Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Improving Supply Chain Agility of a Medical Device Manufacturer

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Improving Supply Chain Agility of a Medical Device Manufacturer"— Presentation transcript:

1 Improving Supply Chain Agility of a Medical Device Manufacturer
Authors: Xinye Bai and Yaniv Rosenberg Advisor: Dr. Daniel Steeneck MIT SCM Research Fest May 21, 2015

2 Agenda Introduction Motivation Instruments Supply Chain
Analysis findings Results - What hinders the Agility? Recommendations

3 The Sponsor Company Johnson & Johnson (J&J)
Global healthcare company divided into three sectors: Consumer Products, Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices & Diagnostics 2014 Annual sales of $74.3b Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., a franchise of J&J, manufactures orthopedic surgical implants.

4 Motivation $ $ $ Agile Supply Chain
Surgical instrument SKU proliferation – 12,000 Long lead time from suppliers – 10 weeks Short Lead Time to distributors – 48 hours Inaccurate forecast – MAPE = 65% High inventory levels, Costs – 5 times the annual cycle $ $ $ Supplier Strategies Distribution Strategies Inventory Strategies Agile Supply Chain Short Lead Times Low inventory Fast Response

5 Agility – Definition The ability to quickly respond to customers’ dynamic demand while keeping inventory levels and cost low. Virtual Agile Supply Chain Demand Sensitive Process Integration Network Based

6 Instrument Supply Chain
Information Flow Make to Order For the information flow, the order needs come from patients to supplier; And the products are manufacted from suppliers and make patients happy. This is the make to order supply chain. Material Flow

7 Problem / Opportunity Statement
Current Situations Goal Symptoms Lead time Average 8-12 weeks $250 Million 65% SKUs >one year of inventory 17% of slow mover 34% of fast mover Inventory Cost These three key things cause the problems of supply chain and hinder the agility. Let’s look What the symptom what makes this supply chain bad, We want to be doctor and let’s check the details – them we can let’s diagnoses. Lead time numbers are spread out almost uniformly from 20 days to 180, and then with lower occurrences, from 200 to 690 days, Backorders

8 Instrument Supply Chain
All the stages and their characters are complemented each other. Considering the long lead time Manufacturing Stage

9 Key Findings: Long Lead Time on Manufacturing process
10 Components …… Order Schedule Setup Manufacture Assemble J&J is not the only customer, capacity constrain; This is what the long lead time comes from. Because there is big problems on the setup scheduling. Let’s look two figure, 8 hours for set up but 10 min for manufacturing all. We have to wait for a longer time for each component before assembling, Nomally one instrument has 10 compoments. This is why the … lead time / inventory is high. Considering the capacity, that’s also the reason why supplier need MOQ. To balance MOQ and inventory 1 Day -5 Week 1 Day -10 Week Capacity constraints SKU manufacturing knowledge barrier Minimum of quantity (MOQ) requirements

10 Finding: Ordering Discrete Purchase Order: Orders are based on need. Lead time not in contract. Vendor Management Inventory (VMI) (70% of SKUs): Annual order. Forecast and current inventory levels are shared. DePuy has segmentation on the SKU and strategy to manage them. By supplier part, Don’t know when they receive the PO, and when receive the goods; don’t know how to control the flow DePuy don’t know when they receive the products. Suppliers don’t have commitment from DePuy on future orders, can’t plan allocate capacity .

11 Instrument Supply Chain
Planning Stage All the stages and their characters are complemented each other. Considering the long lead time

12 Finding: Order Management
PO and VMI are not Well Managed: VMI conditions not enforced. Order strategy is not aligned with SKU demand. PO, planner is blind to VMI:

13 MIT SCM ResearchFest May 22, 2014
Finding: Inaccurate Forecast Over forecasting MIT SCM ResearchFest May 22, 2014

14 Finding: Data Barrier No history data: New Products accounts for 50% budget Hard to Predict: 77% of 12,000 SKUs are legacy products. Leading to xxx, the scheduling, compensate. 77% SKUs

15 MIT SCM ResearchFest May 22, 2014
Findings – Ordering Practices Uncertain Ordering – cannot capture the real lead time. They don’t really Keep the log and acture data ; (reorder)- inaccurate and we cannt see the real situations. Reuse of existing POs – cannot capture lead time. Delay of orders to reach MOQ/discount thresholds. MIT SCM ResearchFest May 22, 2014

16 Instrument Supply Chain
Demand Stage All the stages and their characters are complemented each other. Considering the long lead time

17 Finding: High demand variation
High share of slow movers: 59% of SKUs are <5 units per month Orders pattern uncertainty: orders flow in a volatile manner Hard to predict Information Barrier: No Communications between Distributors; No visibility to inventory at distributors’ warehouses.

18 Instrument Supply Chain
All the stages and their characters are complemented each other. Considering the long lead time Inventory and Delivery Stage

19 Finding: Drivers of High Levels of Inventory
65% of the SKUs are with more than a year worth of supply Inaccurate forecast Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ)required by suppliers Lack of transshipment between distributors Lack of visibility across the supply chain Long lead time all com together, lack of responsness.carrying the intventory

20 Results – What Hinders Agility?
No visibility across partners No standard inventory management Communications Information Barriers Virtual Agile Supply Chain Volatile order flow VMI not managed No sales feedback Inaccurate forecast Demand Sensitive Process Integration Network Based No knowledge sharing No inventory sharing Material Flow Barriers

21 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management

22 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management

23 Build a Database of inventory at Distributors
Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory at Distributors D1 D2 D3 D4 ? ? ? ? DePuy

24 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory at Distributors Benefits Close monitor of real time usage. Advice Distributors on inventory management – orchestrate the supply chain. Validate orders Extend the visibility to all players D1 D2 D3 D4 Suppliers DePuy

25 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory at Distributors Transshipment – Replenishments between distributors One network vs. independent warehouses. Benefits: Second source of supply Reduced safety stock Fast response, high LOS Less inventory D1 D2 D3 D4 DePuy Yale T. Herer, Michal Tzur, Enver Yucesan (2002)

26 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory at Distributors Transshipment – Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy Benefit: No need for 37 safety stocks of 7,000 instruments. D1 D2 D3 D4 DePuy

27 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory at Distributors Transshipment – Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy Benefit: No need for 37 safety stocks of 7,000 instruments. Build a Database of inventory Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy DePuy D1 D2 D3 D4

28 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy Order instruments in product families Suppliers to identify families to minimize setup times Benefit: Reducing MOQ, will be applied at the group level Better forecast Lower inventory levels DePuy D1 D2 D3 D4

29 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy Order instruments in product families DePuy D1 D2 D3 D4

30 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy Order instruments in product families Dedicated capacity Benefits: Gain back in-house flexibilities Reduced lead time No capacity competition Lower unit cost How? Commitment on minimum order Smooth ordering flow DePuy D1 D2 D3 D4

31 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy Order instruments in product families Dedicated capacity Work with suppliers to eliminate/reduce MOQ Avoid working with one instrument suppliers DePuy D1 D2 D3 D4

32 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy Order instruments in product families Dedicated capacity Eliminate/Reduce MOQ Avoid working with one instrument supplier Order instruments in product families Dedicated capacity Benefits: Gain back in-house flexibilities Reduced lead time No capacity competition Lower unit cost (15%) How? Commitment on minimum order Smooth ordering flow DePuy D1 D2 D3 D4

33 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy SKU Rationalization 12,000 SKUs only in joint reconstruction. 14,000 in spine. Benefits: Reduced complexity Improved forecast Lower inventory How? Incentivize designers for fewer new instruments. End of life process – charge for ‘exotic’ instruments Order instruments in product families Dedicated capacity Eliminate/Reduce MOQ Avoid working with one instrument supplier DePuy D1 D2 D3 D4

34 Recommendations Distribution Channel DePuy Practices
Suppliers Management Build a Database of inventory Replenishments between distributors Slow movers managed by DePuy SKU Rationalization Better management of instruments under VMI Consider relaxing LOS when servicing distributors Simplify the process of opening PO Manage legacy and base instruments differently Order instruments in product families Dedicated capacity Eliminate/Reduce MOQ Avoid working with one instrument supplier DePuy D1 D2 D3 D4

35 MIT SCM ResearchFest May 21, 2015
Questions? MIT SCM ResearchFest May 21, 2015


Download ppt "Improving Supply Chain Agility of a Medical Device Manufacturer"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google