Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Fig. 1 Mosaic display of PCEEC texts split according to time period, length of text, and gender of letter writer From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies.

Published byNorman Collins Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Fig. 1 Mosaic display of PCEEC texts split according to time period, length of text, and gender of letter writer From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies."— Presentation transcript:

1 Fig. 1 Mosaic display of PCEEC texts split according to time period, length of text, and gender of letter writer From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

2 Fig. 2 The most frequent changes involving nouns and pronouns in the ReCEEC. Compound tags are collapsed into their last component (e.g. N includes both the tag N and all compound tags ending in N) From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

3 Fig. 7 Variation in noun ratio in letters sent by men according to recipient’s gender
From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

4 Fig. 8 Variation in noun ratio in letters sent by women according to recipient’s gender
From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

5 Fig. 9 Variation in pronoun ratio in letters sent by men according to recipient’s gender
From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

6 Fig. 10 Variation in pronoun ratio in letters sent by women according to recipient’s gender
From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

7 Fig. 6 Sociolinguistic variation in pronoun ratio over time: gender
From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

8 Fig. 5 Sociolinguistic variation in noun ratio over time: gender
From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

9 Fig. 4 Variation in pronoun ratio over time
From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

10 Fig. 3 Variation in noun ratio over time
From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English Lit Linguist Computing. 2011;26(2): doi: /llc/fqr004 Lit Linguist Computing | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

Download ppt "Fig. 1 Mosaic display of PCEEC texts split according to time period, length of text, and gender of letter writer From: Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies."

Similar presentations

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation
From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.
Fig. 1 Flow chart of the COBRA-light trial and its extension study

Fig. 1 Flow chart of the COBRA-light trial and its extension study
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Fig. 1 Graphical representation
Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.

Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.

Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.
Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.
Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p

Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p
Fig. 7. Estimated damage ratio (eqn 3) of Abies mariesii along an altitude. The lines indicate 5, 10, 20 and 40 cm of DBH, as shown. Regression lines are.

Fig. 7. Estimated damage ratio (eqn 3) of Abies mariesii along an altitude. The lines indicate 5, 10, 20 and 40 cm of DBH, as shown. Regression lines are.
pSS: primary SS; Scl: scleroderma.

pSS: primary SS; Scl: scleroderma.
Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment
Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Figure 1. Selection of papers.
Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Similar presentations

Ads by Google