Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Kylie Lange, CRE Biostatistician

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Kylie Lange, CRE Biostatistician"— Presentation transcript:

1 Kylie Lange, CRE Biostatistician
Power calculations adelaide.edu.au

2 Q12. Animal Number Justification
University of Adelaide

3 (a) What is the key outcome measure of interest?
1 outcome per experiment 1 power calculation per outcome If one experiment contains multiple outcomes (eg histological, biochemical & behavioural outcomes), then report the power calculation for the outcome that requires the largest number of animals Specify the exact form of the outcome, particularly for serial measurements Eg: change over time (absolute or percentage?), difference between groups (at which time point?), a derived measure, ratios/indices University of Adelaide

4 (b) What is the effect size of minimum biological significance?
What size effect in the key outcome has actual biological relevance? This is a biological question, not statistical Eg - weight loss in an obesity model – how much greater weight loss over control is needed before you can expect reduced cardiovascular risk, reduced mortality, improved quality of life, improved fertility outcomes? Provide a justification of this value Where does it come from (previous studies, pilot data)? What hard outcome does it relate to? How big is it relative to the effect observed for alternative interventions? University of Adelaide

5 (c) What is the estimated standard deviation of this outcome measure?
Provide the source of the estimate Previously published studies, pilot study, lab data Provide a justification of why this estimate is relevant Has the estimate been taken from same/similar/different: Population Intervention Measurement methods (Note that if the outcome is a proportion then SD is not applicable) University of Adelaide

6 (d) What power level (1-beta) and statistical significance (alpha) will be employed?
Alpha = Probability of a type I error Type I error = Find evidence of an effect when it truly does not exist (“false positive”) Beta = Probability of type II error Type II error = Fail to find evidence of an effect when it truly does exist (“false negative”) Usual conventions are alpha = & 1-beta = but these are arbitrary and can be (should be!) varied depending on the context Provide justification if using anything different Risk/benefit balance may vary depending on the invasiveness of the intervention, side effects, cost, expected benefits. Implications of each type of error. University of Adelaide

7 (e) What statistical test will be employed for data analysis
(e) What statistical test will be employed for data analysis? And, will data be analysed using a one- or two-sided test? Two-sided test: Evidence of an effect will be concluded if a difference exists in either direction (eg, A>B or A<B) One-sided test: Evidence of an effect will only be concluded if a difference exists in one pre-specified direction (eg, A>B) Choice of test depends on Form of the research hypothesis Study design Measurement types of the variables Number of groups/treatments/time points Any additional confounders to be controlled for Sequential stopping rule (SSR): add a predetermined number of subjects at each stage and test repeatedly for significance until the experiment is stopped because (1) a sig effect is detected, (2) the effect is clearly not going to be significant, or (3) the predetermined maximal number of subjects has been reached. Holds the prob of type I error constant, maintains power. Requires a defined p-value criteria for significance and for futility. University of Adelaide

8 Summary Provide enough information that the power calculation can be replicated Justify the choices made This is the best time to engage with a statistician! University of Adelaide

9 Clinical significance v statistical significance
Not significant Significant Not important Happy Annoyed Practical importance of observed effect Want to ensure that statistical significance agrees with clinical significance Power = probability that your study will find a clinically interesting finding statistically significant, if it exists Statistical significance The relationship is detectable over the background levels of variation/noise Clinical significance Does the observed effect correspond to a clinically relevant or interesting finding? Important Very sad Elated ©Helena Oakey, 2009 University of Adelaide

10 Power analysis Requires you to know five things:
Statistical test to be used Desired significance level Desired power Expected level of variation in the outcome What size effect is biologically important Once have defined/estimated these then formulae/software can calculate power and sample size Power analysis will maximise the chance that your study will fall in the ‘happy’ or ‘elated’ scenarios, and not the ‘annoyed’ or ‘very sad’ scenarios University of Adelaide


Download ppt "Kylie Lange, CRE Biostatistician"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google