Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Gap Closing Instruction in Action

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Gap Closing Instruction in Action"— Presentation transcript:

1 Gap Closing Instruction in Action
Presented by Jessica Harding, 8th Grade Teacher and Vince Lindsey, Principal Massillon Junior High School November 17, 2016

2 Origins Situation: Addressing the issue of closing the achievement gap in Mathematics between non-identified students and students with disabilities. First Several Years: All the students with disabilities that were assigned on Mr. Reed’s caseload, received specially designed instruction in a full inclusion classroom. One Gen Ed Teacher (Harding) and one IS (Reed). Last Year: Branched out to include 2 Gen Ed Teachers and one IS : Our model has expanded to include 4 Gen Ed classrooms and one IS.

3 Overall 8th Grade We (4 Gen Ed, 2 IS) serve…
300 total 8th grade students in a full inclusion setting (no resource room pull-out) 17% are identified as SWD - ID (CD), LD, ED, MD, Autism, OHI... 4% have 504 plans 2% are ELL/ESOL These students are spread among minute math classes: Pre-Algebra, Algebra 1, Geometry

4 Our Students We (2 Gen Ed, 1 IS) serve…
130 total 8th grade students in a full inclusion setting (no resource room pull-out) 25% are identified as SWD - ID (CD), LD, ED, MD, Autism, OHI, ... 3% have 504 plans 1% are ELL/ESOL These students are spread among 5 80-minute Pre-Algebra classes.

5 maintained or improved their performance level from 7th grade PARCC
How is it working for our students? Exponent (EE.1) Pre-Data Post-Data All Students - 33% All Students - 65% +32% SWD - 8% SWD - 56% +48% Gap = 25% Gap = 9% Angle Relationships (G.5) Pre-Data Post-Data All Students - 36% All Students - 78% +42% SWD - 19% SWD - 75% +56% Gap = 17% Gap = 3% AIR Results Spring 2016 (Ohio’s State Assessment) Non-Identified Students: 59% SWD: 73% maintained or improved their performance level from 7th grade PARCC

6 Our Planning Time Previous Years
-No common planning time, so we met for 1-2 hours outside of school hours each week (am or pm) and -Complete 8th grade math TBT meets three days each week for 40 minutes -Our mini-TBT meets two to three days each week for an additional 40 minutes

7 How do we begin to co-plan to co-serve?
What standard(s) will we be teaching the following week? What are the key element(s) of those standards? What are the “must-knows” by the end of the week? Where is each student toward mastering those “must-knows”?

8 Our Typical Daily Classroom Plan
Warm-Up (5-10 minutes) Instruction (10 minutes) Practice (10-15 minutes) Q&A/Progress Monitoring (5 minutes) Re-Arrange This gives us the flexibility to group, combine classes, tier activities, work one-on-one, pair, etc.

9

10 A Recent Lesson... Topic: Scatter Plots and Trend Lines
Goal: All students will construct and interpret scatter plots, fit a trend line, and write the equation of the trend line in y=mx+b, interpreting slope and intercept. 8.SP.1,2,3 Timeline: 5 days Pre-Data: 59% All students at or above mastery 32% SWD at or above mastery Gap = 27%

11 Days 1 and 2 *Followed the typical plan, with high-interest activities involving celebrities, fast food, and real data *Worked whole group briefly, pairs, and One-on-one *Collected student mastery data throughout

12 Days 3,4,5 *Students completed one of three activities: Monopoly Task (Level 1) Real-World Data Task (Level 2) What Would You Sell? PBL Task (Level 3) *Day 5 included a gallery walk with the combined classes sharing their findings for the tasks

13

14 Post-Data: 80% All students at or above mastery +21%
76% SWD at or above mastery +44% Gap: 4% (-23%)

15 Creating Groups *Our groups are always mixed and based on data - SWD are not automatically in the lowest group when we tier/level *We use a variety of methods to create groups - mixed readiness, levels, tiers, etc. - based on the data we collect. *Often, we create groups by combining students from both classes and use all of our resources to work with students where they are.

16 AIR Review Rotations

17 AIR Review Rotations - The Groups

18 Kirby’s Daily Schedule (2016-2017)
Block 1 (80 minutes) - Travel between Harding and Ruffner classrooms while co-teaching Block 2 (80 minutes) - Travel between Harding and Enrichment Time minutes (focus on IEP goals, intervention) Block 3 (80 minutes) - Co-teach an ELA class

19 Barriers to Success *Adult Resistance *Student’s Prior Knowledge *Time
*Student Insecurity *Resources *Adult Prior Knowledge

20 Describe Pre-Algebra in 2 words

21 Questions? Contact Us! Jessica Harding jharding@massillonschools.org
Vince Lindsey


Download ppt "Gap Closing Instruction in Action"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google