Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLucas Ellis Modified over 6 years ago
1
Effect of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition on Exercise
Capacity and Clinical Status in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (RELAX): A Randomized Clinical Trial Margaret M Redfield, MD on behalf of the NHLBI Heart Failure Clinical Research Network
2
Background ● Phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) metabolizes nitric
oxide (NO) and natriuretic peptide (NP) generated cGMP ● If PDE-5 is activated in HF; may limit beneficial NO and NP actions in the heart, vasculature and kidney ● PDE-5 Inhibitor therapy approved for • Erectile dysfunction • Group I pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) ● Role in heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction unclear
3
Background ● Experimental HF: PDE-5 inhibition
• Reversed cardiac remodeling and dysfunction • Improved vascular and renal function ● Small Clinical Studies: PDE-5 inhibition (sildenafil) • HFrEF Improved maximal exercise capacity • HFpEF + PAH + RV dysfunction Improved hemodynamics, lung function, RV function and LV remodeling
4
Hypothesis In comparison to placebo, chronic (24 weeks)
therapy with the PDE-5 inhibitor sildenafil will improve exercise capacity (peak VO2) and clinical status in HFpEF.
5
Study population ≥ 400 pg/ml or
● NYHA class II-IV HF symptoms ● EF ≥ 50% ● Objective evidence of HF (at least one) • HF hospitalization or ED visit + iv diuretic • Elevated PCWP at catheterization for dyspnea • Left atrial enlargement + chronic diuretic for HF ● At study entry (both) • Peak VO2 < 60% age/sex nl value + RER ≥ 1.0 • NT-proBNP ≥ 400 pg/ml or < 400 pg/ml with documented ↑ PCWP ≤ two weeks of NT-proBNP < 400
6
Study Design Placebo 20 mg TID Sildenafil 20 mg TID
Baseline CPXT, 6MWT, Echo-Doppler, MLHFQ, Biomarkers, and CMR (sinus rhythm) Double-blind; 1 to 1 randomization stratified by site and rhythm (AF) Placebo 20 mg TID Sildenafil 20 mg TID 12 week CPXT, 6MWT, MLHFQ Placebo 60 mg TID Sildenafil 60 mg TID 24 week CPXT, 6MWT, Echo-Doppler, MLHFQ, Biomarkers and CMR
7
Study Endpoints ● Secondary Endpoints ● Other Endpoints
● Primary Endpoint • Change in peak VO2 after 24 weeks of therapy ● Secondary Endpoints • Change in 6MWD after 24 weeks of therapy • Hierarchical composite clinical rank score ● Other Endpoints • Change in CV structure and function (24 weeks) Echo-Doppler Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) • Change in biomarkers (24 weeks)
8
Hierarchical composite clinical rank score
At 24 weeks, all patients ranked 1 X FIRST Death LAST Death
9
Hierarchical composite clinical rank score
At 24 weeks, all patients ranked 1 X X+1 Y FIRST Death LAST Death Alive with FIRST CV or cardiorenal hsp Alive with LAST CV or cardiorenal hsp
10
Hierarchical composite clinical rank score
At 24 weeks, all patients ranked 1 X X+1 Y Y+1 Z FIRST Death LAST Death Alive with FIRST CV or renal hospitalization Alive with LAST CV or renal hospitalization LEAST favorable change in MLHFQ MOST favorable change in MLHFQ Mean rank score (lower worse) compared between treatment groups Anchor value (no treatment effect) = Z / 2
11
HF hospitalization in past year Hx hypertension
Baseline Features Characteristic Age (years) Female White race BMI (kg/m2) NYHA class II/III HF hospitalization in past year Hx hypertension Hx of coronary artery disease Diabetes Hx of atrial fibrillation Median values or % shown Placebo (N = 103) 69 53% 92% 33 45% / 55% 39% 90% 36% 44% 50% Sildenafil (N = 113) 68 43% 90% 33 49% / 51% 35% 80%* 42% 52% *p-value < 0.05
12
Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) (% predicted) Chronotropic incompetence present
Baseline Features Characteristic Ejection fraction (%) NT-proBNP (pg/ml) Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) (% predicted) Chronotropic incompetence present 6MWD (m) (% predicted) Cardiac index (L/min/m2) - (normal > 2.5) Relative Wall Thickness ≥ 0.42 E/e’ - (normal ≤ 8) LA volume index (ml/m2) - (normal < 29) PASP (mmHg) - (normal < 30) Median values or % shown Placebo (N = 103) 60 648 11.9 (41%) 78% 305 (68%) 2.48 44% 17 43 41 Sildenafil (N = 113) 60 757 11.7 (41%) 76% 308 (70%) 2.47 48% 15 44 41 All p > 0.05
13
Results:
14
Results: Primary Endpoint
Change in Peak VO2 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 ml/kg/min Placebo n = 94 (91%) Sildenafil n = 91 (80%) Withdrew consent (n=14), death (n=3), unwilling (n=3) or unable (n=9) to complete CPXT, inadequate peak VO2 data (n=2)
15
Results: Primary Endpoint
Change in Peak VO2 p = 0.90 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 ml/kg/min Placebo n = 94 (91%) Sildenafil n = 91 (80%) Sensitivity analyses for missing data Multiple imputation: p = 0.98; LOCF: p = 0.98 Data are median and IQR
16
Results: Secondary Endpoints
Change in 6MWD p = 0.92 60 40 20 -20 -40 meters Placebo n = 95 Sildenafil n = 90 Data are median and IQR
17
Results: Secondary Endpoints
Mean Clinical Rank Score 105 100 p = 0.85 Anchor Value 95 90 85 Placebo n = 94 Sildenafil n=95
18
Results: Safety Sildenafil 0% 3% 13% 13% 76% 80% 16% 22% 8% 16%
Characteristic Death (%) CV or cardiorenal hospitalization (%) Adverse events (%) Serious adverse events (%) Withdrew or Unwilling or Unable to complete 24 week CPXT Placebo 0% 13% 76% 16% 8% Sildenafil 3% 13% 80% 22% 16% All p > 0.05
19
Results: Other endpoints
Placebo 0.6 -1.6 -2 0.01 -23 -0.01 Sildenafil -1.5 0.2 2 0.05* 15* 0.38* 0.30* *p-value < 0.05 Characteristic Change in LV mass by CMR (g) Change in E/e’ Change in PASP (mmHg) Change in creatinine (mg/dl) Change in cystatin C (mg/L) Change in NT-proBNP (pg/ml) Change in endothelin-1 (pg/ml) Change in uric acid (mg/dl) Median values shown
20
Conclusions ● Chronic therapy with the PDE-5 inhibitor sildenafil
was not associated with clinical benefit in HFpEF ● Continued efforts to identify key pathophysiologic perturbations and novel therapeutic targets in HFpEF are needed
21
Montreal Heart Institute BIOMARKER CORE University of Vermont
Mayo Clinic ECHO CORE DCRI BIOMARKER CORE University of Vermont Harvard University CPXT CORE NHLBI CMR CORE Duke University Minnesota Heart Failure Consortium University of Utah Morehouse School of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine
22
JAMAARTICLE FIGURE
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.