Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Analysis of case-cohort data: A comparison of different methods

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Analysis of case-cohort data: A comparison of different methods"— Presentation transcript:

1 Analysis of case-cohort data: A comparison of different methods
N. Charlotte Onland-Moret, Daphne L. van der A, Yvonne T. van der Schouw, Wim Buschers, Sjoerd G. Elias, Carla H. van Gils, Jeroen Koerselman, Mark Roest, Diederick E. Grobbee, Petra H.M. Peeters  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology  Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007) DOI: /j.jclinepi Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

2 Fig. 1 (a) Mean distance between the vectors of the estimated coefficients in a full-cohort analysis and the case-cohort models; the influence of subcohort size with fixed full-cohort size (n=1,000) and fixed number of failures (n=93). (b) Mean deviation (Hilbert–Schmidt norm) for the full-cohort and case-cohort covariance matrices, which is a measure for the difference between the SE. The influence of subcohort size with fixed full-cohort size (n=1,000) and fixed number of failures (n=93). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology  , DOI: ( /j.jclinepi ) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

3 Fig. 2 (a) Mean distance between the vectors of the estimated coefficients in a full-cohort analysis and the case-cohort models. The influence of varying full-cohort sizes with fixed incidence rate (∼8%) and a fixed subcohort size (10%). (b) Mean deviation (Hilbert–Schmidt norm) for the full-cohort and case-cohort covariance matrices, which is a measure for the difference between the SE. The influence of varying full-cohort sizes with fixed incidence rate (∼8%) and fixed subcohort size (10%). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology  , DOI: ( /j.jclinepi ) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

4 Fig. 3 (a) Mean distance between the vectors of the estimated coefficients in a full-cohort analysis and the case-cohort models. The influence of number of failures with fixed full-cohort size (n=2,000) and a fixed subcohort size (10%). (b) Mean deviation (Hilbert–Schmidt norm) for the full-cohort and case-cohort covariance matrices, which is a measure for the difference between the SE. The influence of number of failures with fixed full-cohort size (n=2,000) and fixed subcohort size (10%). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology  , DOI: ( /j.jclinepi ) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Analysis of case-cohort data: A comparison of different methods"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google