Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Navigating Research Governance, Ethics and Sponsorship

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Navigating Research Governance, Ethics and Sponsorship"— Presentation transcript:

1 Navigating Research Governance, Ethics and Sponsorship
Andrew Johnston Research Management & Governance (RM&G) Manager

2 Overview Governance and Ethics - Why do we need it? Setting up a study
Funding your Project NIHR Portfolio Patient Carer Public Involvement (PCPI) Research Sponsorship Gaining Regulatory Authorisations Local site set-up/Assess, Arrange and Confirm HRA – Changing times Running the study Informed Consent Source Documentation Site files & Essential documentation Good Clinical Practice (GCP) NuTH R&D figures

3 Some terms before we begin……..
GCP: Good Clinical Practice Sponsor: Responsible Party for the Research Recruitment: Sample Population Consented Feasibility: Assessment of Capacity and Do-ability REC: Research Ethics Committee CTIMP: Clinical Trial of Investigational Medicinal Product ATMP: Advanced Therapy Investigational Medicinal Product MHRA: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency HRA: Health Research Authority

4 Why do we need Research Governance?
Episodes in history have shaped the regulation of research led to the introduction of governance and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) World War II & Nuremberg Trials (Declaration of Helsinki in the foundation of the ethical principles) Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment (US Study - 40 year study on progression of syphilis) More recently…… Bristol and Alder Hey investigations into retained organs - Research Governance Framework implemented in 2001 Northwick Park, UK - Monoclonal antibody drug, 6 participants required treated for organ failure Biotrial, France - Phase 1 endocannibanoid, neurodegenerative diseases and anxiety, 1 dead, 5 others injured

5 What is Ethics, GCP & Governance?
Ethics: Moral principles that govern a person's behavior or the conduct of an activity GCP: Good Clinical Practice (GCP) is an international ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording and reporting trials that involve the participation of human subjects Governance: Establishment of policies, and continuous monitoring of their proper implementation, by the members of the governing body of an organisation

6 The Process – setting up a research study at NuTH
What do I need to do?

7 1. Design & Costings Funding application Study design
2. Identify research sponsor Funding Awarded Choose an appropriate methodology & outcome Provide justification of the sample size Draw up a statistical analysis plan Data Handling Prepare and present interim reports 3. Complete IRAS application and proctocol Research Sponsorship & governance Portfolio Adoption Provide document set to other sites/trusts for review 4. Submit for regulatory approval HRA submission NHS Governance NHS Ethics Researcher to respond to queries/meet conditions of approval HRA approval 5. NHS site(s) confirm capacity Start study

8 Points to consider at conception
What type of trial is it? Does it require specialised departments? How many NHS Sites are involved? What is the per patient cost? Are there storage/transport costs? Have the right NHS staff been involved? Will the study be eligible for portfolio adoption? Does it involve a CTU? Who is the Sponsor?

9 Definitions of types of NHS costs:
Research Costs - the costs of the R&D itself that end when the research ends. They relate to activities that are being undertaken to answer the research questions – funded by the Grant / Fellowship NHS Support Costs - the additional patient care costs associated with the research, which would end once the R&D study in question had stopped, even if the patient care involved continued to be provided NHS Treatment Costs - the patient care costs, which would continue to be incurred if the patient care service in question continued to be provided after the R&D study had stopped – funded by usual commissioning sources NHS Excess Treatment Costs - an extra cost which is in addition to that of standard treatment

10 The NIHR Portfolio The National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) Portfolio is a database of high-quality research studies that are eligible for support from the NIHR Clinical Research Network in England. Automatically eligible: Have some or all research funding provided by the NIHR, Other areas of central Government or NIHR non-commercial partners. Fulfil the research definition “attempt to derive generalisable new knowledge by addressing clearly defined questions with systematic and rigorous methods” Potentially eligible: Commercial Overseas Government Overseas Charities

11 2. Identified research sponsor
1. Design & Costings Funding application Study design Funding Awarded 2. Identified research sponsor Choose an appropriate methodology & outcome Provide justification of the sample size Draw up a statistical analysis plan Data Handling Prepare and present interim reports 3. Complete IRAS application and proctocol Research Sponsorship & governance Portfolio Adoption Provide document set to other sites/trusts for review 4. Submit for regulatory approval HRA submission NHS Governance NHS Ethics Researcher to respond to queries/meet conditions of approval HRA approval 5. NHS site(s) confirm capacity Start study

12 Sponsorship - Research Governance Framework (RGF)
The Research Governance Framework (RGF) was developed by the DoH to set out the principles, requirements and standards for healthcare research (2001). Ethics Science Health & Safety Information Finance Quality Research Culture All research conducted in the NHS must have an identified Research Sponsor. - an individual or organisation that takes on responsibility for ensuring proper arrangements to initiate, finance, monitor and manage a study -

13 4. Submit for regulatory approval
1. Design & Costings Funding application Study design Funding Awarded 2. Identified research sponsor Choose an appropriate methodology & outcome Provide justification of the sample size Draw up a statistical analysis plan Data Handling Prepare and present interim reports 3. Complete IRAS application and proctocol Research Sponsorship & governance Portfolio Adoption Provide document set to other sites/trusts for review 4. Submit for regulatory approval HRA submission NHS Governance NHS Ethics Researcher to respond to queries/meet conditions of approval HRA approval 5. NHS site(s) confirm capacity Start study

14 Authorisations/Regulatory Approval
HRA Research Ethics Committee (REC) Look at the ethical issues that may arise from the research & ensure the participant has all the information required to make an informed decision. ** Proportionate Review ** HRA NHS review (Replaces R&D approval) Assessment of governance and legal compliance Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) The UK competent authority – approve the use of Investigational Medicinal Products and Devices The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) regulations 2000 (IRMER) Ionising radiation (CT Scans, X-Ray) require a IRMER review from a radiation expert. Administration of Radioactive Substance advisory Committee (ARSAC) Radioactive substances used in research (MUGA Scans, PET Scans) – site specific Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) Patient information NHS Sites Confirm Capability and capacity

15 What can I do to help? Summary of main points to consider:
Finance – all costs must be funded Support Departments - Pharmacy, Radiology, Labs, Ophthalmology… Insurance/Indemnity – management/conduct/design Study Agreements – use of model agreement is encouraged Publicity Risk to the Trust – will it attract media attention? Ethics, HRA, Regulatory Approvals Data – Caldicott approval, CAG, if necessary Tissue/IRMER/ARSAC – bio-banking Site Specific requirements – staffing support, suitable facilities available? Pharmacy Details – exit strategy

16 A recent HRA replaces the need for Trust NHS R&D approval….

17 HRA Approval What they say…
HRA Approval is relatively the new process for the NHS in England that brings together the assessment of governance and legal compliance, undertaken by the HRA, with an independent REC opinion provided through the UK research ethics service.   What they say… The new system will simplify the approvals process for research, making it easier for research studies to be set up. The elimination of duplicate application routes means that the answers to research questions about how to improve patient care or about new treatments will be answered quicker.

18 HRA Application received REC validation Initial Assessment
Pharmacy information complete REC review HRA assessment Pharmacy technical assurance REC Favourable Opinion Collate approvals What happens within the HRA Ready for Review Ensure enough info to take assessment forward Provide the REC with confirmation of insurance arrangements, legal compliance, internal consistency, etc Confirm to applicant AND sites that certain things are in place so that the next phase of setting study up can occur – ie that assessment and arrangements can formally be in place. Letter includes what agreement will be used, if a PI/Local Collaborator /none are needed, what HR arrangements are needed. Will also try to get to a point where we are clear about what the assessment will sort so that sites do not need to do. HRA Approval

19 5. NHS site(s) confirm capacity
1. Design & Costings Funding application Study design Funding Awarded 2. Identified research sponsor Choose an appropriate methodology & outcome Provide justification of the sample size Draw up a statistical analysis plan Data Handling Prepare and present interim reports 3. Complete IRAS application and proctocol Research Sponsorship & governance Portfolio Adoption Provide document set to other sites/trusts for review 4. Submit for regulatory approval HRA submission NHS Governance NHS Ethics Researcher to respond to queries/meet conditions of approval HRA approval 5. NHS site(s) confirm capacity Start study

20 Good Clinical Practice (GCP)
GCP is an international ethical and scientific quality standard for the design, conduct, recording and reporting of trials that involve the participation of human subjects. Its purpose is to: Ensure the protection of the rights and well being of research participants Ensure that results of research are accurate and credible The principles of Good Clinical Practice have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and apply to ALL research, not just clinical trials of medicinal products!

21 Informed Consent for Research
Informed consent is a three step process which involves: • The giving of study related information • The discussion and clarification of this information and • The taking of the subject’s written consent All individuals asked to consider taking part in research should be given the fullest possible information, presented in a form that is understandable. This must include, but is not limited to, the Participant Information Sheet (PIS) approved by a REC. ** Participants must be given enough time to read the information about the Research - this is usually at least 24 hours except in an acute or emergency setting

22 Source documentation Source data: Source documents: Case Report Forms:
Details of clinical findings, observations or other activities carried out as part of clinical trial. Source data are contained in source documents (original documents or certified copies) copies of PIS and consent form to be filed in patient record original to be stored in the site file documented consent process & confirmation of eligibility detail each study visit Source documents: Original documents, data and records (e.g. hospital records, clinical charts, laboratory notes, memoranda, subject diaries or evaluation checklists), pharmacy dispensing records, adverse event charts Case Report Forms: Data generated by clinical trials are normally recorded in Case Report Forms (CRFs). A CRF is a printed or electronic document designed to record all of the protocol defined data on individual participants in a CTIMP. For further details please refer to the JRO website - SOP essential and source documentation guide (release date Nov. 2013)

23 Essential study documents
Trial Master File/Site file Protocol Ethics HRA Regulatory Research Team Participant Information (including subject log + original consent form Data Collection Safety Pharmacy/Product-Related 10. Monitoring and Audit 11. SOPs 12. Correspondence (except Trust & Ethics)

24 In summary….. Monitoring Amendments Record keeping Safety reporting
Design Question Statistics Feasibility/Consultation Documents Funding Sponsor Input Set-up Approvals Implement Processes Coordinate Centres Registration Continuation Monitoring Amendments Record keeping Safety reporting Data Queries Close-Down Site Close down Final Monitoring Visit Archiving Publication Write up Publish Reports

25 R&D Figures NuTH is one of the largest research Trusts within the country! Number of active recruiting studies: 295 (NuTH sponsored) 1211 (all studies) (commercial) 875 (non-commercial) Number of patients recruited overall 2015/2016: 16,414 Number of patients recruited to portfolio studies 2015/2016: 12,122

26 Get in touch… Please visit our website for guidance: (under revision) You can contact our Inbox: Or call us:


Download ppt "Navigating Research Governance, Ethics and Sponsorship"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google