1. 7.2: Nationalism
“…figure is not known as an Eagle, but looks more like a Turkey. For the truth, the Turkey is in comparison a much more respectable bird”
- Ben Franklin
Minilesson: Nationalism Video: The Presidents: Madison  Monroe

2. Marshall Court ( )
McCulloch [winner] v. Maryland (1819)  MD tried to tax BUS w/in state lines (illegal under strict interpret of Const.)
- SC: BUS legal  elastic clause
- loose interpret
- deny states’ rights to tax fed agency
Gibbons [winner] v. Ogden (1824)  NY monopoly to Ogden to ferry Hudson R. – Congress already gave Gibbons one
- river navigation = “interstate”  in Const. only Congress can regulate commerce
- NY’s grant illegal (federal supremacy)

3. Foreign Policy during Monroe’s Admin
Sec’y of State John Quincy Adams  expansionist
Important post-war treaties under JQA include…
Rush-Bagot Treaty (1817)
- demilitarization of US-Canada border
- border 49th parallel
- joint occupation of Oregon Territory
Adams-Onis Treaty (1819)
- US and Spain complete US acquisition of Florida

5. Danger Zone – Monroe Doctrine
US 1st to recognize independent LA countries
fear France try to reacquire
Monroe Doctrine approved by Congress – US acts independently
- no Euro colonization in W Hemisphere
- no Euro intervention in LA countries
- US would not interfere in Euro
US military too weak to enforce?
GB honored it  trade w/ US

9. Slavery and Missouri Compromise
nationalism united US
question of slavery threatened to divide
1819 Missouri seeks statehood as slave state
issue: if admitted, slave states gain one-vote adv. over free states in Congress
1820 H of R Speaker (Henry Clay) proposed Missouri Comp
- Maine enter as free state
- Missouri enter as slave state
*** in the rest of the La. Territory north of 36’30° slavery prohibited
Issue of slavery on the horizon  ?????

11. Marshall Court
Case: Marbury v Madison (1803)
Background:
- Pres. Adams appointed Marbury “midnight” judge
- papers signed but not delivered
- new pres (TJ) ordered Sec’y of State (Madison) not to deliver appointment
- Marbury appealed to SC
Const. Issue:
- Const. does not specify SC has power of “judicial review”
Decision:
- Marbury had right to appointment
- Marbury entitled to some remedy under US law
- ruled Judiciary Act unconstitutional – Congress did not have power to make the law
- “judicial review”: SC is final judge if law is constitutional or unconstitutional

12. Marshall Court
Long Term Impact
- check on other two branches by determining what is the “supreme law of the land“
- can determine any law unconstitutional