Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Child Outcomes State of the State

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Child Outcomes State of the State"— Presentation transcript:

1 Child Outcomes State of the State
DEC Conference 10/15/2010 Child Outcomes State of the State Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education Office of Early Learning and School Readiness Ohio Department of Education

2 Ohio: Demographics 6th Largest State for children with disabilities (ages 3-21) 12/09 child count: 23,246 612 School Districts 88 Counties Education Service Centers County Boards of DD 16 State Support Teams-regionalized TA/PD

3 Ohio Assessment Policies
State statute requires programs to document child progress using research-based indicators prescribed by the Department and report results annually.

4 Accountability & Continuous Improvement
Ohio Early Learning Program Guidelines: Systematically assess conditions, practices, policies and program performance Conduct annual self-assessment with identified stakeholders and community partners to evaluate accomplishment of program goals Data reported to ODE Child progress data Program licensure report Family input and feedback Complaint records Fiscal reports Transition services

5 Early Childhood Outcomes Summary Form
Initial year of the COSF: 2007 Trained local teams of teachers and administrators Locals report scores to state Fall & spring of every year State does conversion of COSF scores to progress categories Implementing alternate form spring 2011 Source summary OR Evidence statements

6 Early Childhood Outcomes Summary Form
Multiple Sources Required Two Sources are consistent statewide for funded programs Get It! Got It! Go! & Ages/Stages Questionnaire: Social-Emotional (completed with parent)

7 Measurement System Knowledge & Skills
Preschool special education supervisors Annual series of communication Fall Data/Reporting Requirements February Supervisor Discussions Spring Institutes Two Institutes Stage 1: Data Quality and Accuracy Stage 2: Data Analysis and Public Reporting For families: outcomes brochure/cards

8 Measurement System Knowledge & Skills
Data collection protocols Data checks in the state data system Funding impact

9 Data Collection: Efficient, Effective, Accurate

10 Measurement System Knowledge & Skills
New Web page Webinar series (in development with ECO Center) Teacher reference sheet Approved PD through regional state support teams Alternate COSF form- 2 options

11 Teacher Reference: PROCESS Implementation

12 ECO Implementation Survey
Purpose: Identify challenging practices for local districts and personnel Survey May 2010 Lessons Learned: Multiple sources of information Duplication of source summaries Comparable to same-aged peers Use of Decision Tree Fidelity of Process Data Issues

13 Use of the Decision Tree
2010 ECO Conference How Will I Know?

14 ECO Implementation Survey
Lessons Learned Core team input Preschool special education teacher General education teacher Parent Related services personnel Involving parent

15 Reasons for Completion without all Members Contributing
2010 ECO Conference How Will I Know?

16 Involving Parents 2010 ECO Conference How Will I Know?

17 WHOLE Whole child Whole class Whole system How is this in evidence?

18 Accountability Framework Early Childhood
DEC Conference 10/15/2010 Accountability Framework Early Childhood Child and Family Outcome Measures Literacy: GGG and KRA_L Early Childhood Outcomes Summary Parent Survey Health & Developmental Screenings Aligned with P-12 Content Standards Our Early Learning Programs fall within an accountability framework – measuring outcomes at the child and family levels; the classroom level and at the program level. Program capacity measures: ELLCO, Self-reflection planning tool, Step Up, Curriculum embedded performance measures: ELI programs asked to identify a curriculum and measures for it. They are to align their curriculum with Ohio’s early learning content standards and encompass all developmental domains. They most often use creative curriculum or high scope. We are working to help identify more curriculum embedded performance measures. Child/Family Outcome measures include: GGG, KRAL—will include health and developmental screenings, parent survey Most commonly used curriculums for preschool = Creative Curriculum & High Scope Most commonly used PSE = Creative & AEPS Program Capacity Measures Curriculum-Embedded Performance Measures ELLCO: Early Language & Literacy Classroom Observation ELLRT: Early Language & Literacy Reflection Tool Self-Assessment Tools Tools for Alignment to the Early Learning Content Standards IEP Outcomes Ohio Department of Education 18

19 State Infrastructure Regionally Based/Local Needs
Professional Development Preschool Literacy Core Curriculum (CORE) SIRI: Pre K/K State Institutes for Reading Instruction Teacher Leaders Ohio Early Learning Content Standards Integrated Curriculum The IEP and the Early Childhood Curriculum Assessment Training Observation and Mentoring ELLCO Observations and TA English Language Learners Regional Leadership Meetings

20 PD Connection IVDL/Higher Education Faculty
At no cost unless college credit desired Institute of Education Science Grant- APPLE: Ohio Evaluate statewide professional development in Ohio 80 Teacher Leaders each year Group A will participate in the Preschool Literacy Core Group B will participate in Preschool Literacy Core with Teacher Leader support Group C will participate in two of the Ohio Early Learning Content Standards modules (Math, Science, Social Studies)

21 Ohio Resource Center for Mathematics, Science ad Reading
Resources for early childhood Early Childhood Bookshelf Standards-aligned and Peer Reviewed Lessons Early Childhood Building Blocks- Best Practice Articles

22 DEC Conference 10/15/2010 What do we know? Children served in Public Preschool and PSE classrooms experienced statistically significant growth from fall to spring Public Preschool participants had significantly higher KRA-L scores than all other K students. PSE participants who are nondisabled in K have higher KRA-L scores than all other K students who are nondisabled. We looked at the Fall 2007 KRAL results (FY08) for children participating in state funded preschool programs. KRA-L Notes: 1. Probability levels: The higher KRA-L scores for the differences expressed above comparing ECE or PS-SE students to other kindergarten students are all statistically significant at p < .01. (T-test and ANOVA analyses). 2. KRA-L Statistics: Former ECE students (N=3266, Mean = 21.03, SD= 6.02) Former PS-SE students not classified as SWD (N=4071, Mean = 22.02, SD= 5.88) All kindergarten students from neither ECE nor PS-SE programs (N= 113,035, Mean =19.77, SD = 6.94) All kindergarten students from neither ECE nor PS-SE programs and not classified as SWD (N= 108,039, Mean = 19.96, SD= 6.85. Ohio Department of Education

23 DEC Conference 10/15/2010 Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation (ELLCO) Study Results Instrument Methodology Classrooms rated on 14 individual ELLCO elements 5 point evidence scale (5 = exemplary or strong evidence) 2 subscales: General Classroom Environment Language, Literacy and Curriculum Stratified random sample of PSE classrooms 2009: 115 observations in PSE 2010: 299 observations conducted The ELLCO is study conducted by Learning Point Associates on behalf of ODE. We have had a focus on PSE classrooms. The tool is a published (Brookes) observation tool that focuses on the quality of the literacy classroom environment. Research questions focused on: What is the quality of literacy practices in ODE funded programs? How do the scores of programs and/or classrooms compare to recognized standards of effective literacy practice, as defined by a 4 or 5 on the ELLCO rating scale? Based on ELLCO results, what are statewide or local PD needs? 2 well-trained observers were sent into each selected classroom to watch minutes of the classrooms, followed by a 10 minute interview. Observers watch same activity simultaneously and must reach consensus on the individual classrooms ratings following the observation. Ohio Department of Education

24 ELLCO Study Questions What is the quality of literacy practices in ODE-funded early education programs? How do the scores of programs and classrooms compare with recognized standards of effective literacy practice (defined as a 4 or 5 on the ELLCO rating scales)? To what extent are teachers (best practices) and programs (capacity) making progress toward reaching or exceeding recognized standards of literacy practice that promote literacy success? Based on the ELLCO results, what are statewide or local professional development needs?

25 ELLCO Mean Ratings for PSE Classrooms, Spring 2010, N=299
DEC Conference 10/15/2010 ELLCO Mean Ratings for PSE Classrooms, Spring 2010, N=299 Learning Point Associates examined mean ratings and sum scores of PSE classrooms to determine the quality of literacy practice at the state level. As shown in Figure 3, average ratings on a five-point scale in Spring 2010 were 3.94 for the General Classroom Environment Subtotal; 3.63 for the Language, Literacy, and Curriculum Subtotal; and 3.71 for the Classroom Observation Total. Ohio’s Early Learning Program Guidelines established an average rating of 4 as the goal for all PSE teachers. On average, the quality of the classroom environment and literacy practices was rated at the “Basic,” (3) level, although the General Classroom Environment score was only slightly below the ODE-desired standard of 4 or higher. Ohio Department of Education

26 ELLCO Mean Ratings for PSE Classrooms, Spring 2009
DEC Conference 10/15/2010 ELLCO Mean Ratings for PSE Classrooms, Spring 2009 STANDARD EFFECTIVE PRACTICE The observations conducted in the spring of 2009 demonstrated average ratings on a five-point scale of 4.11 for the General Classroom Environment Subtotal; 3.74 for the Language, Literacy, and Curriculum Subtotal; and 3.82 for the Classroom Observation Total. N=115 *N=116 Ohio Department of Education

27 ELLCO Results 2010 Highest-rated ELLCO elements:
DEC Conference 10/15/2010 ELLCO Results 2010 Highest-rated ELLCO elements: Classroom Management Strategies (Mean=4.29) Classroom Climate (Mean=4.24) Organization of the Classroom (Mean=3.99) Lowest-rated ELLCO elements: Presence and Use of Technology (Mean=3.18) Recognizing Diversity in the Classroom (Mean=2.84) In general, the highest rated ELLCO elements and lowest rated elements are the same as the previous year. Ohio Department of Education

28 Summary of ELLCO Results 2010
DEC Conference 10/15/2010 Summary of ELLCO Results 2010 41% PSE classrooms demonstrated effective literacy practices Higher levels of teacher educational attainment were associated with higher ELLCO ratings for all three scores Average early childhood education teaching experience was approximately 12 years Teachers with 13 or more years of teaching experience scored significantly higher on the Language, Literacy, and Curriculum Subtotal & Classroom Observation Total than teachers with 6-12 years of teaching experience Higher ELLCO ratings are associated with classrooms that have a smaller percentage of students with disabilities ELLCO findings suggest that within preschool special education classrooms across the state, the quality of literacy instruction and classroom environments is slightly below the designated level of proficiency. Overall, 41 percent of PSE classrooms demonstrated effective literacy practices, and 83 percent were either at the “Basic” or “Proficient” levels. The Classroom Observation Total mean rating was 3.71 in Spring This rating was slightly lower than 4.00 (the rating designated by ODE as demonstrating effective literacy practices). In addition, the quality of literacy instruction stayed consistent from Spring 2009 to Spring 2010. The mean rating from Spring 2010 was slightly lower than the mean rating from Spring 2009; though not statistically different. As in Spring 2009, PSE classrooms continued to score higher on the General Classroom Environment Subtotal than on the Language, Literacy, and Curriculum Subtotal. Classrooms with teachers with master’s degrees received significantly higher ratings than classrooms with teachers with bachelor’s degrees. Ohio Department of Education

29

30


Download ppt "Child Outcomes State of the State"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google