Achieving Health Equity

Achieving Health Equity
tools for a national campaign against racism Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 2016 SCTR Retreat on Health Disparities South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research Institute Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, South Carolina November 9, 2016

Levels of health intervention
Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

social determinants of health Primary prevention
Addressing the social determinants of health Primary prevention Safety net programs and secondary prevention Medical care and tertiary prevention Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

But how do disparities arise?
Differences in the quality of care received within the health care system Differences in access to health care, including preventive and curative services Differences in life opportunities, exposures, and stresses that result in differences in underlying health status Phelan JC, Link BG, Tehranifar P. Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Health Inequalities. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51(S):S28-S40. Byrd WM, Clayton LA. An American Health Dilemma: Race, Medicine, and Health Care in the United States, New York, NY: Routledge, 2002. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR (editors). Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2002.

Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

Differences in exposures and opportunities
Differences in access to care Differences in quality of care (ambulance slow or goes the wrong way) Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

social determinants of equity: Why are there differences in resources
Addressing the social determinants of equity: Why are there differences in resources along the cliff face? in who is found at different parts of the cliff? Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

3 dimensions of health intervention
Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

Health services Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

Health services Addressing social determinants of health Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

Health services Addressing social determinants of health Addressing social determinants of equity Jones CP et al. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2009.

What is racism? A system Jones CP. Confronting Institutionalized Racism. Phylon 2003;50(1-2):7-22.

What is racism? A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value Jones CP. Confronting Institutionalized Racism. Phylon 2003;50(1-2):7-22.

What is racism? A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on the social interpretation of how one looks (which is what we call “race”) Jones CP. Confronting Institutionalized Racism. Phylon 2003;50(1-2):7-22.

What is racism? A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on the social interpretation of how one looks (which is what we call “race”), that Unfairly disadvantages some individuals and communities Jones CP. Confronting Institutionalized Racism. Phylon 2003;50(1-2):7-22.

What is racism? A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on the social interpretation of how one looks (which is what we call “race”), that Unfairly disadvantages some individuals and communities Unfairly advantages other individuals and communities Jones CP. Confronting Institutionalized Racism. Phylon 2003;50(1-2):7-22.

What is racism? A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on the social interpretation of how one looks (which is what we call “race”), that Unfairly disadvantages some individuals and communities Unfairly advantages other individuals and communities Saps the strength of the whole society through the waste of human resources Jones CP. Confronting Institutionalized Racism. Phylon 2003;50(1-2):7-22.

Levels of racism Institutionalized Personally-mediated Internalized
Jones CP. Levels of Racism: A Theoretic Framework and a Gardener’s Tale. Am J Public Health 2000;90(8):

Institutionalized racism
Differential access to the goods, services, and opportunities of society, by “race” Examples Housing, education, employment, income Medical facilities Clean environment Information, resources, voice Explains the association between social class and “race” Jones CP. Levels of Racism: A Theoretic Framework and a Gardener’s Tale. Am J Public Health 2000;90(8):

Personally-mediated racism
Differential assumptions about the abilities, motives, and intents of others, by “race” Differential actions based on those assumptions Prejudice and discrimination Examples Police brutality Physician disrespect Shopkeeper vigilance Waiter indifference Teacher devaluation Jones CP. Levels of Racism: A Theoretic Framework and a Gardener’s Tale. Am J Public Health 2000;90(8):

Internalized racism Acceptance by the stigmatized “races” of negative messages about our own abilities and intrinsic worth Examples Self-devaluation White man’s ice is colder Resignation, helplessness, hopelessness Accepting limitations to our full humanity Jones CP. Levels of Racism: A Theoretic Framework and a Gardener’s Tale. Am J Public Health 2000;90(8):

Levels of Racism: A Gardener’s Tale
Jones CP. Levels of Racism: A Theoretic Framework and a Gardener’s Tale. Am J Public Health 2000;90(8):

Who is the gardener? Dangerous when Power to decide Power to act
Control of resources Dangerous when Allied with one group Not concerned with equity Jones CP. Levels of Racism: A Theoretic Framework and a Gardener’s Tale. Am J Public Health 2000;90(8):

“How is racism operating here?”
Identify mechanisms Structures: the who?, what?, when?, and where? of decision-making Policies: the written how? Practices and norms: the unwritten how? Values: the why? Jones CP. Confronting Institutionalized Racism. Phylon 2003;50(1-2):7-22.

What is [inequity] ? A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on [fill in the blank]

What is [inequity] ? A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on [fill in the blank], that Unfairly disadvantages some individuals and communities Unfairly advantages other individuals and communities Saps the strength of the whole society through the waste of human resources

Many axes of inequity “Race” Gender Ethnicity
Labor roles and social class markers Nationality, language, and legal status Sexual orientation Disability status Geography Religion Incarceration history These are risk MARKERS

What is health equity? “Health equity” is assurance of the conditions for optimal health for all people Achieving health equity requires Valuing all individuals and populations equally Recognizing and rectifying historical injustices Providing resources according to need Health disparities will be eliminated when health equity is achieved Jones CP. Systems of Power, Axes of Inequity: Parallels, Intersections, Braiding the Strands. Medical Care 2014;52(10 Suppl 3):S71-S75.

Barriers to achieving health equity
A-historical culture The present as disconnected from the past Current distribution of advantage/disadvantage as happenstance Systems and structures as givens and immutable Narrow focus on the individual Self-interest narrowly defined Limited sense of interdependence Limited sense of collective efficacy Systems and structures as invisible or irrelevant Myth of meritocracy Role of hard work Denial of racism Two babies: Equal potential or equal opportunity?

ICERD International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination International anti-racism treaty adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1965 US signed in 1966 US ratified in 1994

Current status 3rd US report submitted to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in 2013 82 parallel reports submitted by civil society organizations CERD considered at its 85th session (13-14 Aug 2014)

CERD Concluding Observations
14-page document (25 Sep 2014) available online Concerns and recommendations Racial profiling (paras 8 and 18) Residential segregation (para 13) Achievement gap in education (para 14) Differential access to health care (para 15) Disproportionate incarceration (para 20)

CERD Concluding Observations
14-page document (25 Sep 2014) available online Concerns and recommendations “The Committee recommends that the State party adopt a national action plan to combat structural racial discrimination” (para 25) “The Committee recommends that the State party increase its efforts to raise public awareness and knowledge of the Convention throughout its territory” (para 32)

American Public Health Association National Campaign Against Racism
Active website: Coming soon: Anti-Racism Collaborative with seven Collective Action Teams Communication and Dissemination Education and Development Global Matters Liaison and Partnership Organizational Excellence Policy and Legislation Science and Publications

Dual Reality: A restaurant saga
My second story, “Dual Reality: A restaurant saga,” was inspired by an experience I had as a medical student. Several friends and I had spent a long day studying. It was now evening and we were now hungry, so we went into town to find a place to eat.

I looked up and noticed a sign . . .
DOOR We walked into a restaurant, sat down, ordered our food, the food was served, and we were eating. Nothing remarkable so far. You have all probably had that experience! But as I was eating, I looked up and noticed a sign, and seeing that sign was a revelation to me about racism. I looked up and noticed a sign . . .

OPEN The sign said “Open”.
I could have thought no more about it. After all, I was sitting at the table of opportunity and eating with a sign proclaiming “Open” to me. But I knew something about the two-sided nature of those signs. I realized that actually, the restaurant was now . . .

CLOSED Racism structures “Open/Closed” signs in our society.
. . . “Closed”, and that hungry people just a few feet away from me, but on the other side of the sign, would not be able to come in and eat. It is important to know about the two-sided nature of these signs. Racism structures “Open/Closed” signs in our society. Racism structures “Open/Closed” signs in our society.

Those on the outside are very aware of the two-sided nature
DOOR Two-sided signs create a dual reality, experienced differently depending on where you stand. Those on the inside may not even be aware that there IS a sign. It is difficult to recognize a system of inequity that privileges us. However, those on the outside are very aware of the two-sided nature of the sign. Those on the outside are very aware of the two-sided nature of the sign. It is difficult to recognize a system of inequity that privileges us.

Is there really a two-sided sign? Hard to know, when only see “Open”.
DOOR Back inside the restaurant, we realize: It is hard to know there is a two-sided sign when you only see “Open”. Indeed, it is a privilege for those inside, not to have to know. But once they do know, those inside can choose to act. Knowledge about the existence of two-sided signs is not scary. It is empowering. Is there really a two-sided sign? Hard to know, when only see “Open”. A privilege not to HAVE to know. Once DO know, can choose to act.

Life on a Conveyor Belt: Moving to action
My final story, “Life on a Conveyor Belt: Moving to action” is sparked by Dr. Beverly Daniel Tatum’s image of racism as a conveyor belt on which people live their ordinary lives, not aiming to be racist but inexorably moving toward racism through their benign inaction. I will be acting this story out. Life on a Conveyor Belt: Moving to action

Racism is most often passive
Here we are on a crowded conveyor belt moving steadily toward racism. Most folks around us do not even look up to understand or acknowledge where we are going. And when someone DOES look up and see racism, they might close their eyes (which is denial of racism), or turn and face the other way (which is color blindness). Racism is most often passive, and often shows up as inaction in the face of need.

1. Name racism But if WE don't want to be part of racism, we have to turn around and walk in the opposite direction at least as fast as the belt is moving. And what happens when we do that? We will bump into people, and they will shout “Hey Buddy, watch out! Where you are going?”. Our first task is to name racism, to point out where the belt is headed and to ask “Do you really want to go there?”. Some people will grumble and say “Just get out of my way,” but one or two others may turn and join us.

2. Ask “How is racism operating here?”
So now we are two or three people walking against the crowd. And as we continue to bump into people and name racism, others will join us but most will want to remain undisturbed. As we gain in numbers and speed, where are we headed? To examine and dismantle the conveyor belt motor. Our second task is to ask “How is racism operating here?”, looking at the mechanisms of racism in our structures, policies, practices, norms, and values.

3. Organize and strategize to act
Finally reaching the motor, we may say “I think it works by this lever.” And we yank on the lever, and the conveyor belt stutters. However, it is a very smart system and [rwooop] reconfigures itself. Our third task is to organize and strategize to act, coordinating with others who are attacking different parts of the motor. Working together, we CAN dismantle racism and put in its place a system where all people can know and can develop to their full potentials.

Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD
Immediate Past President American Public Health Association Senior Fellow Satcher Health Leadership Institute and Cardiovascular Research Institute Morehouse School of Medicine (404) (404) mobile

“Reactions to Race” module
Six-question optional module on the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System since 2002

“Reactions to Race” module Question 1
How do other people usually classify you in this country? Would you say: White Black or African-American Hispanic or Latino Asian Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander American Indian or Alaska Native Some other group Don’t know / Not sure Refused The first question on the module is “How do other people usually classify you in this country? Would you say White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native Hawaiian, American Indian, or some other group?” You will note that we are NOT asking about self-identified “race”/ethnicity, which is already asked on the core portion of the BRFSS questionnaire. You will also note by the response categories that this question does not make an artificial distinction between so-called “race” and so-called “ethnicity”, but includes “Hispanic” as a possible way that other people usually classify you. We call this variable “socially assigned race” because . . .

How often do you think about your race? Would you say: Never Once a year Once a month Once a week Once a day Once an hour Constantly Don’t know / Not sure Refused The first question on the module is “How do other people usually classify you in this country? Would you say White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native Hawaiian, American Indian, or some other group?” You will note that we are NOT asking about self-identified “race”/ethnicity, which is already asked on the core portion of the BRFSS questionnaire. You will also note by the response categories that this question does not make an artificial distinction between so-called “race” and so-called “ethnicity”, but includes “Hispanic” as a possible way that other people usually classify you. We call this variable “socially assigned race” because . . .

Within the past 12 months at work, do you feel you were treated worse than, the same as, or better than people of other races? Worse than other races Same as other races Better than other races Worse than some races, better than others Only encountered people of the same race Don’t know / Not sure Refused The first question on the module is “How do other people usually classify you in this country? Would you say White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native Hawaiian, American Indian, or some other group?” You will note that we are NOT asking about self-identified “race”/ethnicity, which is already asked on the core portion of the BRFSS questionnaire. You will also note by the response categories that this question does not make an artificial distinction between so-called “race” and so-called “ethnicity”, but includes “Hispanic” as a possible way that other people usually classify you. We call this variable “socially assigned race” because . . .

Within the past 12 months when seeking health care, do you feel your experiences were worse than, the same as, or better than for people of other races? Worse than other races Same as other races Better than other races Worse than some races, better than others Only encountered people of the same race No health care in past 12 months Don’t know / Not sure Refused The first question on the module is “How do other people usually classify you in this country? Would you say White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native Hawaiian, American Indian, or some other group?” You will note that we are NOT asking about self-identified “race”/ethnicity, which is already asked on the core portion of the BRFSS questionnaire. You will also note by the response categories that this question does not make an artificial distinction between so-called “race” and so-called “ethnicity”, but includes “Hispanic” as a possible way that other people usually classify you. We call this variable “socially assigned race” because . . .

Within the past 30 days, have you experienced any physical symptoms, for example a headache, an upset stomach, tensing of your muscles, or a pounding heart, as a result of how you were treated based on your race? Yes No Don’t know / Not sure Refused The first question on the module is “How do other people usually classify you in this country? Would you say White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native Hawaiian, American Indian, or some other group?” You will note that we are NOT asking about self-identified “race”/ethnicity, which is already asked on the core portion of the BRFSS questionnaire. You will also note by the response categories that this question does not make an artificial distinction between so-called “race” and so-called “ethnicity”, but includes “Hispanic” as a possible way that other people usually classify you. We call this variable “socially assigned race” because . . .

Within the past 30 days, have you felt emotionally upset, for example angry, sad, or frustrated, as a result of how you were treated based on your race? Yes No Don’t know / Not sure Refused The first question on the module is “How do other people usually classify you in this country? Would you say White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native Hawaiian, American Indian, or some other group?” You will note that we are NOT asking about self-identified “race”/ethnicity, which is already asked on the core portion of the BRFSS questionnaire. You will also note by the response categories that this question does not make an artificial distinction between so-called “race” and so-called “ethnicity”, but includes “Hispanic” as a possible way that other people usually classify you. We call this variable “socially assigned race” because . . .

Jurisdictions using the “Reactions to Race” module
2002 to 2014 BRFSS Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Palau

Arizona 2012 2013 2014 Arkansas 2004 California 2002 Colorado Connecticut 2010 Delaware 2005 DC Florida Georgia Indiana 2009 Kentucky Massachusetts 2006 2008 Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Nebraska New Hampshire New Mexico North Carolina Ohio 2003 2011 Rhode Island 2007 South Carolina Tennessee Vermont Virginia Washington Wisconsin Wyoming Palau

Socially-assigned “race”
How do other people usually classify you in this country? Would you say: White Black or African-American Hispanic or Latino Asian Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander American Indian or Alaska Native Some other group

Socially-assigned “race”
On-the-street “race” quickly and routinely assigned without benefit of queries about self-identification, ancestry, culture, or genetic endowment Ad hoc racial classification, an influential basis for interactions between individuals and institutions for centuries Substrate upon which racism operates Jones CP, Truman BI, Elam-Evans LD, Jones CA, Jones CY, Jiles R, Rumisha SF, Perry GS. Using “socially assigned race” to probe White advantages in health status. Ethn Dis 2008;18(4):

General health status Would you say that in general your health is:
Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor

82

83

84

General health status and “race”
Being perceived as White is associated with better health

Self-identified ethnicity
Are you Hispanic or Latino? Yes No

Self-identified “race”
Which one or more of the following would you say is your race? White Black or African-American Asian Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander American Indian or Alaska Native Other

Self-identified “race”/ethnicity
Hispanic “Yes” to Hispanic/Latino ethnicity question Any response to race question White “No” to Hispanic/Latino ethnicity question Only one response to race question, “White” Black Only one response to race question, “Black” American Indian/Alaska Native Only one response to race question, “AI/AN”

How usually classified by others
Two measures of “race” How usually classified by others White Black Hispanic AIAN . . . 26,373 98.4 0.1 0.3 1.1 5,246 0.4 96.3 0.8 2.2 How self-identify Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 89

Two measures of “race” How usually classified by others White Black Hispanic AIAN . . . 26,373 98.4 0.1 0.3 1.1 5,246 0.4 96.3 0.8 2.2 1,528 26.8 3.5 63.0 1.2 5.5 How self-identify Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 90

Two measures of “race” How usually classified by others White Black Hispanic AIAN . . . 26,373 98.4 0.1 0.3 1.1 5,246 0.4 96.3 0.8 2.2 1,528 26.8 3.5 63.0 1.2 5.5 How self-identify Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 91

Report excellent or very good health
General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race", 2004 100 80 60 58.6 53.7 percent of respondents 40 39.8 20 Hispanic-Hispanic Hispanic-White White-White Report excellent or very good health Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 92

Test of H0: That there is no difference in proportions
General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race", 2004 100 Test of H0: That there is no difference in proportions reporting excellent or very good health Hispanic-Hispanic versus White-White p < 80 60 58.6 percent of respondents 40 39.8 20 Hispanic-Hispanic White-White Report excellent or very good health Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 93

General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race", 2004 100 Test of H0: That there is no difference in proportions reporting excellent or very good health Hispanic-Hispanic versus Hispanic-White p = 80 60 53.7 percent of respondents 40 39.8 20 Hispanic-Hispanic Hispanic-White Report excellent or very good health Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 94

General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race", 2004 100 Test of H0: That there is no difference in proportions reporting excellent or very good health Hispanic-White versus White-White p = 80 60 58.6 53.7 percent of respondents 40 20 Hispanic-White White-White Report excellent or very good health Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 95

Two measures of “race” How usually classified by others White Black Hispanic AIAN . . . 26,373 98.4 0.1 0.3 1.1 5,246 0.4 96.3 0.8 2.2 1,528 26.8 3.5 63.0 1.2 5.5 321 47.6 3.4 7.3 35.9 5.8 How self-identify Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 96

Two measures of “race” How usually classified by others White Black Hispanic AIAN . . . 26,373 98.4 0.1 0.3 1.1 5,246 0.4 96.3 0.8 2.2 1,528 26.8 3.5 63.0 1.2 5.5 321 47.6 3.4 7.3 35.9 5.8 How self-identify Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 97

Report excellent or very good health
General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race", 2004 100 80 60 58.6 52.6 percent of respondents 40 32 20 AIAN-AIAN AIAN-White White-White Report excellent or very good health Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 98

General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race", 2004 100 Test of H0: That there is no difference in proportions reporting excellent or very good health AIAN-AIAN versus White-White p < 80 60 58.6 percent of respondents 40 32 20 AIAN-AIAN White-White Report excellent or very good health Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 99

General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race", 2004 100 Test of H0: That there is no difference in proportions reporting excellent or very good health AIAN-AIAN versus AIAN-White p = 80 60 52.6 percent of respondents 40 32 20 AIAN-AIAN AIAN-White Report excellent or very good health Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 100

General health status, by self-identified and socially-assigned "race", 2004 100 Test of H0: That there is no difference in proportions reporting excellent or very good health AIAN-White versus White-White p = 80 60 58.6 52.6 percent of respondents 40 20 AIAN-White White-White Report excellent or very good health Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 101

Two measures of “race” How usually classified by others White Black Hispanic AIAN . . . 26,373 98.4 0.1 0.3 1.1 5,246 0.4 96.3 0.8 2.2 1,528 26.8 3.5 63.0 1.2 5.5 321 47.6 3.4 7.3 35.9 5.8 > 1 race 406 59.5 22.5 3.8 5.3 8.9 How self-identify Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 102

Two measures of “race” How usually classified by others White Black Hispanic AIAN . . . 26,373 98.4 0.1 0.3 1.1 5,246 0.4 96.3 0.8 2.2 1,528 26.8 3.5 63.0 1.2 5.5 321 47.6 3.4 7.3 35.9 5.8 > 1 race 406 59.5 22.5 3.8 5.3 8.9 How self-identify Camara Phyllis Jones, MD, MPH, PhD 103

Being perceived as White is associated with better health Even within non-White self-identified “race”/ethnic groups

Being perceived as White is associated with better health Even within non-White self-identified “race”/ethnic groups Even within the same educational level

Being perceived as White is associated with better health Even within non-White self-identified “race”/ethnic groups Even within the same educational level Being perceived as White is associated with higher education

Key questions Why is socially-assigned “race” associated with self-rated general health status? Even within non-White self-identified “race”/ethnic groups Even within the same educational level Why is socially-assigned “race” associated with educational level?

Racism A system of structuring opportunity and assigning value based on the social interpretation of how we look (“race”), which Unfairly disadvantages some individuals and communities Unfairly advantages other individuals and communities Saps the strength of the whole society through the waste of human resources Jones CP. Confronting Institutionalized Racism. Phylon 2003;50(1-2):7-22. Jones CP, Truman BI, Elam-Evans LD, Jones CA, Jones CY, Jiles R, Rumisha SF, Perry GS. Using “socially assigned race” to probe White advantages in health status. Ethn Dis 2008;18(4):

Strategies for achieving health equity
To change opportunity structures Understand the importance of history Challenge the narrow focus on the individual Expose the “myth of meritocracy” Examine successful strategies from outside the US

To change opportunity structures Understand the importance of history Challenge the narrow focus on the individual Expose the “myth of meritocracy” Examine successful strategies from outside the US Acknowledge existence of systems and structures View systems and structures as modifiable

To change opportunity structures Understand the importance of history Challenge the narrow focus on the individual Expose the “myth of meritocracy” Examine successful strategies from outside the US Acknowledge existence of systems and structures View systems and structures as modifiable Break down barriers to opportunity Build bridges to opportunity

To change opportunity structures Understand the importance of history Challenge the narrow focus on the individual Expose the “myth of meritocracy” Examine successful strategies from outside the US Acknowledge existence of systems and structures View systems and structures as modifiable Break down barriers to opportunity Build bridges to opportunity Transform consumers to citizens Intervene on decision-making processes

To change opportunity structures Understand the importance of history Challenge the narrow focus on the individual Expose the “myth of meritocracy” Examine successful strategies from outside the US Acknowledge existence of systems and structures View systems and structures as modifiable Break down barriers to opportunity Build bridges to opportunity Transform consumers to citizens Intervene on decision-making processes To value all people equally Break out of bubbles to experience our common humanity Embrace ALL children as OUR children

Anti-Racism Collaborative Communication and Dissemination
Guiding questions How can we support the naming of racism in all public and private spaces? What tools and strategies are needed to start community conversations on racism?

Anti-Racism Collaborative Communication and Dissemination
Guiding questions How can we support the naming of racism in all public and private spaces? What tools and strategies are needed to start community conversations on racism? Possible activities Expand the APHA Webinar Series on Racism and Health Convene Regional Town Halls on Anti-Racism and Health Develop a toolbox of communication tools and strategies

Anti-Racism Collaborative Education and Development
Guiding questions How can we support training around issues of “race”, racism, and anti-racism at educational institutions of all levels? How does effective anti-racism curriculum look?

Anti-Racism Collaborative Education and Development
Guiding questions How can we support training around issues of “race”, racism, and anti-racism at educational institutions of all levels? How does effective anti-racism curriculum look? Possible activities Convene anti-racism scholars and activists Develop curricula for schools of public health and medicine Establish an APHA Fellowship on Anti-Racism and Health

Anti-Racism Collaborative Global Matters
Guiding questions How can we use the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) to support anti-racism work in the United States? What can we learn from anti-racism work in other nations?

Anti-Racism Collaborative Global Matters
Guiding questions How can we use the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) to support anti-racism work in the United States? What can we learn from anti-racism work in other nations? Possible activities Disseminate information on US obligations under ICERD Scan anti-racism efforts in other countries Contribute to a global conversation on social equity

Anti-Racism Collaborative Liaison and Partnership
Guiding questions What anti-racism work is happening at the community level? What anti-racism work is happening in other sectors? How can we create linkages?

Anti-Racism Collaborative Liaison and Partnership
Guiding questions What anti-racism work is happening at the community level? What anti-racism work is happening in other sectors? How can we create linkages? Possible activities Catalog and connect local anti-racism efforts Develop an anti-racism commitment agreement for partner organizations

Anti-Racism Collaborative Organizational Excellence
Guiding questions How do we answer the question “How is racism operating here?” in each of our settings? How do we examine structures, policies, practices, norms, and values?

Anti-Racism Collaborative Organizational Excellence
Guiding questions How do we answer the question “How is racism operating here?” in each of our settings? How do we examine structures, policies, practices, norms, and values? Possible activities Develop tools to discern historical and contemporary mechanisms of institutionalized racism Establish a National Advisory Committee on Anti-Racism and Health

Anti-Racism Collaborative Policy and Legislation
Guiding questions What are current policy and legislative strategies to address and dismantle racism? What new strategies should we propose?

Anti-Racism Collaborative Policy and Legislation
Guiding questions What are current policy and legislative strategies to address and dismantle racism? What new strategies should we propose? Possible activities Catalog anti-racism policies across jurisdictions Propose new areas for legislation Disseminate model legislation

Anti-Racism Collaborative Science and Publications
Guiding questions What research has been done to examine the impacts of racism on the health and well-being of the nation and world? What intervention strategies have been evaluated? What are next steps?

Anti-Racism Collaborative Science and Publications
Guiding questions What research has been done to examine the impacts of racism on the health and well-being of the nation and world? What intervention strategies have been evaluated? What are next steps? Possible activities Develop a compendium of measures of racism Link anti-racism researchers in collaborative work Develop a science of anti-racism

Japanese Lanterns: Colored perceptions
My first story, “Japanese Lanterns: Colored perceptions,” was inspired by a garden party I attended several years ago. It was a lovely affair on a balmy summer night, and after much small talk I settled myself into a corner of the garden to quietly enjoy the strains of music and conversation floating by.

As I sat there, I found myself gazing at a group of pink moths fluttering nearby.
Then I noticed a group of green moths a bit further on, and a group of blues moths beyond those. And I marveled at how the moths had sorted themselves, each with its own kind.

I turned and saw that at another part of the garden, the moths were yellow, purple, and orange, again naturally sorting themselves each with its kind. Then with a jolt I reminded myself that moths are not pink, or purple, or blue, or yellow, green, or orange.

The colors we think we see are due to the lights by which we look.
Moths DO come in different colors, but these are shades of tan and brown, speckled and splotched. The colors we think we see are due to the lights by which we look. These colored lights distort and mask our true variability, which can only be seen under a full-spectrum light. The colors we think we see are due to the lights by which we look. These colored lights distort and mask our true variability.

A social classification, not a biological descriptor.
What is “race”? A social classification, not a biological descriptor. The social interpretation of how one looks in a “race”-conscious society. So what is “race”? How do the racial categories that we construct color our vision of who we are? “Race” is a social classification, not a biological descriptor. It is the social interpretation of how one looks in a “race”-conscious society.

Achieving Health Equity

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Achieving Health Equity"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Achieving Health Equity

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Achieving Health Equity"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback