Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPreston Blair Modified over 6 years ago
1
Comparison of Low Versus High (>40 mm Hg) Pulse Pressure to Predict the Benefit of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial) Saadia Sherazi, MD, MS, Ilan Goldenberg, MD, Arthur J. Moss, MD, Scott Solomon, MD, Valentina Kutyifa, MD, PhD, Scott McNitt, MS, Abrar H. Shah, MD, David T. Huang, MD, Mehmet K. Aktas, MD, Wojciech Zareba, MD, PhD, Alon Barsheshet, MD American Journal of Cardiology Volume 114, Issue 7, Pages (October 2014) DOI: /j.amjcard Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
2
Figure 1 Distribution of baseline PP in CRT-D and LBBB patients.
American Journal of Cardiology , DOI: ( /j.amjcard ) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
3
Figure 2 Effects of CRT-D on echocardiographic measures in patients with high and low PP. ΔVolume/baseline = (1 year volume − baseline volume)/baseline volume. ΔSD/baseline = (1 year SD − baseline SD)/baseline SD. LVESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVEDV = left ventricle end-diastolic; SD = standard deviation of dyssynchrony measure. The bars represent median values; p <0.05 for all 3 comparisons. American Journal of Cardiology , DOI: ( /j.amjcard ) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
4
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier estimates of probability of HF or death events after 1 year of follow-up in 2 groups of PP (lowest quartile [Q1] vs high quartiles [Q2–4]). American Journal of Cardiology , DOI: ( /j.amjcard ) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.