Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

NO SILO… NO SOLO… NO BOZO !

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "NO SILO… NO SOLO… NO BOZO !"— Presentation transcript:

1 NO SILO… NO SOLO… NO BOZO !
Enterprise DevOps NO SILO… NO SOLO… NO BOZO ! * This is not the full deck but a glimpse of the presentation for ideation

2 What is DevOps Development team is responsible for adding new features in the software Operation team is responsible for keeping the system stable and running A scientific data driven approach to product / project development Using automation, manage infrastructure as a code. Better collaboration between developers and operations Adopting best practices between developers and operations. DevOps is the union of people, process and products to enable continuous delivery of value to our end users Dev Ops

3 You build it, you run it. - Werner Vogels (CTO, Amazon)
A fool with a tool is still a fool Add another

4 Continuous Integration
DevOps PLAN CODE BUILD TEST RELEASE OPERATE COLLABORATION DEPLOY DevOps VALUE Continuous Delivery Continuous Integration Agile Development DEV OPS

5 DevOps vs. Enterprise DevOps
1-10  Number of Apps  50-500 5-20  Number of Environments   Years of Operation  30+ 1-100  Size of IT Team  0-1  No. of Acquisitions  25 (1/month) Ironic T-shirts, Jeans  Default Attire  Business Casual Startup Enterprise When software releases fail… What could possibly go wrong? Customers unable to purchase startup t-shirts for work. Someone has to call up your 10 customers to apologize. Banks fail. CEO has to address failure in CNBC interview.

6 Reduced cycle times and higher deploy rates
Key Business Values Time to Market Reduced cycle times and higher deploy rates Cost Efficiency Increasing automation eliminates effort, thereby significantly reducing labor costs Higher Stability All changes can be tested against the entire canonical software system resulting in higher stability Frequent Releases Deliver features more often - Automating the process removes the operational constraint Production Ready Code Releasing software does not require additional effort, version is always ready for release “Go Live is a NON-EVENT”

7 Infrastructure on Demand
Culture Infrastructure on Demand Microservices Continuous Delivery Enterprise DevOps Our Model Organization Structure Collaborate Tools Immutable Infrastructure Automated Provisioning Monitoring & Alerting Conway’s law Single Responsibility Capability Containers Continuous Integration Automated Testing Automated Deployment

8 Pre DevOps Structures Anti-Type B Separate DevOps Silos Anti-Type C
“We don’t need Ops” Dev Ops DevOps Anti-Type A Dev Ops Separate Silos Introduce our team structures Lets call it Anti-Type A Some other examples Anti Type A – Throw it over the wall model. Story “Done” means dev complete. Anti Type B – Manager decides we need some bit of Devops. The members of the DevOps team quickly form another silo, keeping Dev and Ops further apart than ever as they defend their corner, skills, and toolset from the ‘clueless Devs’ and ‘dinosaur Ops’ people. Anti Type C – With cloud Ops is the thing of the past. underestimate the complexity and importance of operational skills and activities, and believe that they can do without them, or just cover them in spare hours.

9 DevOps Team Structures
Type 1 Smooth Collaboration Type 2 Fully Embedded Type 3 Temporary DevOps Team Type 1 Smooth Collaboration model needs quite substantial organisational change to establish it, and a good degree of competence higher up in the technical management team. Dev and Ops must have a clearly expressed and demonstrably effective shared goal Type 1 suitability: an organisation with strong technical leadership. Potential effectiveness: HIGH Type 2– hugely effective with single product focus. Facebook is an example Might also be called NoOps, in a definition that there is no distinct Ops team. May not work with multiple products, and end up going to Type 1 with frequent context switching required. Type 2 suitability: organisations with a single main web-based product or service. Potential effectiveness: HIGH Type 3 - A team (perhaps a virtual team) within Dev then acts as a source of expertise about operational features, metrics, monitoring, server provisioning, etc., and probably does most of the communication with the IaaS team. Type 5 suitability: as a precursor to Type 1 topology, but beware the danger of Anti-Type B. Potential effectiveness: LOW to HIGH Anti Type B will Possibly transition to Type 5 and then to Type 1 with a clear mandate to dissolve the team in a short time frame Anti-Type C DevOps topology will probably end up needing either a Type 3 (IaaS)or a Type 4 DevOps topology (DevOps-as-a-Service)  The product set of the organisation: fewer products make for easier collaboration, as there will be fewer natural silos, as predicted by Conway’s Law. The extent, strength, and effectiveness of technical leadership; whether Dev and Ops have a shared goal. Whether an organisation has the capability or appetite to change its IT Operations department from ‘racking hardware’ and ‘configuring servers’ to real alignment with the value stream, and for operational features to be taken seriously by software teams. Whether the organisation has the capacity or skills to take the lead on operational concerns. Dev Ops Dev Ops Dev DevOps Ops

10 Tools Landscape Highlight tools that we used. Continuous Integration
Testing Build & Deploy CI Server Unit Testing Code Quality Automated Acceptance NFR Testing Highlight tools that we used. Version Control Configuration Management & Environment Provisioning Monitoring & Alerts Project & Support Management Source Control Binary Management Productivity Add On Application & Infra Monitoring Log Monitoring Collab / Community Chat Project Lifecycle Management Service Desk Source Control Binary Management Productivity Add On

11 NO SILO NO SOLO NO BOZO So what makes it work?
An organization is made of separate entities for legal, professional or historical reasons. This should not lead to silo mentality. Solo behaviors are often a selfish expression. Teamwork is always superior. No one is bigger than a team. No team is bigger than the company. We want people to have fun, to enjoy working together. But this is above all a serious place to work in and to deliver against our clients’ or company’s objectives with enthusiasm, passion and laughs... There is no room for bozos.


Download ppt "NO SILO… NO SOLO… NO BOZO !"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google