Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

“FRACTURES: WHEN TO CONSIDER ABUSE”

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "“FRACTURES: WHEN TO CONSIDER ABUSE”"— Presentation transcript:

1 “FRACTURES: WHEN TO CONSIDER ABUSE”
ARNE GRAFF MD MAYO CLINIC-ROCHESTER

2 OBJECTIVES: RECOGNIZE RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ABUSE
DEVELOP EVALUATION PROCESS HOW TO DEVELOP AN IMPRESSION

3 DISCLOSURE: NONE DO PARTICIPATE IN COURT CASES FOR BOTH THE DEFENSE AND PROSECUTORS

4 CASE 6 MONTH OLD MALE INFANT PRESENTS WITH MULTIPLE BRUISES NO HISTORY
SKELETAL SURVEY SHOWS DIAPHYSEAL TRANSVERSE FEMUR FRACTURE; NO OTHER INJURIES

5 PA IN CHILDREN #1 BRUISES #2 FRACTURES

6 TYPICAL CASE: THERE ISN’T ONE
EACH CASE MUST BE EVALUATED ON THE COMPLETE HISTORY AND WORKUP

7 OUR ROLE: TO PROVE IT’S NOT ABUSE CONSIDER: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS:
INJURY = HISTORY = ABILITY = MECHANICS DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: MEDICAL ACCIDENTAL: WITNESSED OR UNWITNESSED NONACCIDENTAL

8 FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE: MORE SERIOUS HARM TO CHILD!

9 THINGS TO CONSIDER: CONSIDER ALL FORMS OF ABUSE COEXISTING
CONSIDER WHOLE PICTURE: CONSISTENT HISTORY? TIMELY CARE SOUGHT? SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS CONSISTENT?

10 STARTING POINT: HISTORY AGE OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT OF CHILD
TYPE OF FRACTURE LOCATION OF FRACTURE “AGE” OF FRACTURE MECHANICS OF INJURY

11 WHO DID IT ? IN FACT IT IS NOT YOUR JOB OR MINE TO DETERMINE WHO DID IT! OUR JOB IS TO BE MEDICAL EXPERTS AND EXPLAIN POTENTIAL CAUSE.

12

13 KEY HISTORY: FMH: FRACTURES, HEARING, DENTAL, GENETICS MEDICATIONS
SOCIAL HISTORY: DV, non-BIOLOGICAL CAREGIVER PMH: MEDICAL CONDITIONS (renal, etc), PREMIE NUTRITIONAL: diet, VLGW SOCIAL SERVICE Hx: abuse, IPV, neglect, other

14 TYPICAL HISTORY: NONE VAGUE MINOR INJURY; INCONSISTENT WITH INJURY
HOWEVER, EVEN MINOR FALL CAN FX!

15 ABUSIVE FRACTURES: 20-30% OF PA VICTIMS MOST OFTEN IN INFANT/TODDLER
80% OF ABUSIVE FX <18 MOS AGE 25% OF FX <1YR OLD ARE ABUSIVE

16 85% OF NON-ABUSE FRACTURES ARE OVER THE AGE OF 5
HOWEVER, OVERALL ABUSIVE FRACTURS ARE A SMALL PERCENT OF TOTAL PEDS FRACTURES! 85% OF NON-ABUSE FRACTURES ARE OVER THE AGE OF 5

17 CONCERNING FRACTURES:
MULTIPLE FRACTURES MULTIPLE STAGES OF HEALING PRESENCE OF SUBPERIOLSTEAL NEW BONE FORMATION (<1 M OR >6 M)

18 KEY POINTS: PRESENCE OF A FRACTURE DOES NOT PROVE ABUSE
NO FRACTURE IS PATHOPNEUMONIC OF ABUSE

19

20 RED FLAGS: DEVELOPMENT OF CHILD DELAY IN SEEKING CARE
NON-MOBILE CHILD (INFANT) ANY INFANT FRACTURE WITHOUT HISTORY

21 LACK OF EXTERNAL SIGNS DOES NOT RULE OUT INJURY!

22 HISTORY: INJURY HISTORY PAST MEDICAL HISTORY DEVELOPMENT HISTORY
FAMILY MEDICAL HISTORY MEDICATIONS SOCIAL HISTORY

23 KEY CONSIDERATIONS: INJURY = HISTORY
CONSISTENT HISTORY (ER, EMS, YOURS) DEVELOPMENTAL HISTORY FIT CHILD’S RESPONSE TO INJURY FIT INJURY TO CARE TIME OTHER INJURIES SOCIAL RISKS

24 ACCIDENTS OCCUR; CAREGIVERS ARE EMBARRESSED!

25 HISTORY CHALLENGES: PROVIDER RELIES ON CAREGIVER HISTORY
OFTEN “NO” HISTORY PATIENT OFTEN UNABLE TO GIVE HISTORY LIMITED STUDIES FOR SORTING OUT

26 SYMPTOMS: LIMITED MOVEMENT OF EXTREMITY CRYING OR PAIN WITH MOVEMENT
MAY NOT SEE RESPIRATORY CHANGE OR……..CRYING AND NOT CONSOLABLE

27 SIGNS: NO BRUISING (8-9%) NO SWELLING NO DEFORMITY
LIMITED TENDERNESS, IF ANY

28 HEAD TO TOES EXAM: INJURIES NEUROLOGICAL EXAM DEVELOPMENTAL EXAM
OTHER FINDINGS (CONNECTIVE TISSUE, ETC)

29 RADIOLOGY EVAL

30 SKELETAL SURVEY AGE INDICATIONS FOR ABUSE: <2: FULL SKELETAL SURVEY
2-5: CASE BY CASE (AGE 2-3) >5: INDIVIDUAL FILMS OF INJURIES

31 SKELETAL SURVEY: NOT A “BABYGRAM” INCLUDES:
AP VIEWS OF ARMS, FORARMS, HANDS, FEMURS, LOWER LEGS*, FEET PA OF CHEST WITH OBLIQUES* LATERAL OF COMPLETE SPINE AP AND LATERAL OF SKULL AP OF PELVIS LIMITED RADIATION EXPOSURE

32 OBLIQUE VIEW

33 SKELETAL SURVEYS: FIRST SKELETAL SURVEY NEGATIVE; VALUE?
REPEAT SS IN TWO WEEKS WHAT TO REPEAT; WHAT TO OMIT?

34 SKELETAL SURVEY

35 RADIOLOGY:

36 BONE SCANS: SENSITIVE TEST: NEW RIB FRACTURES (7-10 DAY)
SUBTLE DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES EARLY PERIOSTEAL ELEVATIONS MOST FRACTURES BY 48 HOURS LESS SENSITIVE: SKULL FRACTURES DATING FRACTURES

37

38 NBPF NEW PERIOSTEAL BONE FORMATION NOT PHYSIOLOGIC: > 2mm
EXTENDS TO METAPHYSIS NOT LAMINAR 1MONTH < PATIENT AGE > 4 MONTHS

39

40 GROWTH ARREST LINES NOT SPECIFIC FOR MALTREATMENT SLOW GROWTH TIMES
RELATED TO PHYSIOLOGIC STRESS AS WITH ILLNESS OR STARVATION BREAK DOWN WITH TIME

41

42

43 “GROUND UP STRENGTH”

44 FRACTURE MECHANICS: TRANSVERSE: BENDING LOAD PERPENDICULAR
SPIRAL: TORSION OR TWIST TO LONG AXIS OBLIQUE: TORSION AND BEND COMBO BUCKLE: COMPRESSION ALONG LONG AXIS

45 MORE FX MECHANICS: SHORT FALL ONTO KNEE: torus or impacted transverse distal femur fx STAIRWAY FALL: twisted lower leg resulting in spiral femur fracture

46 OBLIQUE DISTAL FEMUR FX
No Caption Found FEMUR FX WITH EXERSAUSER OBLIQUE DISTAL FEMUR FX Grant, P. et al. Pediatrics 2001;108: Copyright ©2001 American Academy of Pediatrics

47 “SERIES OF FALLS”

48

49 AGE/DEVELOPMENT: TYPES AND CAUSES VARY FOR DIFFERENT STAGES OF AGE/DEVELOPMENT FEMUR TODDLER, SPORTS ? PULL TO STAND UPPER EXTREMITY SUPRACONDYLAR, DISTAL FORARM, SWOOSH

50 MECHANICS AND AGE: HUMERAL DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURE SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE
<18 MOS; HIGH RISK FOR ABUSE SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE ABULATORY CHILD; LOW RISK

51 INITIAL DIAGNOSIS; ONE MONTH LATER AND THE BOTTOM ONE IS TWO MONTHS FROM THE FIRST FILM
Kids heal fast!!

52 FRACTURES “SPECIFICITY”
FEMUR: TRANSVERS AND SPIRAL; BOTH RIBS: >1 FX SUGGESTIVE OF ABUSE UNILATERAL OR BILATERAL WITHOUT HX; HIGH SPECIFICITY SKULL: <3 MOST COMMON; BOTH PARIETAL LINEAR COMPLEX FX ???

53 MUTI-AGED FRACTURES MULTIPLE AGED FRATURES

54 rib

55 ACCIDENTAL AND ABUSE FEMUR (toddler fracture)
TIBIA/FIBULA (toddler fracture) HUMERUS (under 12mos 43% abuse) RADIUS/ULNA (>5) SKULL: most common fracture < 2yr CLAVICLE (most common peds fracture)

56 Orange arrow : toddler fracture
Blue arrow: spiral fracture

57 CML POINTS: CMLS’S: HIGHLY PREDICTIVE IN CHILD <1Y/O
CML: MOST COMMON FRACTURE IN FATAL CASES CORNER OR BUCKET-HANDLE NAME PLANAR FX THROUGH PRIMARY SPONGEOSIUM MECHANICS: TWIST, PULL, SHAKE

58 CMLS

59

60 OTHER FRACTURES: CLAVICLE: COMMON PEDS INJURY BIRTH TRAUMA (10-14DAY)
USUALLY MIDSHAFT AC FX—VIOLENT TRACTION VERTEBRAL: RARE; MRI STUDY HYPERFLEXION OF TORSO AND AXIAL SPINE LOADING

61 VERTEBRAL INJURIES: HYPEREXTENSION HYPERFLEXION COMPRESSION
Vertebral body fr

62 HIGH SPECIFICITY MODERATE SPECIFICITY LOW SPECIFICITY
Table 3 Specificity of fracture locations [77]. Specificity Fracture High Classic metaphyseal lesions Rib fractures (especially posteromedial) Scapular fractures Spinous process fractures Sternal fractures Moderate Multiple fractures (especially bilateral) Fractures of different ages Epiphyseal separations Vertebral body fractures and subluxations Digital fractures Complex skull fractures Low Subperiosteal new bone formation Clavicular fractures Long-bone shaft fractures Linear skull fractures HIGH SPECIFICITY MODERATE SPECIFICITY LOW SPECIFICITY

63 HARD TO DATE!

64 HEALING VARIES: BY SITE TYPE OF INJURY CARE/REINJURY PARIETAL SKULL FX

65 HEALING FACTORS: IMMOBILIZATION REPEATED TRAUMA DISEASE AGE
SEVERITY OF INJRUY DEGREE OF DISPLACEMENT

66 HEALING FRACTURES IMPORTANT TO NOTE NORMAL HEALING FOR FRACTURES
NOTE LACK OF NEW FRACTURES WHILE IN FOSTER/KINSHIP CARE

67 NORMAL VARIENTS

68 OTHER RADIOLOGY AIDS

69 3-D CT

70

71 Rotator cuff injury bite old rib fracture STIR STUDIES

72

73 FRACTURE LABS

74 INITIAL LABS: Ca Phosphorus Vit D PTH ALK PHOS

75 PA’S OTHER LABS: AMYLASE LIPASE UA SGOT, SGPT

76 MEDICAL FX CAUSES: OI OTEOPENIA OF PREMATURIT
OSTEOPENIA BY 6-12 WEEKS OLD RESOLVES BY 1 YR (IF OTHERWISE DOING WELL) “TEMPORARY BRITTLE BONE DISEASE” NOT A CLINICAL ENTITY

77 MEDICAL FX CAUSES: COPPER DEF VIT D DEFICIENCY EDS
PRETERM INFANT PATHOLOGIC FRACTURES OTHER: sideroblastic anemia, neutropenia CHECK: ceruloplasmin, copper VIT D DEFICIENCY EDS OTHER: menke’s, renal, paralysis, etc

78 GENETICS CONSULT? ENDOCRINE (BONE) CONSULT?

79

80 RICKETS ON LEFT; MENKES ON RIGHT

81 CASE #1 9 MOS INFANT URI RIB FRACTURE NOTED
OTHERWISE NEG SK S AND REPEAT NEG ? ACCIDENTAL; ISOLATED FRACTURE

82 CASE #2 3 YR OLD JUMPING OFF BED DAD REPORTS SHE LANDS AND CRIES OUT
WON’T BEAR WEIGHT PAST HISTORY NEG SINGLE DAD; NO CPS HISTORY

83 CASE #2 NEG SKEL SURVEY PATIENT’S HISTORY

84 YOUR HOSPITAL: PROTOCOL ? FOR ABUSE/FX ARTICLES/WORK WITH RADS

85 SUMMARY POINTS: ACCIDENTS CAN FX ANY BONE CONSIDER:
INJURY = HISTORY = ABILITY = MECHANICS CONSIDER ALL CAUSES FOR FRACTURE (S)


Download ppt "“FRACTURES: WHEN TO CONSIDER ABUSE”"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google