1. New York: Evolution of an ESInet
May 19, 2015

2. Quick Facts Founded 1987, Annapolis, MD as a technology-driven company
Nearly 350 patents allowed and 400 applications pending
1,300 employees, mostly technical
Certifications include ISO 9001:2008, ISO 27001:2005, and TL 9000
Publicly traded since 2000 (NASDAQ:TSYS)

3. Global Offices & Deployments

4. TCS Capabilities Government Solutions Safety & Security
US Leader in NG9-1-1
56% Market Share
Leader in
Deployable
Communication
>800 SNAP
Deployable
VSAT
Only Non-Carrier
TL-9000 NOC
US Navy E911
>50 Bases
Leader in DoD
Cyber Mission & Cyber Training
Leader in
Wireless Mobility
#1 Message Provider in US (1 Trillion/Year); #3 in World
>20 Active Cyber Programs
#2 Location Infrastructure Provider in World (6 Billion Monthly Transactions)
Cyber Intelligence
Commercial Software

5. TCS Public Safety Operational Experience
The Leading Provider of NG9-1-1 i3 Solutions
More Than 220,000 Calls Processed per Day from More Than 140 Million Wireless Subscribers and 12 Million VoIP Subscribers
More Than 15 Years Continuous Operation, Providing 24x7 System and Network Monitoring and Support
International ISO 27001, ISO 9001, and TL 9000 Certifications
Only TL 9000-certified Non-Carrier Company in Support of E9-1-1 Services Since 2003

6. The NG9-1-1 Ecosystem

7. NENA i3 ESInet Elements… In English
Inputs
Outputs
Pictures, Video, Graphics
Gateway
9-1-1 Call
Routing
Control
Gateway
Location Info
Border Control
Functions grouped together in E9-1-1 are separated in NG Address (MSAG) validation, subscriber data and location data are all handled by the ALI system in E In NG9-1-1, the functions are separate because of nomadicity and mobility. Today, the subscriber info and the location are independent of each other, so they must be managed separately in NG9-1-1.
Same goes for call routing, handled in the Selective Router/Tandem in E In NG, a database (ECRF) determines where to route the call and a separate device handles the physical transmission. (This is actually the same way a 5ESS SR works today.)
Subscriber Info
Location (Address)
Validation 7

8. Call Flow – Legacy Wireless Example
2) Location information for caller/device is retrieved
Location
Source
VoIP (i2)
Call
3) (optional) Initial routing instructions are retrieved
Legacy Wireline
Incoming
Gateway
Call
Routing
6) The NG9-1-1 call routing system determines final routing instructions using GIS data and policy rules
Legacy PSAP
Legacy Wireless
ESINet
4) Call is sent to the security edge
1) Caller dials 9-1-1
Border
Control
PSAP
Gateway
Call
Delivery
Static
Native IP
5) The call passes security checks
NG9-1-1 PSAP
7) If the PSAP is i3-capable, the call is routed directly to the PSAP 8

9. Call Flow – IP Routing Example
Location
Source
VoIP (i2)
Call
Legacy Wireline
Incoming
Gateway
Call
Routing
Legacy PSAP
Legacy Wireless
ESINet
Border
Control
PSAP
Gateway
Call
Delivery
Static
Native IP
Static
Location
Info
NG9-1-1 PSAP

10. NG9-1-1 Solutions Full Suite of i3 ESInet Components
Hosted Deployments
In-market Deployments
Hybrid Configurations
Private/Government or Commercial Networks
Call Handling
Hosted and Stand-Alone
Program Management
Proactive and Reactive Remote Monitoring

11. Building an NG9-1-1 Pilot System Challenges:
Find the right number of willing partners.
3-5 Counties is optimum for POC from TCS operational and engineering perspectives.
Might not be big enough to get traction in Albany
A larger system should be a “pilot” rather than a “trial”

12. Pilot System Suggestions
Ask State to fund a regional deployment of several counties in the Finger Lake region
Fiber networks in place
Willing players
Large enough to garner interest ($$) at the State level, but still be manageable
Grow that network by adding additional counties
No size limit
Can include counties in surrounding states.

13. Original Proposal: New York NG9-1-1 Pilot Network Architecture
TCS i3 Network
Dallas
Raleigh
MPLS
MPLS
Inter-County Fiber Network
Formed by the Interconnection of County Networks
Monroe
County
Steuben
County
Ontario
County
CAMA
CAMA
CAMA
VZ SR
FTR SR
FTR SR

14. Inter-County Fiber Network
Original Proposal: New York NG9-1-1 Pilot Network Architecture
TCS i3 Network
Raleigh
Dallas
LPG
MPLS
MPLS
Inter-County Fiber Network
LNG
Monroe County
Steuben County
LNG
LPG
LPG
LPG
LNG
Ontario County
CAMA
CAMA
CAMA
Incoming Call
Call Delivery to PSAP

15. Proof of Concept Architecture - Normal
Selective
Router
PSAP Trunks
PSAP
Call Handling Equipment
Incoming Trunks

16. POC Architecture - Proposed
TCS i3 Services
ECRF/ESRP/PRF/LPG
LNG
LPG
Telco
Network
PSAP

17. Version 2: New York NG9-1-1 Pilot Network Architecture
TCS i3 Network
Dallas
Raleigh SR SR
MPLS
MPLS
CAMA
CAMA
County Y
County X
Inter-County Fiber Network
Formed by the Interconnection of County Networks
Monroe
County
Steuben
County
Ontario
County
CAMA
CAMA
CAMA
VZ SR
FTR SR
FTR SR

18. Inside the Cloud

19. Evolution of an ESInet

20. Evolution of an ESInet Hosted: LVF POI POI In the Cloud - LNG/LSRG
- ECRF
- ESRP/PRF
- LPG
- Frontier POI Rochester?
- Verizon POI Corning?

21. Who’s In?

22. Contact Us Bob Gojanovich, ENP Regional Account Manager
(o) │ (m)
275 West Street
Annapolis, MD 21401
@telecomsys