Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGabriella Barnett Modified over 6 years ago
1
BRAHMS Y2000 + Y2001 @ RHIC: snn=130 GeV, and snn=200 GeV
Reaction features in AGeV AGeV and 100 AGeV AGeV Au-AU collisions EM dissociation dN(ch)/d distribution -4<< vs. Collision Centrality Production of charged particles, N(ch)/pr.participant Bjorken limit attained ? Transparency or Stopping p-bar/p vs y, b, pt Strangeness vs y Future Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
2
BRAHMS Intl. collaboration
I.G. Bearden7, D. Beavis1, C. Besliu10, Y. Blyakhman6, J. Bondorf7, J.Brzychczyk4, B. Budick6, H. Bøggild7, C. Chasman1, C. H. Christensen7, P. Christiansen7, J.Cibor4, R.Debbe1, J. J. Gaardhøje7, K. Grotowski4, K. Hagel8, O. Hansen7, H. Heiselberg7, A. Holm7, A.K. Holme12, H. Ito11, E. Jacobsen7, A. Jipa10, J. I. Jordre10, F. Jundt2, C. E. Jørgensen7, T. Keutgen9, E. J. Kim5, T. Kozik3, T.M.Larsen12, J. H. Lee1, Y. K.Lee5, G. Løvhøjden2, Z. Majka3, A. Makeev8, B. McBreen1, M. Murray8, J. Natowitz8, B.S.Nielsen7, K. Olchanski1, D. Ouerdane7, R.Planeta4, F. Rami2, D. Roehrich9, B. H. Samset12, S. J. Sanders11, I. S. Sgura10, R.A.Sheetz1, Z.Sosin3, P. Staszel7, T.S. Tveter12, F.Videbæk1, R. Wada8 and A.Wieloch3. 1Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA IReS and Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland Institute of Nuclear Physics, Cracow, Poland Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA New York University, USA Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Texas A&M University, College Station. USA University of Bergen, Norway University of Bucharest, Romania University of Kansas, Lawrence,USA University of Oslo Norway Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
3
RHIC physics August 2000 & August 2001
BRAHMS: Lpeak = 3.3 1025 cm-2 s-1 Lave = 1.7 cm-2 s-1 Rcoll= 350 Hz 2:00 o’clock PHOBOS 10:00 o’clock RHIC PHENIX 8:00 o’clock STAR 4:00 o’clock 6:00 o’clock 6 b-1 U-line 9 GeV/u Q = +79 BAF (NASA) m g-2 LINAC BOOSTER 2 wks AGS HEP/NP 1 MeV/u Q = +32 TANDEMS August 2000 and 2001 Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
4
Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
BRAHMS in the 2’ hall … in 1998 Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
5
Forward & Midrapidity spectrometers
MRS: 2 TPC, 1 Dipole, 1TOF deg = FS: 2 TPC, 2 TOF, C1-threshold, 3 Drift Ch. Mod., RICH, 4 Dipoles deg. = Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
6
First BRAHMS collision at 100 AGeV+100AGeV
FS: 6 deg 0.8 msr T1 MRS: 90 deg 6.5 msr MTPC1 MTPC2 Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
7
BRAHMS acceptance August 2000 & 2001
Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
8
Global detectors SiMA, TMA, BB
97% (geom) SiMA (-2.0< <2.0) PTMA (-2.2< <2.2) Beam-Beam (3 < | | < 4) Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
9
Centrality determination Vertex distribution
Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
10
Electromagnetic nuclear dissociation
EM dissociation selected by ZDC coincidences and TMA Veto in BRAHMS n LO+NLO Mutual EM NLO Mutual Electromagnetic dissociation (Spectrum of virtual photons) * (absorption cross section) = WW Multiphonon GDR excitation, abs EM vs Nuclear coll. => neutron (L*R) coincidences RELDIS. Pshenichnov, JPB, IM, et al. 2n LO Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
11
Neutral Energy correlations (ZDC)
C2(EL,ER)=P(EL,ER)/(P(EL)*P(ER)) Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
12
dNch/d @ snn= 130 GeV SiMA, TMA, BB, TPC
BRAHMS Subm. Phys. Lett. B 7/2001. N=dE /<dE> P(0)/P(n1) Background corr.due to secondaries (37-50%) Consistency between 4 independent detector systems 65 AGeV+ 65 AGeV: N(ch)d= 4050±300 Central 0-5% dN(ch)/d (=0) =550 FWHM of distribution = 7.6 0.7 600 0-5% 5-10% 10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
13
TPC tracks, Vertex reconstruction, Charged particle track density
z MTPC1 Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
14
Charged Particle Mult. snn=130 GeV
SPS BRAHMS. Subm. to Phys Lett. B. 2001 Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
15
NCharged vs. number of participant nucleon pairs. snn=130AGeV
FRITIOF EKRT HIJING MTPC1 CEJ Claus Ekman Jørgensen. Thesis NBI 2001 dN/d 3 (=0) pr.part pair. Cf. HIJING, FRITIOF No saturation effects observed Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
16
RHIC: 200 AGeV Will this happen?
Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
17
Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
dNch/d for 100 AGeV AGeV BRAHMS 200AGEV 100 AGeV AGeV Au+Au N(ch)d= 5100±300 Central 0-6% dN(ch)/d (=0) =61050 FWHM of distribution = 7.9 1.0 Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
18
Hard and Soft vs. High Density QCD @ 200 AGeV
Kharzeev and Levin (nucl-th/ ) Soft-Hard: dN/d=(1-X) npp <Npart>/2 + X npp <Ncoll> <Ncoll>=1049, <Npart>=339, npp=2.43 =>dN/d=668 (with X=0.9) High Density QCD-saturation: dN/dy = f( Npart, Qs2, ,QCD,s,y) with =0.3 from HERA data => dN/d=620 (using dN/d=549 at s=130GeV) Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
19
Total production of Charged particles
BRAHMS 200 AGeV ? 130AGeV Syst 130 AGeV 4000 charged part. observed Nch 23.5 pr. part. pair cf. Nch 17 in p+p at s=130GeV 35-40% increase over p+p 200 AGeV 5100 charged part. observed Nch 30 pr. part. pair cf. Nch 20 in p+p at s=200GeV 50% increase over p+p Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
20
Hadron identification MRS (90, 40 deg)
K p 0 K± p-bar =3 p, pbar =0 p K m2=p2( t2 / L2 -1) Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
21
Hadron Identification FS (4 deg & 130AGeV)
=3 p-bar C1,H1,T2 m2=p2( t2 / L2 -1) + p p K+ + Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
22
N(pbar)/N(p) @ 130 AGeV Centrality and Pt dependence
Antiproton absorbtion correction to pbar/p ratio: 5 % for FS at 4 deg 2 % for MRS at 90, 40 deg 10% corr. (low pt) p from Be-tube Applied to data Most pbar and p from Hyperon decays fall into spectrometer acceptance. Correction factor depends on H/B, H-bar/B-bar and TB/TH For H/B < 0.5 systematic correction is < 5% on ratio Model dependent not applied to data Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
23
Bjorken limit reached for Au+Au snn= 130GeV?
ISR R803 s=63 s=23 BRAHMS PRL sept. 2001 Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
24
FS Hadron identification for snn = 200 GeV Au+Au
TOF and Cherenkov veto in FFS Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
25
Particle ratios snn = 200 GeV (y=2)
K- p- Y=2 : p-bar/p = 0.48 0.08 -/+= 0.98 0.04 BRAHMS: Preliminary Integrated over centrality and pt range K+ p Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
26
Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
N(p-bar)/N(p) systematics vs CM energy Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
27
Strangeness K-/K+ vs y @ snn= 130GeV
CERN-SPS BRAHMS Preliminary Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
28
How consistent are the models @ snn= 130GeV?
Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
29
Summary: First Au+Au snn=130 & 200 GeV
RESULTS: 65+65 Nch (0-5%) 4000 dN/d (y=0) 550. FWHM 7.6 N(ch) 23 pr. participant-pair dN/d (y=0) 3 pr. part. Pair AntiMeson/Meson close to unity p-bar/ p vs y shows increased but still incomplete transparency Midrapidity Plateau? y =0,0.7,2 : pbar/p 0.64, 0.66, 0.41 (±0.05 ± 0.06) Weak pt and centrality dependence Bjorken limit not reached Models inconsistent with data RESULTS: Nch (0-5%) 5100 dN/d (y=0) 625. FWHM 7.8 N(ch) 30 pr. participant-pair dN/d (y=0) 3.6 pr. part. Pair p-bar/p = 0.48 (y=2) Moderate growth in baryon poor ’plateau’. Total mult. Increases by 25%, Central mult increases by 14% Pbar/p increases by 17% (y=2) Large y and pt coverage to come Sept 4, 2001 Paris, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje, Niels Bohr Institute
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.