Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PowerPoint Supplement Richard P. Farkas, DePaul University

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PowerPoint Supplement Richard P. Farkas, DePaul University"— Presentation transcript:

1 PowerPoint Supplement Richard P. Farkas, DePaul University
POWER & CHOICE An Introduction to Political Science 14th Edition W. Phillips Shively, University of Minnesota PowerPoint Supplement Richard P. Farkas, DePaul University

2 Chapter 10 Elections

3 The appeal of elections
… ooze legitimacy … invite respectability … cause many to assume democracy … illuminate “choice” … demonstrate “participation” … can serve non-democratic objectives

4 Elections & Inexperience
In new, transitional or failing states, elections suffer from problems of -- Weak or non-existent communication capacities Limited or non-existent government, party, or candidate resources Violence, ethnic conflict, illiteracy

5 Elections functions: select leaders / policies mobilize; build support
tough questions: Is the outcome in doubt? Are the choices significantly different? Do the mechanics of the elections reinforce or undermine the citizens’ choices?

6 Types choosing leadership or policies
typical labels: “election” “referendum” Electoral systems: SMDP vs. PR mechanics, advantages, biases of each

7 Single-member-district plurality
SMDP: name provides detail … Political system divided into districts One winner in each district Winner is the candidate with the largest number of votes Upside: direct link – leader to constituency Downside: lost voices of losers Upside/downside: distribution of voters = crucial

8 Proportional Representation
PR: name provides detail … a political system has x number of representatives to be elected. all political parties create a composite list of their candidates (for all the seats) if a political party gets ALL the votes, it gets all the seats if it gets a percentage of the votes, it gets that percentage of the seats

9 PR Upside: the pattern of votes cast by citizens is
reflected in the elected representatives; minorities have a voice and all votes “count” wherever they may be located Downside: because names are taken from the party lists (top to bottom order), folks in one place may not perceive that they have a specific representative to whom they can turn for service; party loyalty is much more important in a PR system

10 Other dimensions … Referendum … more “democratic?”
more power, more choice? more problems … ? Participation … more “democratic?”

11 Electoral Participation
Who? logic? reasoning? “paradox of voting” no one who is sensible should vote How much is “best?” comparing … Bases for choices: long vs. short term party, race, gender, age, region, language, ethnicity, economic role, other

12 Examples Text: Israel Nigeria Others worth investigating: Bosnia Iraq
Mexico


Download ppt "PowerPoint Supplement Richard P. Farkas, DePaul University"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google