Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWilfrid Cameron Modified over 6 years ago
1
Randomized Controlled Trials of Methotrexate & Mycophenolate in MG
Richard J. Barohn, MD Gary Gronseth, MD Chair, Department of Neurology Vice Chair, Department of Neurology Gertrude and Dewey Ziegler Professor of Neurology University Distinguished Professor Vice Chancellor for Research University of Kansas Medical Center Kansas City, KS
2
Mycophenolate Mofetil (CellCept)
Mechanism: select/rev cytostatic eff on T&B cells Early Studies Ciafaloni 2001 8/12 (67%) improved in 2 mos Chaudhry 2001 50% of 20 MG pts improved in 6-12 mos Cos 2000 59% of 29 MG pts improved in 6-12 mos Meriggioli et al 2003 85 pts-73% imp Blinded RCT-14 pts/5 months Rx MM-QMG imp 2.5 Plac-QMG imp 0.24 (p=0.30)
3
Mycophenolate Mofetil Rand/Control Trials in MG
Sanders & colleagues (MSG Neurology 2008;71:394) Investigator initiated funded by FDA-ODG Must be AChR-Ab pos No prior IS Rx 2.5 gm MM vs. plac All placed on pred 20 1o – QMG 3 mos 2o – MMT, MG-ADL AChR-Ab, SFEMG 80 subjects Aspreva sponsored-138 subjects (Sanders et al Neurol 2008;71:400) Can already be on prednisone 9 month trial
4
Mycophenolate Mofetil Rand/Control Trials in MG
Sanders & colleagues (MSG Neurology 2008;71:394) Aspreva sponsored-138 subjects (Sanders et al Neurol 2008;71:400) RESULTS FOR BOTH: NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE!
5
Mycophenolate Mofetil Rand/Control Trials Why Negative?
Drug does not work Prednisone improved all pts and masked MM effect Studies were not long enough Endpoints were not good enough Non-homogenous populations enrolled
6
Phase II Trial of Methotrexate in MG Barohn and Muscle Study Group FDA OPD R01 FD003538/IND #101,306
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study 50 patients 25 receiving MTX; 20mg/week 25 receiving placebo/12 mo study Hypothesis – adding MTX therapy will improve the MG manifestations so that prednisone dose can be reduced and clinical measures of MG severity will improve The primary measure of efficacy will be the 9-month prednisone area under the curve (AUC) Secondary: QMG, MG ADL, MG Comp, MG QOL15 20 sites – KUMC, UTSW, UTSCSA, UC-Irvine, OSU, U. North Carolina, U. Virginia, UCSF – Fresno, U. Miami, U. Indiana, MGH, CPMC, U. Iowa, Toronto, Phoenix, Methodist, NM Center Houston, Penn State, U. Florida, U. Toronto Conclusion: NEGATIVE STUDY Pasnoor M, He J, Herbelin L, Burns TM, Nations S, Bril V, Wang AK, Elsheikh BH, Kissel JT, Saperstein D, Shaibani JA, Jackson C, Swenson A, Howard JF, Goyal N, David W, Wichkund M, Pulley M, Becker M, Mozaffar T, Benatar M, Pazcuzzi R, Simpson E, Rosenfeld J, Dimachkie MM, Statland JM, Barohn RJ, The Methotrexate in MG Investigators of the Muscle Study Group. A Randomized controlled trial of methotrexate for patients with generalized myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2016; 87: PMCID:PMC
7
Neurology Jul 5;87(1):57-64. PMID: PMCID: PMC
8
MG MTX trial: Primary outcome Prednisone area under the curve
Intent-to-treat analysis using multiple imputation method Mean Prednisone dose in : Methotrexate group: ± Placebo : ± P-value : 0.14 Average daily prednisone dose Methotrexate group: ± 9.54 Placebo group: ± 7.82
9
MG MTX Trial: Secondary Outcome Measures
Methotrexate Mean change Placebo mean change Difference between Placebo and MTX P value QMG -1.6 ±3.5 .28 ± 4.5 1.88 0.08 MGMMT -5.6 ± 4.6 -3.7 ± 7.7 1.9 0.14 MGQOL -4.3 ±9.2 -4.8 ± 11.4 0.5 0.38 MGADL -1.4± 2.3 -0.26± 2.9 1.14 0.059 MG Composite -4.8 ±4.4 -2.5± 5.4 2.3 0.052 *Intent-to-treat analysis using multiple imputation
10
MG MTX Trial: Is it “Negative”? Why?
MTX/MMF do not work Prednisone probably works too well Difficult to do studies with patients on prednisone Underdose methotrexate High number of PBO drop outs Not enough patients (underpowered) Statistical handling of dropouts
11
MG MTX Trial: Is it “Negative”? Why?
Prednisone probably works too well Maybe hard to do MG studies with patients on prednisone Methotrexate does not work Underdose methotrexate High number of PBO drop outs Not enough patients (underpowered) Statistical handling of dropouts
12
My Rx Recommendations - prior to 2007 My Rx Recommendations – 2016
Myasthenia Gravis My Rx Recommendations - prior to 2007 1st Line: Tensilon Mestinon Prednisone Thymectomy 2nd Line: Azathioprine Mycophenolate Mofetil Cyclosporine 3rd Line: IVIg Plasmapheresis My Rx Recommendations – 2016 1st Line: Enlon Pyridostigmine Prednisone Thymectomy ! 2nd Line: Azathioprine Cyclosporine IVIg 3rd Line: Plasmapheresis Mycophenolate Mofetil Methotrexate 4th Line: Rituximab ? 5th Line: ? Cyclophosphamide ? Tacrolimus
13
Poor Internal Validity?
Study Risk of Bias Meriggioli 2003 MMF Class II MSG 2008 MMF Class I Sanders 2008 MMF Class I Pasnoor 2016 MTX Class I
14
Difference in Change in QMG
Imprecision? Meta-analysis MMF Pasnoor 2016 MTX Difference in Change in QMG Favors MMF or MTX Favors Placebo Difference in Daily Prednisone Use Sanders 2008 MMF Pasnoor 2016 MTX Favors MMF or MTX Favors Placebo
15
Poor External Validity?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.