1. RQM 310: ICD Review – Compare & Contrast
LPD-17 San Antonio, SBIRS, F-35B, XM-25
June 8, 2015

2. Lesson Objectives
Develop a more “discerning eye” when reviewing capability identification documents
Compare and contrast three actual ICDs
One JCIDS compliant, one partially compliant and one non-compliant
Build a bridge between old documents and current guidance

3. First, some questions…

4. Is JCIDS Broken? Could it be that:
JCIDS (the process) is NOT focused on materiel solutions – YET the people doing JCIDS analysis may be?
Does JCIDS fully account for existing & non-materiel solutions? and
Is the analysis supposed to exhaust those possibilities before identifying materiel approaches?
Everything in the Pentagon is risk-averse & overly bureaucratic—not just JCIDS? AND the JS intentionally built JCIDS that way - and intended it to be that way?
As a taxpayer, do you want everything vetted at every level?
Whether or not it is the “right” answer?
That nobody disagrees with?
Build
Build
Build
Build

5. Bad ICDs?
There are many BAD ICDs that the validation authorities approve. Why?
Time
Apathy / lack of equity
Expertise
“Back scratching mentality”
Nobody reads them / who cares
Great brief - bad ICD
Is it the process — or lack of discipline inside the process? Both? Neither? Why?
Build
Build
Build

6. ICD Titles Why might a simple title be so important?
How about these ICD titles?
Biometric Enabling Capability (BEC)
Combat Identification – Friendly Force Tracking (CID-FFT)
Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV)
Improved Cargo Airdrop Capability (ICAdC)
Light Mobility Aircraft (LiMA)
Future Cargo Aircraft (FCA)
Infectious Disease Countermeasures (IDCM)
Light Utility Helicopter (LUH)
Vessel-to-Shore Bridging (VSB)
Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV)
Build
Build

7. JCIDS ICD Compliance

8. Compliance Two parts to compliance Capstone guidance for CBAs / ICDs
Content – does underlying analysis meet the intent of guidance?
Format – does the document comply with JCIDS Manual?
Capstone guidance for CBAs / ICDs
Validation of an ICD ensures the
Capability requirements and proposed IOC/FOC meet National Military Strategy (NMS) and Combatant Commander (CCMD) need
Capability requirements are prioritized and do not provide unnecessary redundancy across the Joint Force

9. Compare & Contrast Limitations:
No usable ICDs developed under current JCIDS guidance:
Hence, focus on content, not format
J8 JCIDS intent remains basically the same
Slight change in emphasis with new format
Build
Build

10. Document Content Changes ICD
Jan 2012
Feb 2015
Cover Page
Executive Summary
Sections
CONOPS Summary
JCAs
Capability Requirements
Capability Gaps and Overlaps/Redundancies
Threat and Operational Environment
Assessment of Non-Materiel Approaches
Final Recommendations
Appendices
Architecture Data
References
Acronym List
Glossary
10 pages*
Cover Page
Validation Page
Executive Summary
Sections
Operational Context
Threat Summary
Capability Requirements and Gaps/Overlaps
Assessment of Non-Materiel Approaches
Final Recommendations
Appendices
References
Acronym List
Glossary
Classified Annex (optional)
13 Pages**
ICD Changes: Validation page added; body reduced from 7 to 5 section.
ICD page limits:
Cover Page, Validation Page and Executive Summary are all limited to one page
Body of the ICD, 5 sections, limited to 10 pages*
Appendices: Appendix A, B and C do not have a page limit.
Appendix A: DODAF architecture data is referred to by URL location prior to listing references
Appendix D, Classified Annex, if used, counts against the 10 page body limit
*This is a change from 2012 – in 2012 the 10 page limit applied to the body (7 sections) and Appendix A.
* In 2012 the 10 page limit applied to the body (7 sections) and Appendix A
** In 2015, the 10-page limit applies only to the body (5 sections)

11. What’s In A Title? JROC approved all three
Jun “Armed Aerial Scout” (AAS, sponsor: USA)
Apr “Airborne Strategic Deterrence” (ABSD, sponsor: USAF)
May 2013: “Joint Health Risk Management” (JHRM, sponsor: USNORTHCOM)
Build
Build

12. 1. Concept of Operations Summary
­Describe the relevant parts of the Joint Concepts, CONOPS, and/or Unified Command Plan (UCP) - assigned mission to which the capability requirements identified in the ICD contribute
­What operational outcomes they provide
­How they complement the integrated joint / multinational warfighting force
­What enabling capabilities are required to achieve the desired operational outcomes.

13. Armed Aerial Scout (AAS) 1. Concept of Operations Summary
Identify the UCP-assigned mission
“The fundamental purpose of an Armed Aerial Scout is to conduct armed reconnaissance, security operations, and attack missions in support of full spectrum operations. In doing so, it improves the commander's ability to maneuver and concentrate superior combat power against the enemy at the decisive time and place.” (FM3-04, Attach Rec Helo Ops, 2007)
Operational outcomes
“The precise application of combat power and effective synchronization of maneuver and supporting fires require a current and accurate picture of the enemy's current dispositions and activity within a given area of operations. An Armed Aerial Scout plays a critical role in providing this information and provides advantages over other intelligence sources by countering enemy deception efforts, providing improved real-time situational awareness and assessing terrain.”
Build
Armed Aerial Scout (AAS) CONOPS (Build Slide)
Identify a Unified Command Plan (UCP) - assigned mission?
This slide shows that Armed Aerial Scout (AAS) ICD does not meet the letter or intent of addressing how the capability meets a UCP-assigned mission.
The paragraph makes no mention of any UCP-assigned mission.
… to conduct armed reconnaissance, security operations, and attack missions in support of full spectrum operations.
Operational outcomes?
The slide shows that the sponsor failed to provide any operational outcomes associated with the desired capability.
The mention of what an AAS will do shows that the sponsor had a solution in mind while writing the ICD.
The paragraph does not mention what outcomes must be attained and indicates a lack of analysis.
Does the ICD mention Integrated into a Joint / Multinational fight?
The ICD makes no mention of how AAS will integrate into the Joint Force or any enabling capabilities required to employ the AAS.
Does the ICD Identify enabling capabilities?
The ICD makes no mention any enabling capabilities required to employ the AAS.
AAS is a solution, not a capability.
Build

14. Airborne Strategic Deterrence (ABSD) 1. Concept of Operations Summary
Identify the UCP-assigned assigned mission
CDRUSSTRATCOM is the lead combatant commander for strategic deterrence planning and is responsible for executing strategic deterrence operations.” Unified Command Plan, 17 Dec 2008, p. 27
The capabilities identified in this Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) directly contribute to the deterrence mission as identified in USSTRATCOM’s Deterrence Operations Joint Operating Concept (DO JOC) , tasks established in the Unified Command Plan and requirements …….
Operational outcomes
(a) assure friends and allies, (b) dissuade potential adversaries from developing or expanding inventories of (c) deter potential adversaries
Integrate into the joint / multinational warfighting force
deterrence capabilities complement the joint warfighter’s integrated campaign plan -- preventing the need to escalate to armed conflict.
Airborne Strategic Deterrence (ABSD) CONOPS
Identify a Unified Command Plan (UCP) - assigned mission?
Sponsor makes clear linkage to both the UCP and the STRATCOM Joint Operating Concept.
Airborne Strategic Deterrent (ABSD) is a capability not a solution.
What operational outcomes are provided?
Sponsor provides clear operational outcomes, assure, deter and dissuade.
They have a more strategic focus than operational but that is inherent in nuclear deterrence.
JCIDS has to be flexible to accommodate.
Does the ICD mention Integrated into a Joint / Multinational fight?
Sponsor discusses integrating into a joint campaign plan.
It is more difficult to show because if deterrence is effective, then no campaign plan is executed.

15. Airborne Strategic Deterrence (ABSD) 1. Concept of Operations Summary
Identify enabling capabilities to achieve operational outcome
Enabling capabilities required to achieve Assurance, Dissuasion And Deterrence (ADD) include:
an understanding of allied and adversary goals, priorities and values
an effective Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) providing early warning, assessing programs and threats, adversary behaviors and intentions, targeting, and post attack analysis
a secure, survivable Command, Control and Communications
the building and cultivation of strategic partners
the maintenance of a robust and responsive conventional and nuclear industrial base to sustain capabilities over time and
an effective hedge against technical and/or geopolitical uncertainties.
ABSD CONOPS Summary
Does the ICD Identify enabling capabilities?
Sponsor provides a reasonable list of enabling capabilities.
The point is not to debate if the list is complete but to ensure consideration is given.
We are not grading their homework or analysis, but ensuring that analysis was done.

16. 2. Joint Capability Areas (JCAs)
Cite the applicable Tier 1 and Tier 2 JCAs
Range of military operations
Timeframe for IOC based upon input from CCMD / AQ
Relevant Integrated Security Constructs (ISC), if applicable
Joint Capability Area
(Talking Points) Particular attention should be focused on timeframe and DPSs.
Timeframe is important to ensure capability can be delivered when required and will be reviewed during the AoA review and CDD review.
DPSs (ICSs) are important to ensure analysis is conducted against joint-approved scenarios and cover the ROMO to identify tasks, conditions and standards.
­Cite the applicable Tier I and II JCAs from reference hh , and
­The range of military operations being addressed.
­Identify the timeframe under consideration for initial operational capability based on input from supported/supporting CCMDs and the acquisition community.
­Also identify the Relevant Defense Planning Scenarios (DPS) (ICS), if any, applicable to this ICD.
Integrated Security Constructs (ISCs)
ISCs contain scenarios for major combat operations.
Military objectives of the ISCs provide a source for developing the list of required capabilities.
Developed as part of the DoD Analytic Baseline in accordance with DoDD and DoDI
Integrated Security Constructs (ISCs) - Developed as part of the DoD Analytic Baseline. ISCs contain scenarios for major combat operations. Military objectives of the ISCs provide a source for developing the list of required capabilities.

17. Armed Aerial Scout (AAS) 2. Joint Capability Areas (JCAs)
Cite the applicable JCAs
Battlespace Awareness
Force Application
Command and Control
Net-Centric
Range of military operations
Conventional Warfare
Forcible Entry
Unconventional Warfare
Show of Force
Peace Enforcement
Peacekeeping Operations
Normal and Routine Military Operations
Timeframe
timeframe from 2015 through approximately 2024
Relevant Defense Planning Scenarios (DPS) (ICS) - ?????
AAS JCAs
Cite the applicable Tier 1 and Tier 2 JCAs
AAS does list applicable JCAs and they seem appropriate.
Again, ensuring they are addressed is more important than grading whether they are perfect
Range of military operations seems appropriate however, the disconnect is in the last main bullet.
Another indicator that no analysis was conducted.
No DPSs are cited so what was the basis for the list of missions in the ROMO?
Timeframe for IOC based upon input from CCMD / AQ -- The timeframe seems tight—this was a 2009 document and they are looking at 2015.
Nothing gets fielded from an ICD in 6 years unless buying COTS.
Relevant Defense Planning Scenarios (DPS) (ICS), if applicable
The timeframe should align with the DPSs but there are no DPSs and no indication of what really drove this timeframe

18. Airborne Strategic Deterrence (ABSD) 2. Joint Capability Areas (JCAs)
Cite the applicable JCAs
ABSD capabilities reside in FA, supporting the Maneuver and Engagement Tier 1 & 2 JCAs
Supporting capability areas include: Battlespace Awareness (BA), Command and Control (C2), Corporate Management (CM), Force Support (FS), Net Centric (NC) and Protection (FP)
Range of military operations
Deterrence capabilities are applicable across the entire Range of Military Operations (ROMO)
Timeframe
a 2020 threat environment.
Relevant Defense Planning Scenarios (DPS – now ISC)
The ABSD CBA was informed by Defense Planning Scenarios (DPS) 2-4 (Bipolar, Multi-polar and Global Insurgency worlds) . Table 2.1 lists the Steady State Security Posture (SSSP) vignettes
Airborne Strategic Deterrence JCAs
Cite the applicable JCAs
ABSD does list applicable JCAs that seem appropriate.
Range of military operations
The sponsor states that deterrence occurs across the ROMO and essentially expands the role of traditional nuclear deterrence to a broader mission area
Timeframe
The timeframe is 2020 based on the expected service life of the Air Launch Cruise Missile.
Relevant Defense Planning Scenarios (DPS) (ICS)
Sponsor clearly states which DPSs were selected as the basis of the analysis.

19. 3. Capability Requirements
Describe capabilities required in CBA or other study
Why are they essential to Sponsor to achieve goals / objectives
Relate to Concept, CONOPs, UPC-assigned mission
Address compliance with OSD, Joint, National, International, policies and regulations
Define capability requirements in JCA lexicon
UJTLs / METLs
Relevant Range of Military Operations
Timeframe Under Consideration
Operational attributes, qualitative parameters, metrics
Minimum value below which capability will no longer be effective
Covers what is required to be in this section of an ICD.
Capability requirements and capability gaps must be described in terms of the ISCs assessed on achieving the relevant military objectives
Capability requirement table added
UJTL: Universal Joint Task List
METL: Mission Essential Task List

20. Armed Aerial Scout (AAS) 3. Capability Requirements
Describe capabilities required in CBA
…the need for an Armed Aerial Scout to enable dominant maneuver for the joint air-ground maneuver force by providing aggressive combined arms reconnaissance.
Why are they essential for JFC to achieve objectives
The Joint Force Commander (JFC) requires a relatively low cost, armed aerial scout platform that requires minimal training support, is supportable within the planned logistics environment, affordable with the planned level of logistics resources throughout the lifecycle, and is interoperable with organic and joint fires systems and manned/unmanned aviation platforms.
Build
requires a relatively low cost
AAS Required Capability (BUILD SLIDE)
Paragraph basically articulates Army doctrine for armed reconnaissance.
Describe capabilities required in CBA (How do you do an AoA on this?)
The paragraph makes no mention of how these capabilities were derived through analysis.
This section needs to discuss how capabilities were derived from the CBA and the inability of the programmed force to conduct assigned tasks for the scenario.
Why are they essential for JFC to achieve objectives
The paragraph about the JFC objectives makes no mention of contributing to a JFC objective.
These objectives should be derived from the ISCs. JFCs do not care about cost, training, life cycle costs, etc. That is Service responsibility, not a JFC concern.
Another indication that the Sponsor already had acquisition considerations in mind and no analysis was conducted.
affordable with the planned level of logistics
resources throughout the lifecycle
Build

21. Armed Aerial Scout (AAS) 3. Capability Requirements
Capability is required to comply with OSD, Joint, National policies
????????
Identify JCAs to which capability contributes
Force Application
Command and Control
Net-Centric
Protect
Use JCAs to describe capabilities
The Armed Aerial Scout capability gap has been repeatedly identified in studies and analysis including: …….
current rotary wing aircraft employed by Army aviation in the armed reconnaissance role have shortcomings in performance, lethality, interoperability and survivability.
Build
AAS Required capability (cont) (BUILD SLIDE)
Capability is required to comply with OSD, Joint, National policies
The ICD makes no mention of linkage or tie into OSD, Joint or national policies
Identify JCAs to which capability contributes
ICD does bin JCAs
Use JCAs to describe capabilities
The “Use JCAs to Describe Capabilities” section is a red flag with the comment about being shortfalls being repeatedly identified in previous studies and discussing current shortfalls in capability.
Both are indications that no analysis of operating in a future environment was conducted.
Previous studies, etc are not inherently bad, but the capability must be delivered for anticipated future scenarios not current or past operations.
One of the challenges with this ICD is that it’s looking backward vs forward
AAS “gap” is identified in previous studies dating from
1987, Applying the NTC Experience: Tactical Reconnaissance (RAND)
1991, Value of Army Aviation Reconnaissance Literature Review
1992, Armed Reconnaissance/Scout/Light Attack Helicopter Force Multiplier (Burdeshaw)
1993, Bottom-Up Review
1993, Measuring the Value of Scout/Reconnaissance (RAND)
, Manned and Un-Manned (MUM) I-IV Studies
2002, Defense Planning Guidance 04 Helicopter Study
2003/2008 USCENTAF Lessons Learned from OIF/OEF (Unclassified)
capability gap has been repeatedly identified in previous
studies and analysis
Build
8 Studies

22. Airborne Strategic Deterrence (ABSD) 3. Capability Requirements
Describe capabilities required in CBA
These required capabilities (listed alphabetically) from the CBA formulated the ICD recommendations.
(U) Adaptable
(U) Clear/Visible.
(U) Credible
(U) Effective.
(U) Endurable.
(U) Global in Coverage.
(U) Persistently Present.
(U) Responsive.
(U) Survivable.
(U) Tailorable.
Required Capability ABSD
Describe capabilities required in CBA
ABSD does a good job of clearly listing the capabilities required by the airborne leg of the Triad to assure, deter and dissuade, ie achieve the operational outcomes.

23. Airborne Strategic Deterrence (ABSD) 3. Capability Requirements
Capability is required to comply w/OSD, Joint, National policies
above capabilities are essential because they provide credible deterrent tools to the National Command Authority and the Joint Force Commander to achieve military objectives which support Assurance, Dissuasion and Deterrence (ADD).
Identify JCAs to which capability contributes
directly support both Maneuver and Engagement in the Force Application (FA) Tier 1 JCAs.
Use JCAs to describe capabilities
The ABSD capabilities do not apply to any Tier 1 & Tier 2 JCAs that have been prioritized by the SWarF process. The STRATCOM SWarF process identified nuclear strike attributes but did not prioritize JCAs
These capabilities are rooted in previous USSTRATCOM deterrence analysis and refined in the USSTRATCOM Senior Warfighter Forum (SWarF). A crosswalk of SWarf attributes with ABSD capabilities is found in Appendix I
Required Capability ABSD (cont)
Capability is required to comply with OSD, Joint, National policies
ABSD sponsor links strategic deterrence to the tools required by both the NCA and the JFC to comply with National, OSD and Joint policies to assure, deter and dissuade
Identify JCAs to which capability contributes
The sponsor ties the required capabilities to Engage and Maneuver JCAs.
This is tough because there are no JCAs for deterrence and these JCAs are really when deterrence fails.
They did the best they could given the uniqueness of this mission set.
Use JCAs to describe capabilities
Deterrence is not well articulated in the JCA construct so it is difficult to align to the JCAs for required capabilities to ASSURE, DETER and DISSUADE.

24. 4. Capability Gaps, Overlaps, & Redundancies
Describe the missions, tasks, and functions that cannot be performed or are unacceptably limited
Describe capability gaps or overlaps in terms of the difference between capability requirements in Sec 3 and performance of current / projected force
Proficiency, sufficiency, capability does not exist or needs to be replaced
Identify capability overlaps and / or redundancies
Link to CONOPs, UCP mission, etc
Prioritize capability gaps based upon operational risk
Rules for capabilities
Contain operational attributes
General enough to not prejudice outcome in favor of a particular means
4. Capability Gaps/Overlaps/Redundancies
(Talking Points) Covers what is required to be in this section of an ICD.
Points worthy of discussion are the difference between sufficiency and proficiency and the
importance of linking CONOPs to UCP missions to CBA results deriving capability gaps and shortfalls into required capabilities.
This enables you to better prioritize risk because you can tie it to mission outcomes.
Describe the mission, tasks, and functions that cannot be performed or are unacceptably limited
Include considerations of capabilities provided by other DoD components, Interagency, Allies / Partners
Capability gaps are assessed in terms of the risk to mission, risk to force, other important considerations
Assess if overlap is advisable for operational redundancy or should be evaluated for as potential tradeoff
Proficiency – cannot accomplish the mission to level expected -- Sufficiency – do not have enough to be effective
Lack of existing capability
Need for replacement due to aging, fatigue life, tech obsolescence, etc of existing capability
Policy limitations
The lack of existing capability, etc are still in the CBA guide section but not in the ICD template

25. Armed Aerial Scout (AAS) 4. Gaps, Overlaps, Redundancies
Describe the missions, tasks, and functions that cannot be performed or are unacceptably limited
They are not sufficiently deployable to permit rapid concentration of aviation combat power to support a brigade combat team within 96 hours after liftoff, a division within 120 hours, and five divisions within 30 days. They do not have sufficient responsiveness in terms of speed and range to support operations across the entire area of operation forecast for the Division area in the future Modular Force…………
Proficiency, Sufficiency, capability does not exist or needs to be replaced - ???????
Identify capability overlaps and / or redundancies
the capability described in this ICD should provide a solution to the armed aerial scout capability gaps resulting from the limitations of currently employed armed reconnaissance helicopters
Link to CONOPs, UCP mission, etc - ????
Build
concentration of aviation
combat power to support a brigade combat team within 96 hours after liftoff, a
Build
division within 120 hours, and five divisions within 30 days.
AAS Capability Gaps/Overlaps/Redundancies (BUILD Slide)
AAS does a very poor job of describing what cannot be accomplished.
The verbiage is not tied to any DPS requiring deploying a brigade combat team within 96 hours after liftoff, a division within 120 hours, and five divisions within 30 days.
Even if this were a valid requirement, is the inability to do this (and they have not said they can’t, only that it is a requirement) is the problem with the Army or the TRANCSOM. This could be a shortfall in strategic lift.
The ICD does not say how much speed or how much responsiveness is required or what bad will happen if not met.
 The AAS ICD makes no reference to proficiency or sufficiency
 What is inherently wrong with 3rd bullet?? – ICDs Don't provide Solutions
The AAS does not address capability gaps, overlaps or redundancies.
Instead, it describes what the solution must be able to do in order to overcome limitations in current platforms.
ICDs do not describe solutions, just capability gaps and required capabilities. Those should be framed for a future operating environment vice correcting current shortfalls.
The AAS ICD had no linkages to CONOPs, UCPs, etc and made no effort to prioritize gaps in ICD based upon operational risk (ICD Table 4). Another indication that no CBA was performed.
Build
solution
Build

26. Airborne Strategic Deterrence (ABSD) 4. Gaps, Overlaps, Redundancies
Describe the missions, tasks, and functions that cannot be performed or are unacceptably limited
Capability Gaps. [Remainder of paragraph REDACTED].
Proficiency, Sufficiency, capability does not exist or needs to be replaced
Determination of shortfalls as proficiency or sufficiency
The capability shortfalls discussed above exist now
Identify capability overlaps and / or redundancies
There are no excess deterrence capability overlaps or redundancies in the 2020 timeframe
Link to CONOPs, UCP mission, etc
required capabilities support the Nuclear Response (NR) CONOPS requirement for Force Application…as follows:
ABSD Capability Gaps/Overlaps/Redundancies
The ABSD ICD was classified SECRET so the capability gaps and shortfalls were redacted to security issues.
Discussion of proficiency, sufficiency, etc were also limited due to classification issues.
The analysis did indicate that there no overlaps or redundancies and this is logical for the airborne leg.
It would be reasonable to assume that if one reviewed the sea-based and ground-based legs (SLBM and ICBM) there would be overlaps and redundancies.
Links to CONOPs were established earlier and reinforced here with a link to the Nuclear Response CONOPs.
Table 4.1 is provided in the ICD and provides the priorities for required capabilities.

27. (5) Threat and Operational Environment.
Other Sections:
We’ll stop here…
Section 5, Threat and Operational Environment
Section 6, DOTmLPF-P
Section 7, Final Recommendations
5. Threat and Operational Environment
Description of environment already accomplished
Slide covers what is required to be in this section of an ICD
(5) Threat and Operational Environment.
Summarize the current and projected threat capabilities (lethal and non-lethal) to be countered.
- (a) Reference the current DIA-validated threat documents and DOD Component intelligence production center-approved products or data used to support the CBA.
- (b) During staffing, documents with JSDs of JROC Interest, Joint Capabilities Board (JCB) Interest, and Joint Integration will be subject to Defense Warning Office (DWO) threat validation in accordance with reference pp.1
[1] pp. CJCSI Series, “Joint Military Intelligence Requirements Certification”

28. Document Content Changes ICD
Jan 2012
Feb 2015
Cover Page
Executive Summary
Sections
CONOPS Summary
JCAs
Capability Requirements
Capability Gaps and Overlaps/Redundancies
Threat and Operational Environment
Assessment of Non-Materiel Approaches
Final Recommendations
Appendices
Architecture Data
References
Acronym List
Glossary
10 pages*
Cover Page
Validation Page
Executive Summary
Sections
Operational Context
Threat Summary
Capability Requirements and Gaps/Overlaps
Assessment of Non-Materiel Approaches
Final Recommendations
Appendices
References
Acronym List
Glossary
Classified Annex (optional)
13 Pages**
ICD Changes: Validation page added; body reduced from 7 to 5 section.
ICD page limits:
Cover Page, Validation Page and Executive Summary are all limited to one page
Body of the ICD, 5 sections, limited to 10 pages*
Appendices: Appendix A, B and C do not have a page limit.
Appendix A: DODAF architecture data is referred to by URL location prior to listing references
Appendix D, Classified Annex, if used, counts against the 10 page body limit
*This is a change from 2012 – in 2012 the 10 page limit applied to the body (7 sections) and Appendix A.
* In 2012 the 10 page limit applied to the body (7 sections) and Appendix A
** In 2015, the 10-page limit applies only to the body (5 sections)

29. Bottom Line for DoD ICDs:
Regardless of format, you just might have a “Bad” ICD if it…
Has the solution in the title …..
Clearly states “No CBA or comparable analysis was conducted…..
Refers only to Lessons Learned and Past Studies…..
Makes no mention of Joint Operations…..
Has a timeframe of last year, this year, or next year…..
Makes no reference to any DPS (ISC) or joint warfighting scenarios…..
Makes no reference to why mission accomplishment needs these capabilities.....
Lists solutions instead of approaches to solutions…..
Does not describe any significant non-materiel analysis & rationale…..
And finally --- the OV-1 does not show all 5 Services!
Slide 43 – Review (Build Slide)
You know you MAY have a bad ICD…..
If your ICD has the solution in the title …..
If you ICD clearly states “No CBA / analysis was conducted…..
If your ICD refers only to Lessons Learned and Past Studies…..
If your ICD makes no mention of Joint Operations…..
If your ICD has a timeframe of last year, this year or next year…..
If your ICD makes no reference to any DPS or joint warfighting scenario…..
If your ICD makes no reference to why capabilities are required for mission accomplishment…..
If your ICD lists the solutions required instead of approaches to solutions…..
If your ICD does not address any analysis on what non-materiel approaches were considered…..
And Finally---if the OV-1 in your ICD does not show all 5 Services…..