Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Alternatives to Using a Reference Strip for Reflectance-Based Nitrogen Application in Corn (Presented at 8th International Conference on Precision Agriculture,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Alternatives to Using a Reference Strip for Reflectance-Based Nitrogen Application in Corn (Presented at 8th International Conference on Precision Agriculture,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Alternatives to Using a Reference Strip for Reflectance-Based Nitrogen Application in Corn (Presented at 8th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, July 2006) D. Kent Shannon Newell R. Kitchen Kenneth A. Sudduth Peter C. Scharf Harlan L. Palm

2 Alternative Approaches
Small Sample Area One Field Length Strip Multiple Field Length Strips – Interpolated into a Reference Map Using Soil Electrical Conductivity (EC)

3

4 Study Layout

5 Missouri Corn N Algorithm
Ratio Reference ≤ 0.25 60 ≤ N Rec ≤ 210

6 Small Sample Area Ratio =

7 One Field Length Strip Ratio =

8 Using Multiple Strips

9 Using Soil EC

10 Using Soil EC y = x R2 = C Site

11 C Site – N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0
C Site – N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 and Minimum N Rate of 60 lbs/acre Sample – R2 = 0.79 One Strip – R2 = 0.94 Multiple Strips Using EC – R2 = 0.94

12 W Site - N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0
W Site - N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 and Minimum N Rate of 60 lbs/acre Sample – R2 = 0.25 One Strip – R2 = 0.26 Multiple Strips Using EC – R2 = 0.35

13 Comparison of Sites – R2 Site Sample Strip EC B 0.69 0.63 NA C 0.79
0.94 D 0.70 0.48 0.60 E 0.61 H 0.64 S 0.80 W 0.30 0.31 0.35 Ceiling and 60 min

14 Comparison of Sites – Mean Nitrogen Rate in lbs/acre
Sample One Strip Multiple Strips EC B 188.35 160.96 187.69 NA C 189.08 172.03 177.64 174.82 D 146.76 99.02 149.66 114.73 E 105.56 107.17 101.07 H 121.51 129.51 126.98 S 115.02 113.57 125.79 W 146.10 158.87 170.99 161.14 Ceiling and 60 min

15 W Site – N Rec Ceiling Ratio Value of 0
W Site – N Rec Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 and Minimum N Rate of 60 lbs/acre Strip Ratio Mean St Dev 1 0.3353* 112.12 55.86 2 0.2166 143.66 58.40 3 0.2582* 4 0.22 140.13 58.81 5 0.1989 162.61 52.89 6 0.1761 186.04 37.94 All Variable 166.85 52.17 * Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 Used Using a Sample at the Beginning of Each Strip

16 Conclusions Spatial reference information is important for some fields. A sample reference is sufficient in some cases, but the location of the reference can be critical. We need to be able to determine where spatial information is most important.

17 Questions

18 W Site - N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0
W Site - N Rec Using Ceiling Ratio Value of 0.25 and Minimum N Rate of 60 lbs/acre Sample – R2 = 0.30 One Strip – R2 = 0.31 Multiple Strips Using EC – R2 = 0.35

19 Comparison of Sites – Standard Deviation
Sample Strip Multiple Strips EC B 24.14 36.17 23.46 NA C 41.54 51.37 44.23 49.15 D 49.58 49.22 50.07 51.71 E 44.28 44.41 46.22 H 32.12 31.43 36.09 S 40.73 40.50 46.06 W 49.66 45.6 43.15 41.37 Ceiling and 60 min River Bottom Fields

20 Missouri Corn N Algorithm

21 Missouri Corn N Algorithm


Download ppt "Alternatives to Using a Reference Strip for Reflectance-Based Nitrogen Application in Corn (Presented at 8th International Conference on Precision Agriculture,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google