1. gLite: status and perspectives
Claudio Grandi
INFN and CERN
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop
Bologna, November 2006

2. Main focus for the developers
Give support on the production infrastructure (GGUS, 2nd line support)
Fix bugs found on the production software
The above are estimated to take 50% of the resources!
Support SL(C)4 and 64bit architectures (x86-64 first)
Migration to the ETICS build system
Participate to Task Forces together with applications and site experts
Improve robustness and usability (efficiency, error reporting, ...)
Address requests for functionality improvements from users, site administrators, etc... (through the TCG)
Improve adherence to international standards and interoperability with other infrastructures
Deploy and expose to users new components on the preview test-bed
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

3. Preview test-bed
The SA3 integration and certification teams are focused on providing code for the production infrastructure
Strong control over what is accepted, but slow process for the certification of the new components and of the improvements
JRA1 requested a test-bed to expose to users those components not yet considered for certification
To get feedback from users and site managers
TCG and PEB acknowledged that this is needed, but no resources were foreseen for this activity in the EGEE-II proposal
The JRA1 partners which have also strong commitments in SA1 have been requested to provide resources (machines and manpower) for this activity without compromising their commitment in SA1
Currently internal testing
JP, ICE-CREAM, GPBOX, glexec on INFN, CESNET, HIP
Will hopefully open to users before Xmas
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

4. Summary of current activities
Security
Enabling glexec on Worker Nodes - testing on the preview
Address user and security policy requirements in VOMS, VOMSAdmin
Proxy renewal library repackaged without WMS dependencies
Shibboleth short-lived credential service and interaction with VOMS
Job Management
Working on certification of “3.1 branch” version of WMS and LB
Certification of the DGAS accounting system on INFNGrid (then SA3)
ICE-CREAM, G-PBox, Job Provenance testing on the preview
Data Management
Adding support for SRM v2.2 in DPM, GFAL, FTS, lcg_utils
Common rfio library in DPM & Castor, Xrootd plug-in’s in DPM
LFC: ssl session reuse, Oracle backend studies
FTS proxy renewal and delegation
Working with NA4 on new Encrypted Data Storage based on GFAL/LFC
Information
Adding a bootstrapping procedure in Service Discovery
Improvements in R-GMA
Development for GLUE 1.3
See dedicated talks later today
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

5. Highlights: glexec
glexec is used by the gLite Computing Elements to change the local uid as function of the user identity (DN & FQAN)
Several VOs submit ‘pilot’ jobs with a single identity for all of the VO
The pilot job gets user jobs in ‘some’ way and executes them with the placeholder’s identity
The site does not ‘see’ the original submitter
Allowing the VO pilot job to run glexec on the WN could ‘recover’ the user identity and isolate the user job from the pilot job
Issue: sites don’t like to run sudo code on the WN’s
Also unknown batch-system behaviour
A possibility is to run glexec in “null” mode:
log the uid-change request but do not do it
The original user identity is recovered but there is no isolation of user and pilot
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

6. Highlights: gLite WMS and L&B
WMProxy: web interface to WMS
decouples interaction with UI and internal procedures
logging to L&B, match-making, submission
added a load-limiter to avoid service hangs (users may go to other instances)
Renewal of VOMS proxies
Support for compound jobs (Compound, Parametric, DAGs)
One shot submission of a group of jobs
Submission time reduction (single call to WMProxy server)
Shared input sandboxes
Single Job Id to manage the group (single job ID still available)
Support for ‘scattered’ input/output sandboxes
Support for shallow resubmission
Resubmission happens in case of failure only when the job didn't start
Issues:
Needed fine tuning to work at the production scale
Difficulties in the management of DAGs
Will work to decouple Compound and Parametric jobs form DAGs
Implied a migration to Condor
Gang-matchmaking problem. Still has manageability issues
Longer term work for High Availability WMS and LB
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

7. Highlights: gLite WMS - CMS Results
~20000 jobs submitted
3 parallel UIs
33 Computing Elements
200 jobs/collection
Bulk submission
Performances
~ 2.5 h to submit all jobs
0.5 seconds/job
~ 17 hours to transfer all jobs to a CE
3 seconds/job
26000 jobs/day
Job failures
Negligible fraction of failures due to the gLite WMS
Either application errors or site problems
~7000 jobs/day
on the LCG RB
Failure reason
Job fraction (%)
Application error 28
Remote batch system
3.9
CRL expired
3.3
Worker Node problem
1.1
Gatekeeper down
0.2
By A.Sciabà - 27 September 2006
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

8. Highlights: gLite WMS - ATLAS Results
Official Monte Carlo production
Up to ~3000 jobs/day
Less than 1% of jobs failed because of the WMS in a period of 24 hours
Synthetic tests
Shallow resubmission greatly improves the success rate for site-related problems
Efficiency =98% after at most 4 submissions
From 7-jun to 9-nov
By A.Sciabà – 10 November 2006
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

9. Highlights: WMS Proposed Strategy
gLite WMS v 3.0 used in production by CMS and ATLAS
Gang match-making problem
Still management issues (# of WMProxy processes, logmonitor, interlogd)
gLite WMS v 3.1 under applications’ test
Cleaner and more manageable code
features were developed in 3.1 and back-ported to 3.0 in a Q&D way
Improved usability
better error reporting and logging
performance improvements
Non-critical bug-fixes, but also fix of the gang-matchmaking problem
A few new functionalities
e.g. status and statistics collection on WMS node
Show-stopper bug on logging sequence being fixed now
Management issues being looked at in both versions
No effort goes into LCG-RB
LCG will only support the LCG-RB (GT2, SL3) until April 2007
Effort goes in solving the management issues on the gLite WMS
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

10. Highlights: Computing Element
Three flavours available now:
LCG-CE (GT2 GRAM)
In production now but will be phased-out next year
gLite-CE (GSI-enabled Condor-C)
Already deployed but still needs thorough testing and tuning. Being done now
CREAM (WS-I based interface)
Deployed on the JRA1 preview test-bed. After a first testing phase will be certified and deployed together with the gLite-CE
Our contribution to the OGF-BES group for a standard WS-I based CE interface
CREAM and WMProxy demo at SC06!
BLAH is the interface to the local resource manager (via plug-ins)
CREAM and gLite-CE
Information pass-through: pass parameters to the LRMS to help job scheduling
WMS,
Clients
Information
System
Grid
Computing
Element
bdII
R-GMA
CEMon
Site
glexec +
LCAS/
LCMAPS
BLAH WN
LRMS
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

11. Highlights: CE - Proposed Strategy
No effort goes into LCG-CE
Will be frozen, all new effort goes into gLite-CE (functionality)
Minor adjustments for accounting, but otherwise ‘stable’
Further steps depend on the quality of the gLite-CE
LCG will only support the LCG-CE (GT2, SL3) until June 2007
May be used as a front-end to gLite 3.1 clusters
Assume that the application interface to the CE is Condor-G
Sites that support VOs that need direct GRAM access need to maintain LCG-CE and gLite-CE together while apps migrate to use Condor-G submission
GT4-pre-WS jobmanagers will be added to the gLite-CE packaging
EGEE will not provide certification for this at the moment
Sites who are interested in this should become part of the PPS
This will become only relevant towards the end of life of the LCG-CE
CREAM-CE
JRA1 should investigate to add GT4-WS GRAM interface
JRA1 should continue to work with OGF on standard interfaces
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

12. Highlights: Accounting
Collect usage records for all jobs at sites
Local and global jobId, uid, DN, VOMS FQAN, system usage (cpuTime, ...), ...
Information from log files by BLAH (gLiteCE, Cream) and LCG-CE
The information is currently collected from sites using APEL
Currently insecure storage and transfer of accounting records via R-GMA.
Working to add an authorization layer; DN encryption is in certification
DGAS already provides proper management of privacy (records signed and encrypted) but doesn’t have a proper interface for data visualization
In test on INFNGrid. After that will be certified and included in the distribution
Issues:
Need to converge on a single accounting collection tool
Process for the merge of APEL and DGAS already started
Sensors have to be provided for all batch system AND grid infrastructures
Working with OSG to factorize local and grid information collection
The Condor local batch system in the gLiteCE bypasses BLAH
Working with the Condor team to get the needed information
Producing the BLAH plug-ins for Condor
Accounting for jobs executed via a VO pilot-job
Probably only VO-based accounting will be provided by sites for these jobs
User accounting will be provided by the VO software
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

13. Highlights: Job Priorities
Applications ask for the possibility to diversify the access to fast/slow queues depending on the user role/group inside the VO
GPBOX is a tool that provides the possibility to define, store and propagate fine-grained VO policies
based on VOMS groups and roles
enforcement of policies at sites: sites may accept/reject policies
Not yet certified. Certification will start when requested by the TCG.
Current plans: test job prioritization without GPBOX:
Map VOMS groups to batch system shares (via GIDs?)
Publish info on the share in the CE GLUE 1.2 schema (VOView)
The gLite WMS has been modified to support GLUE 1.2
WMS match-making depending on submitter VOMS certificate
Settings are not dynamic (via or CE updates)
If GPBOX is needed for LHC, tests must start now!
Will be tested on the preview test-bed
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

14. gLite development plans
Complete migration to VDT 1.3.X and support for SL(C)4 and 64-bit
Complete migration to the ETICS build system
Work according to work plans available at:
In particular:
Continue work on making all services VOMS-aware
Including job priorities
Improve error reporting and logging of services
Consolidation, in particular of WMS and LB
Support for all batch systems in the production infrastructure on the CE
Use the information pass-through by BLAH to control job execution on CE
Complete support to SRM v2.2
Complete the new Encrypted Data Storage based on GFAL/LFC
Complete and test glexec on Worker Nodes
Standardization of usage records for accounting
Interoperation with other projects and adherence to standards
Collaboration with EUChinaGrid on IPv6 compliance
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

15. Update on gLite 3.1/SL4/ETICS
gLite 3.1 will support SL4
Main changes
the build will be against VDT or higher
currently this is compiled with gcc 3.2
the build will be with gcc 3.4
will use Condor
will use java 1.5
will use tomcat 5.5 as distributed by jpackage
the dependency on axis is to be clarified
will use the new ETICS build tools
Migration is in progress
ETICS is helping with the transfer
Developers followed tutorials and started using it recently
gLite 3.0/SL3 WNs running on SL4 are ready and going to PPS
Additional nodes will follow as needed (hopefully this is not needed)
No tests yet with native ports
Until they start any time estimation is very imprecise
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006

16.
Tier-1 Tier-2 Workshop, Bologna, November 2006