Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Long Lake management issues

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Long Lake management issues"— Presentation transcript:

1 Long Lake management issues
The Problem/s: Turbidity caused by Inorganic (TSS) and organic solids (TVS). Turbidity decreasing? Zebra mussels Notice the difference between Long Lake and other lakes in the slide . As of 2015 Long Lake experienced and algal bloom . Lake County Health Department ttracked the bloom across the season and determined that it represented a “potentially hazardous algal bloom or HAB. 2. The algal bloom resulted in in high turbidity and/or lack of water clarity. Turbidity is caused by both organic and inorganic particulates. It is measured by filtering the water sample and “gently “ drying it= TSS. Then the sample is put into an oven and heated to a high temperature. This burns off all of the organic part of the sample and this determines TVS or that part of the sample that is algae and other life forms. 3. Zebra mussels ironically can increase clarity. Lake Michigan has encountered close to 20 ft. of increased water clarity HOWEVER zebra mussels do not like the blue-green algal forms that can cause blooms. They can also mobilize phosphorus as a consequence of their filter feeding. Net result are blooms blue-green algae. They are SELECTIVE filter feeders. 4. Carp are bottom feeders that ROIL the bottom disturbing bottom sediments and putting them into the water column. They also disrupt native plant beds and potentially move system toward algal dominance. Long Lake Algal Bloom 2015 HAB Common Carp

2 Potential influences Round lake drain urban non-point
Eagle Creek Drain urban non-point Squaw Creek ag and urban non-point Baxter residential sewage ( point source ) Legacy loadings from previous STPs* Mud Lake ( intercepts P and sediment) Long Lake is on the Squaw Creek Watershed and the Round Lake Drain, and the Eagle Creek Drain. Total watershed >25,400 acres. Lake = 392 acres Ratio = 65 to 1

3 Anabaena sp. = Annie Aphanizomenon= Fanny Blue green algal bloom caused by “Annie, Fanny, and Mike Microcystis= mike

4 NOT NICE ! Say thank for your oxygen today however
Impact of Blue Green Algal Blooms: Temporarily closed down drinking water source on Lake Erie Increased turbidity Changes in fish food chains Changes in macroinvertebrates/aquatic insects Potential toxicity ( nuerotoxins and liver toxins) Suppress growth of “good” plants Interact with zebra mussels/ mussels can actually promote blue green blooms Negative impact on recreational fisheries Potential loss of recreational use….dependent on density Are found everywhere but size ( population numbers) matters NOT NICE ! Say thank for your oxygen today however

5 Size ( amount or concentration ) matters
Classes of Pollutants and Their Typical Origin Salt …. street run-off, winter de-icing ( avg. in county vs. USEPA standard) Metals ( Cu,Zn,Pb)….street runoff; sewage Nutrients ( P, NH3-N,NO3 )….Ag. Run-off, sewage, lawn fertilizers + legacy in bottom sediments BOD= Biological oxygen demand…..sewage treatment, animal waste Suspended Solids ( sediment)….Ag. Run-off, construction sites, bank erosion Volatile Organics ( special locations like gas stations PNAs (organics from street treatments)….driveway sealants Size ( amount or concentration ) matters

6 Phosphorus however drives basic productivity in lakes and is the most important nutrient which is responsible for blue-green algae blooms. Two ways to evaluate P : 1.) Concentration= weight/volume of liquid .05 mg/l is State Standard routinely violate state standard for all yrs avg. in surface = X state standard avg. below= X county avg. 10X s.s. Significant 2.) Load= total weight delivered to the lake / unit of time lbs. or kg /day for the whole lake lbs. or kg/ year for the whole lake loading determines concentration SIZE MATTERS

7 Squaw Creek/Long Lake Watershed & Water Quality Studies

8 2001 to 2004 Size matters Measured flow, water quality parameters
( weekly) including P and TSS Measured rainfall, evaporation, soil moisture land use, etc. Created detailed watershed model Total cost $500,000 Conclusions and significance: Annual load and discharge from Baxter similar to 1.5% of total 2. Principal load for Long Lake= internal load from historic STPs 3. Mud Lake mitigates or intercepts 35% to 85% of P and TSS dependent on flow 4. Model can be “updated” and used in future years Size matters

9 2001 to 2004 Conclusions of Stanley Eng. Study Size matters

10 2004 Size ( of watershed P and TSS) matters
Multiagency Management Plan Identified land use practices, green infrastructure, stream bank stabilization opportunities, flood control opportunities Multiple nutrient and sediment reduction efforts for both agricultural and urban land use Conservation plan for the watershed Conclusions and Significance: SMC has 34 conservation projects on watershed 25,250 acres means significant discharge to Long Lake Need to update Watershed Plan Need to validate yearly load assessments Size ( of watershed P and TSS) matters

11 2005 to 2016 Size and Origin of the Loading Matters for
Monitored water quality in upper and lower layers of lake No discernible trend in Total P or TSS Long Lake P limited in almost all years Avg. Water clarity decreased by close to a foot (2005 to 2015) Documented potential hazardous blue-green algal bloom ( 2015) Conclusions and Significance: Use impairment is increasing Management intervention is desirable Need to evaluate internal and external P loads Need to extend monitoring to the watershed and outlet Size and Origin of the Loading Matters for Framing Future Management…..Size Matters

12 2017 Standards violation TMDL analysis
July of 2017…engineering firm is doing analysis TMDL= 1. export from watershed model 2. and lake response model TMDL Analysis = amount of P loading that is required to meet the State Standards for Total P Long Lake State Standard

13 So What Needs to Happen ?

14 P Control Options: Analytic Options Aeration ( large scale)
Alum Treatment Hypolimnetic withdrawal Dredging Optimize wetland interception at Mud Lake Carp removal Optimize nutrient treatment across watershed Baxter sewage rerouting Analytic Options Scale up watershed water quality monitoring and analysis Update Baxter Watershed Model Update SMC Watershed Plan Obtain 319 Funds from IEPA and update TMDL analysis Prepare a Lake Management Plan Determine Internal Loading estimates w LCHD

15 Some lesser known residents of Squaw Creek/Long Lake
Orangespotted sunfish Lepomis humilis Bookmarks


Download ppt "Long Lake management issues"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google