservation of public order
The Governing Law General principle The parties may explicitly choose the laws governing the foreign-related civil relationships, however only PRC Laws can be chosen as the governing law of domestic civil relationships. Note: The Equity Joint Venture, Cooperative Joint Venture and Wholly Foreign-owned Enterprise shall be regarded as PRC legal person. Principle The reservation of public order Where the rights and interests of the labors are related; Where the foreign exchange control or other financial safety issues are related; Where anti-monopoly or anti-dumping issues are related. If the application of foreign laws will damage the social public interests of mainland China, the PRC Laws shall apply. Public Order Mandatory provisions Chinese-foreign equity joint venture contract; Chinese-foreign contractual joint venture contract, or Contract for Chinese-foreign joint exploration and development of natural resources which is performed within the territory of the People's Republic of China If there are mandatory provisions on foreign-related civil relationships in the PRC Laws, these mandatory provisions shall directly apply. Mandatory Provisions

10 arbitration agreement
The Validity of Arbitration Agreement The Expression of Intention to Apply for Arbitration If litigation and arbitration are simultaneously chosen, such arbitration agreement will be invalid. 02 The Matters for Arbitration Contractual disputes and other disputes over proprietary right between equal parties may be arbitrated, except marriage, adoption, guardianship, support, succession disputes and other administrative disputes that shall be handled by administrative organs. 03 Validity of arbitration agreement The governing law of contract itself can not be automatically regarded as that of the arbitration agreement under the PRC Laws. The Governing Law of Arbitration Agreement The parties concerned may choose the governing law of the arbitration agreement. If the parties did not choose, the laws where the arbitration commission or the place of arbitration locates shall apply. 01 04 The Designated Arbitration Commission Only one arbitration Commission can be designated.

11 The Matters May Not Be Arbitrated
The disputes arising out of the administrative agreements The government franchised management and compensation agreement to the expropriation or requisition of land and buildings are explicitly defined as administrative agreements, and the disputes under such agreements shall be filed to Court for administrative litigation. The anti-monopoly disputes The anti-monopoly disputes arising out of the agreements such as distribution or patent royalty agreements cannot be arbitrated, even though both parties have equal status. Corporation dissolution dispute Although the Shareholders’ Agreement or the articles of association with the arbitration terms stipulates the conditions where the corporation shall be dissolved, corporation dissolution dispute can not be arbitrated.

12 Case Study 2015 2015 2016 The execution of the agreement 2012 2013
Party A (Distributor) and Party B (Producer) respectively entered into the distribution agreement in 2012 and According to such agreement, all the disputes arising out of the agreement shall be resolved by arbitration. 2015 Filing of the lawsuit Party A filed a lawsuit to Court against Party B due to its abuse of market dominant position and restrictive competitive behavior in the performance of the distribution agreement, and claimed for cease of infringement behavior and compensation. 2015 Jurisdiction Challenge Party B applied to Court for jurisdiction challenge of this case due to the arbitration agreement specified in the distribution agreement. 2016 The rejection to challenge The Court rejected Party B’s jurisdiction challenge, and held that the anti-monopoly disputes shall not be arbitrated.

13 Case Study 2005 The establishment of the joint venture company Party A, Party B, and Party C established a joint venture company in 2005, and entered into the Joint Venture Agreement. According to this Agreement, the Company shall be dissolved under specific circumstances. 2008 Application for arbitration Party B and Party C jointly submitted to CIETAC for arbitration against Party A according to the arbitration agreement specified in the Joint Venture Agreement, and claimed for the dissolution of the company. 2009 The arbitral award The arbitral tribunal awarded the dissolution of the company. 2011 The revocation of the arbitral award Party A applied to the Court for revocation of the arbitral award, and the Supreme People’s Court held that the corporation dissolutions are not arbitrable, and ruled the revocation of the arbitral award.

14 Mediation Procedure before Arbitration
Sample I Sample II In the event of a dispute arising in connection with the Agreement, the parties shall seek settlement of the dispute by mediation first. If the dispute cannot be settled by mediation within 30 days, the parties may submit to [ ] for arbitration. In the event of a dispute arising in connection with the Agreement, the parties shall seek settlement of the dispute by mediation first. If the dispute cannot be settled by mediation, the parties may submit to [ ] for arbitration. If a mediation before arbitration and some specific procedures such as the term of the mediation are stipulated, the parties shall conform such procedures, otherwise the arbitration award maybe revoked by courts.

15 Ad Hoc Arbitration Ad Hoc Arbitration in mainland China
Domestic Arbitration PRC Arbitration Law only admits institutional arbitration, which means domestic disputes cannot be arbitrated by ad hoc arbitral tribunal. Foreign-related Arbitration According to New York Convention, a court shall decide whether or not to recognize and enforce the arbitral award ruled by ad hoc arbitration tribunals beyond the territory of the PRC.

16 Valuation Adjustment Agreement
The Disputes Between Chinese and European Parties A The disputes arising out of transaction contract entered into during the establishment of a corporation, such as the equity joint venture contract and shareholders’ agreement. The shareholders’ right to know The objection to resolutions The disputes arising out of a contract which is entered into during the business activities C B The disputes arising out of the management of the corporation Call Option Agreement Valuation Adjustment Agreement

17 01 02 The Valuation Adjustment Agreement Valid Invalid
The valuation adjustment agreement among shareholders is valid under the PRC Law. 02 The validity of the valuation adjustment agreement between the shareholder and the target company may be challenged. Valid Validity Valuation Adjustment Agreement Courts and arbitral tribunals hold different opinions on the validity of the valuation adjustment agreement between the shareholder and the target company. The People’s Court holds: The Arbitral Tribunal holds: The valuation adjustment agreement between the shareholder and the target company is valid, because it is agreed by parties through friendly negotiation. The valuation adjustment agreement between the shareholder and the target company is invalid due to violation of the mandatory provisions of PRC Company Law, Invalid

18 The Call Option Agreement
The call option agreement is valid under the PRC Law. The enforcement of call option agreement is difficult due to the prerequisite of MOFCOM’s approval of transfer of shares. According to the modification of PRC Wholly Foreign-owned Enterprises Law, the administrative approval system has been changed into record-filing system.

19 Confirmation of the invalidity of the resolution
The Objection to Resolution The resolution of Shareholder Meeting and Board Meeting (“Resolution”) shall be invalid if violating the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations. The limitation of action to above litigation is 2 years. Confirmation of the invalidity of the resolution If the procedure of deciding resolution violates the articles of association, the resolution may be revoked. The application for revocation must be filed to courts, within 60 days from the day when company resolution is made. Revocation of the resolution

20 Shareholder’s Right to Know
The Shareholder’s Right to Know The exercise manners of the shareholder’s right to know The scope of the shareholder’s right to know Statutory scope provided by Article 33 or 99 of PRC Company Law Agreed scope provided by articles of association Limited Liability Company: review and duplicate Company limited by shares: review 1 2 Shareholder’s Right to Know Engagement of auditor Exception 3 4 The professional auditor can be engaged to review the company file for the shareholder. Only when the company has reasonable grounds to believe that shareholder reviewing the account is out of improper motivation, which may damage the legitimate interests of the company, the company has right to reject the shareholder’s request. If agreed by articles of association, the auditor can be engaged by the shareholder to audit the company.

21 Thanks!


Download ppt "Www.llinkslaw.com A Leading PRC Law Firm Foreign Investment Dispute Resolution Between Chinese and European Parties Peiming Yang 2016.10."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google