1. Date of download: 10/9/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Multicriteria Assessment of the Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Cell Design and Materials Development: Design and Modeling Approach
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;10(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Schematic design of a flat tubular type of cell

2. Date of download: 10/9/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Multicriteria Assessment of the Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Cell Design and Materials Development: Design and Modeling Approach
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;10(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Cell efficiency (dc) as a function of stack dc output power, according to the cell performance plotted in Fig. 3 (fuel utilization = 0.7). The filled circle indicates the standard dc output condition.

3. Date of download: 10/9/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Multicriteria Assessment of the Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Cell Design and Materials Development: Design and Modeling Approach
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;10(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Schematic design of the microtubular type of cell: (a) dimension of a single cell; (b) stack configuration (type A); and (c) stack configuration (type B)

4. Date of download: 10/9/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Multicriteria Assessment of the Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Cell Design and Materials Development: Design and Modeling Approach
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;10(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Dependence of stack weight, stack volume, and volumetric power density (dc output power/stack volume) on areal power density for a flat tubular type of cell at a fixed dc output power of 800 W

5. Date of download: 10/9/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Multicriteria Assessment of the Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Cell Design and Materials Development: Design and Modeling Approach
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;10(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Cell voltage, polarization, and power density for a standard single cell performance as a function of current density under standard operation conditions (see Table 1). Polarization curves, (a) ohmic loss; (b) cathode activation; (c) anode activation; (d) anode concentration; and (e) cathode concentration. The filled circle indicates the standard dc output condition.

6. Date of download: 10/9/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Multicriteria Assessment of the Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Cell Design and Materials Development: Design and Modeling Approach
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;10(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The influence of cell design on (a) stack weight, (b) net cell-module volume with a reformer, and (c) net volumetric power density for flat tubular, and microtubular cells (types A and B) at a fixed dc output power of 800 W. (See main text for the definitions of (b) and (c).)

7. Date of download: 10/9/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Multicriteria Assessment of the Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Cell Design and Materials Development: Design and Modeling Approach
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;10(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The influence of cell design on cell efficiency for flat tubular and microtubular cells (types A and B) at a fixed net volumetric power density (0.21 kW/L: reference value of a flat tubular type of cell)

8. Date of download: 10/9/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Multicriteria Assessment of the Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells by Cell Design and Materials Development: Design and Modeling Approach
J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;10(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Sensitivity analysis for cell design and material properties of electrode and electrolyte. The broken line represents the base curve for a flat tubular type of cell, i.e., the relationship between net volumetric power density (y) and electrode area for the single cell (x) [y = −0.38 ln(x) + 1.5].