Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparisons between Magnetic field Perturbations and model dipole moments at Europa Derek Podowitz EAS 4480 4/28/2011.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparisons between Magnetic field Perturbations and model dipole moments at Europa Derek Podowitz EAS 4480 4/28/2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparisons between Magnetic field Perturbations and model dipole moments at Europa
Derek Podowitz EAS 4480 4/28/2011

2 Background Europa has an induced dipole magnetic field
Orientation of magnetic field measurements x: In direction of rotation and plasma flow y: In direction of Jupiter z: Opposite direction of the magnetic field C. Paty 2006

3 Procedure and Data Galileo magnetometer measurements from Planetary Data System: Europa pass E12,Time increment: 1/3 seconds Periodogram: sampling frequency = 3 Hz Butterworth filter: Low Pass Cut-off Frequency: Nyquist Frequency: 3/0.5 = 1.5

4 Procedure and Data Background Magnetic fields
Linear regression Magnetic field Perturbations Residual Analysis Calculated Dipole vs. Perturbation Distribution: Chi-squared analysis, student’s t-test Equation: Dipole moment = 2*m

5 Background Magnetic Fields

6 Magnetic field Perturbations
Residual calculation Bperturbation = Bt – Bt-fit

7 Observed vs. Modeled magnetic field
Chi-squared analysis was done to fit the dipole to the observed filtered perturbation data moment = e+018, n = 8176 points, dof = 997 theoretical chi-squared value =

8 Conclusion Low pass filter is a better choice to filter the data
Testing for permanent Dipole moment Chi-squared test showed that Europa’s magnetic field signature is not a normal distribution: B_chi2 = The student’s t test: The means are not equivalent mean_difference = Bt_mean = 95% confidence interval = Dipole_mean Other factors at play to produce signatures Possible corrections: Using more strict parameters when analyzing background magnetic field to obtain better approximation of perturbations

9 References Kivelson M.G., et al. Galileo Magnetometer Measurements: Stronger Case for a Subsurface Ocean at Europa, Science 289, 1340 (2000). Paty, C. 'Ganymede’s Magnetosphere: Unraveling the Ganymede-Jupiter Interaction through Combining Multi-fluid Simulations and Observations.' PhD thesis. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. (2006). PDS: The Planetary Data System. JPL/NASA. 2/ Hand, Kevin P. and Christopher F. Chyba. Empirical constraints on the salinity of the europan ocean and implications for a thin ice shell. Icarus Volume 189, Issue 2, August 2007, Pages

10 References Project4480


Download ppt "Comparisons between Magnetic field Perturbations and model dipole moments at Europa Derek Podowitz EAS 4480 4/28/2011."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google