Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byStuart Anthony Modified over 6 years ago
1
A Returnability Study of BYUH Alumni (1993-2007 Graduates)
Return Migration A Returnability Study of BYUH Alumni ( Graduates) Elaine Walton Wendel Walton Samantha Palefau Thomas Dearden
2
Four-Phase Project Pilot study Online alumni survey
Follow-up telephone interviews In-country interviews
3
Online Alumni Survey (n = 675)
4
Demographics 95.2% LDS 56.2% female
68.9% married (21% married to an American) 72.1% employed full time 32.8% enrolled in or completed graduate school 46.2% currently residing in the U.S. 63 countries represented * Is that 21% of the married ones are married to an American or 21% of the total?
5
Major Countries Represented
Hong Kong (11.7%) New Zealand (7.1%) Japan (6.7%) Samoa (5.5%) Fiji (4.7%) Taiwan (4.7%) Philippines (4.1%) Tonga (4.1%) Korea (3.9%) French Polynesia (3.3%) Canada (3.3%) *
6
Primary Questions for Investigation
Satisfaction with BYUH? Post-BYUH success? Returnability Current and planned residence? Correlates for return home? (opinions and motivations) *
7
Foci for Data Analysis Home country (four economic regions)
Current residence Graduation year ( )
8
Current Residence by Graduation Year
* This is interesting…
9
Current Residence by Home Region
*
10
Current Residence by Spouse’s Home Country
* n = 413 (X2 = 96.35; df = 2; p < .001)
11
Current Residence by Academic Major
*
12
Satisfaction with BYUH Preparation for . . .
I would probably put “Strongly agree” at the top, and “Slightly agree” at the bottom. Not necessary though, just an idea. n = 644
13
Most Important Aspect of BYUH Experience
14
Most Important Aspect by Home Region Testimony versus Career
(X2 = ; df = 3; p = .008) (X2 = 7.323; df = 3; p = .062)
15
In Retrospect, Would Choose Again
16
Relevance of Academic Majors (Majors most frequently cited)
Would choose again Wouldn’t choose again Major not relevant Accounting (17.1%) Information systems (20.4%) Information systems (17.1%) Information systems (15.1%) Hosp. and tour mgmt. (11.8%) Psychology (9.6%) Intern. Bus. Mgmt. (11.1%) Intern. Bus. Mgmt. (9.0%) Social Work (9.6%) TESOL (6.0%) Accounting (7.7%) Accounting (7.5%) Psychology (5.7%) TESOL (7.2%) Hosp. and Tour. Mgmt. (7.5%) Intern. Cult. Studies (5.4%) Social Work (6.8%) Intern. Bus. Mgmt. (6.2%) Social Work (4.9%) Psychology (5.4%) Intern. Cult. Studies (4.8%) Do these percentages only include the “Definitely” choices? So the other 75.2% of Accounting majors for example were in the “maybe” answers? (Percent of total)
17
Relevance of Academic Majors (Percent within major)
Would choose again Wouldn’t choose again Major not relevant Computer science (78%) Hawaiian Studies (100%) Accounting (77%) History (80%) Int. Cultural Studies (76%) Hospitality & Tour Mgmt (65%) Special Ed. (75%) Art (71%) Pacific Island Studies (62.5%) Pacific Island Studies (50%) Political science (71%) Elementary Ed. (50%) Math (45%) Biology (68%) Special Ed. (50%) Psychology (44%) Exercise & Sports Science (67%) English (46%) Social Work (42%) Do these percentages only include the “Definitely” choices? So the other 75.2% of Accounting majors for example were in the “maybe” answers?
18
Helpful Resources * Is this from the question that asks if they WERE helpful to them, or if they WOULD be helpful in general? n = 608
19
Helpful Resources over Time BYUH Career Services
* (X2 = ; df = 6; p = .075)
20
Satisfaction with Employment and BYUH Preparation for Employment
* n = 517
21
Difficulty Finding Employment at Home by Region
Mean rating on 6-point scale * (F = 2.514; df = 3; p = .058)
22
Graduate School Attendance by Home Region
* (X2 = ; df = 3; p < .001)
23
Church Activity by Home Region
Mean score on a 4-pont scale (4-8) * (F = 4.658; df = 3; p = .003)
24
Church Activity by Current Residence
Mean score on 4-pont scale (4-8) * (F = 7.981; df = 2; p < .001)
25
Church Leadership by Current Residence (Male)
* (X2 = 6.629; df = 2; p = .036)
26
Church Leadership by Current Residence (Female)
* (X2 = ; df = 2; p = .002)
27
Advantages and Disadvantages of Remaining (U.S. Residents Only)
* (n = 259)
28
Advantages and Disadvantages of Returning (U.S. Residents Only)
* I switched this slide with the next one so it’s Returning then Remaining, like the previous pair (n = 259)
29
Trends Over Time (1993-2007) Increasing Decreasing
emphasis on career (contrasted with strengthened testimony) access to BYUH career services and LDS Employment Services difficulty finding employment at home Decreasing satisfaction with employment satisfaction with BYUH experience and preparation for employment positive attitude about returning home attendance in graduate school Church activity and Church leadership experience community service *
30
Follow-up Telephone Interviews with Alumni (n = 50)
31
Common Themes Gratitude for BYUH experience Returnability
Multicultural environment Strengthened testimony Returnability Sacrifice to return, but worthwhile Exception Risks associated with remaining in the U.S. Difficulty finding a job in home country Wish for more help in preparation for job search More hands-on experiences and Internships Career services General suggestions Importance of English skills Identify appropriate major early
32
In-Country Interviews Church leaders LDS Business Executives Seminary & Institute Coordinators Alumni (N = 72)
33
Sample of Nine Countries
Japan Korea Hong Kong Taiwan Singapore Philippines Indonesia New Zealand Australia
34
Focus of Interviews Returnability
Career preparation (relevance of BYUH major) History of successful employment Preparation for leadership Support for returning graduates Recruitment
35
Returnability Graduates needed at home
Graduates who remained in U.S. are worse off Dissenting opinions
36
Career Preparation Appropriate majors
Business (especially accounting) in all countries Computer science (IT and IS) in all countries Science and engineering (New Zealand) Social sciences (NZ, AU, Singapore) In Asia majors selected by test scores Students unprepared to choose a major Enhanced curriculum, individual guidance, & assertiveness training needed Academic performance more important than choice of major
37
Successful Employment
Success in Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore (mostly business and computer-related jobs) Koreans struggle (mostly teaching English and employed by the Church) Developing countries Record poor for obtaining good jobs Many entrepreneurial opportunities Pacific Underemployment Most jobs unrelated to BYUH education
38
Preparation for Leadership
Gratitude for BYUH Church experience Many graduates in leadership positions
39
Support for Returning Graduates
Networking difficult from a distance Alumni chapters not well organized LDS Employment Resource Centers helpful in a few countries
40
Recruitment Recruit only those who have made a commitment to return (Japan and Korea) Focus on middle class – poor students less likely to return (Philippines and Indonesia) Resistance to BYUH recruitment (New Zealand and Australia)
41
Academic Standing of BYUH (Common Theme)
BYUH unknown or known for lack of rigor Standing not important in developing countries Desire to raise academic standard Problematic for those who need BYUH most Need to clarify BYUH’s mission
42
Alignment of Universities (Common Theme)
British educational system No G.E. courses More lengthy focus on specialization BYUH graduates’ qualifications not recognized BYUH admission standards Problem accepting “O Levels” Problem requiring “A Levels” Compensating Factors Innovation and creative thinking Ethical foundation
43
Ideas for Volunteering
Mentoring database in Australia Participation in BYUH entrepreneurial efforts Japanese workshop for BYUH students BYUH International Service Center in Hong Kong Entrepreneurial internships in Indonesia and Philippines
44
Recommendations Define returnability more broadly.
Increase the international flavor of BYUH. Develop strong connections to key countries. Enhance BYUH Career Services Strengthen BYUH’s relationship to BYU Enhance marketing efforts. Address alignment issues. Revisit the mission of BYUH. Periodic evaluation
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.