Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

USG 40th Annual Computing Conference, Rock Eagle 2011

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "USG 40th Annual Computing Conference, Rock Eagle 2011"— Presentation transcript:

1 USG 40th Annual Computing Conference, Rock Eagle 2011
5/12/2018 8:38 AM Incorporating the iPod Touch Device in Undergraduate Organic Chemistry: Reflections, Observations, and Discussions on Going Mobile USG 40th Annual Computing Conference, Rock Eagle 2011 Drs. Mai Yin Tsoi, David Pursell Richard Pennington, Joseph Sloop, Julia Paredes School of Science and Technology © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

2 for Innovative Use of Educational Technology
Winner of TAG’s 2011 Excalibur Award for Innovative Use of Educational Technology

3 One Grant  Two Studies Study A:
Use of iTouch in Organic Chemistry Course Study B: Development of App in an Interdisciplinary Project Organic Class = client Hiring of ITEC Class for project Modeling real-world Software Development App helps Organic students learn Interviews / Surveys Videos Flashcards Student Surveys Student Interviews Class Quizzes

4 Overview of Organic iTouch Study
5/12/2018 8:38 AM Overview of Organic iTouch Study GGC Vision and Mission Rationale/Literature Review Timeline/Description of Project Design Quantitative Results Qualitative Results © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

5 GGC Vision and Mission GGC Vision1 learning takes place continuously in and beyond the classroom innovative use of educational technology integrated educational experience that develops the whole person wellspring of educational innovation dynamic learning community faculty engagement in teaching and mentoring students innovative approaches to education SST Mission2 . . . provides an innovative, engaging, outcomes-based learning experience for students in science courses (charge from Dean Thomas G. Mundie) 1Georgia Gwinnett College Web page, 2School of Science and Technology Mission, School of Science and Technology

6 Adapt to Today’s Students To Make Chemistry and Biology Easier
Students often find Chemistry and Biology challenging Learning is more tied to technology Technology enhances learning experience IF used Take the work load to the student, keep the busy work out of learning School of Science and Technology

7 Flashcards + Cellphone???
Flashcards  memorization Repetition is key! Rare: carry flashcards everywhere Common: carry cell phones everywhere! Why not take advantage of the learning potential?!? School of Science and Technology

8 A Preference for Cellphones
Lower cost of ownership versus Laptops Can expect access outside school May lead to more “access” of material = more review/learning Small learning curve Multimedia Higher motivation, engagement, time on task Achievement Sturgeon, J., T H E Journal, 2007, 34, School of Science and Technology

9 Evolution of Organic Chemistry
iTouch Project Cell Phone Flash Cards and Airliner Videos ( ) iTouch Project (2010) Flash Card Improvement Airliner Video Reformatting Laboratory Technique Podcast Production iTouch Website Development TsoiChem App Development Mobile Enabled Learning (2011)  Facebook  Online HW Learning App Practice Flashcards

10 1st Generation of Flashcards
“I always have my phone, now I always have my flash cards.” Cell phone with PowerPoint Mobile Cards organized by text chapter Format of cards is flexible Provide students a semester worth of cards at beginning of term Encourage use during homework, problem solving sessions, and lab Phones not allowed on graded events School of Science and Technology

11 1st Generation of Flashcards
“Front” “Back” Ether example: School of Science and Technology

12 Pros/Cons to Cellphone Flashcards
“seamless learning contexts”1 “one-to-one” learning2 Tailored to class needs preliminary empirical data: positive Access Software/hardware compatability Limited by Powerpoint issues 1 Looi, C. et al. (2010) Mobilizing the Research. Education Week, 29, 6, p 34, 36. 2 Banister, S. (2010) Integrating the iPod Touch in K-12 Education: Visions and Vices. Computers in the Schools, 27, 2, p

13 iTouch Project – Fall 2010 Internal GGC Grant = $5000
Purchased 25 Apple iTouch devices Distributed to 2 class sections Voluntary Participation Demographic Survey Chemistry Attitude Survey (CAEQ)1 Surveys after each quiz Interviews of selected students 1. Dalgety, J. et al. (2003) Development of Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 7, p

14 Quantitative Results Fall 2010
No significant difference in quiz scores By gender By age By race Results skewed due to teacher effects Student reported use varied widely School of Science and Technology

15 Quantitative Results Fall 2010 – Chemistry Attitude
Chemistry Attitude (CA)– measure of self-efficacy in chemistry-related tasks CA change – difference between CA at start and at midterm of semester Technology Attitude (TA)—measure of self-efficacy in using technology School of Science and Technology

16 Quantitative Results Fall 2010 – Chemistry Attitude
No gender differences in CA change CA change at Start correlates negatively with CA change at Midterm (p < 0.004) The higher CA at start, the less change at midterm As Age increases, CA change decreases significantly (p = 0.068) School of Science and Technology

17 Quantitative Results Fall 2010 – Chemistry Attitude & Cell Usage
As Cell Usage increases, CA change increases significantly (p =0.029) In Non–iTouch sections, no correlation between Cell Usage and CA change (p = 0.624) In iTouch section, correlation between Cell Usage and CA change significant (p = 0.059) School of Science and Technology

18 Quantitative Results Fall 2010 – Chemistry Attitude & Performance
Quiz 11.2: iTouch students with higher CA did better than iTouch students who had lower CA iTouch students did better on Quiz 11.2 than non-itouch students (p = 0.001) Quiz 11.2 – directly related to reaction flashcards Higher CA midterm correlates with less usage for all chapters Higher TA midterm correlates with more usage for all chapters School of Science and Technology

19 Quantitative Results Fall 2010 –Conclusions
Those who had high CA did not increase in CA much Older students did not have as much change in CA. Resistant to changes in beliefs? Assuming Cell usage = technology comfort: High Cell Usage + iTouch = CA increase High Cell Usage + no iTouch = no CA increase Having iTouch increased the CA of students who are very comfortable with technology iTouch makes a difference in student attitude!

20 Quantitative Results: POSSIBLE ISSUES
Low number of students Limited content resources Quizzes not directly linked to iTouch resources Usage not regulated/documented Steep learning curve – students AND faculty!

21 Qualitative Results – Interviewee Demographics
Ages: 21 to 28 years old, self-selected Allen: Asian male Keith: Asian male Dora: Caucasian female Valerie: Caucasian female Phung – Asian female Brenda – Caucasian female Matt – Caucasian male School of Science and Technology

22 Summary – Cellphone Cards Users
School of Science and Technology

23 Summary – iTouch Users Study Purpose Interviewee Did/Did Not Use
General Comments Necessity Phung Did Lots of personalization Multi-Function, mobile Thorough Brenda Did, Some personalization Uses all given resources Efficient Matt Did, Lots of personalization Saves time, minimize effort USED OWN iPHONE School of Science and Technology

24 Trends in Interviews If technology supported
learning/study style  USE If learning style was not enhanced by technology  NO USE iTouch added “study purpose” to use Study purpose affected how iTouch used Prior technology experience NOT a factor School of Science and Technology

25 Brenda: Mobility + Varied Learning Modes
MT: Would you say that having this mobility, being able to access this material more, has an impact on your learning of this material and if so, why? BB: Absolutely, because it’s just readily available. I study when I can and I study a lot. I like watching (the professor) write the problem because I’m watching him do it, I’m listening to him say it, it’s all coming out onto the screen for me, step by step

26 General Indications Students enjoy iTouch Age/technology experience
plays role iTouch impacts attitude Low n, low power = some patterns not salient Learning style/purpose impacts use (or lack of) of iTouch as learning tool School of Science and Technology

27 Podcasts of Lecture & Lab Content; Flashcards

28 Tutorial Podcasts Podcasts on Cell Phone Podcasts on Computer
Watch video clips

29 Laboratory Technique Videos
Students watch videos outside of lab class Expectation: learn theory and techniques iTouch/mobile devices enabled in-lab, real time viewing non-iTouch students used laptops Watch video clips School of Science and Technology

30 Some rote memorization needed in Organic Chemistry
Reaction Flashcards Some rote memorization needed in Organic Chemistry Instructor developed flashcards Can be viewed on multiple platforms, multiple OS Watch flashcard clips

31 GGC iTouch Website

32

33 New Additions – Fall 2011 5/12/2018 8:38 AM
© 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

34 Change in Focus: Information Delivery to Information Processing
Previous: Lecture podcasts Lab technique videos Reaction flashcards

35 Change in Focus: Information Delivery to Information Processing
ADDED: Online Homework system (publisher generated) Mobile app for review (publisher generated) Facebook Page – Social Networking Drawing Flashcards – Senior Project, Natasha Craft One-Stop Website for all Multimedia Resources

36 CONNECT Online Homework

37 LearnSmart Mobile App

38 Facebook Page

39 Drawing Flashcards

40 Drawing Flashcards-Flashcards Deluxe App

41 One-Stop Shop WebPage

42 Future Directions Expand study multiple mobile platforms
iPads / tablets Technology rich classroom experience Refocus Interviews Examine ways in which resources are used

43 Thank You! Mai Yin Tsoi, Ph.D (678)


Download ppt "USG 40th Annual Computing Conference, Rock Eagle 2011"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google