1. E-Learning Advisory Group Meeting 2016-04-18
David Markwell
Head of Education

2. Introductions Your name ELAG role Country Organization
ELAG Member Representative (or agree alternate)
ELAG Nominated Expert
Observer
IHTSDO Staff
Country
Organization

3. Team Update

4. Education and Product Support Team
E-Learning development/delivery is a responsibility of the Education and Product Support team
Other responsibilities
Documentation – Specifications and Implementation Guides
Product Support for implementers – Helpdesk & other activities

5. 2016 Work Plan commitments Additional key priority for the team …
Module for information analysts used to working with ICD-9/ICD-10
To assist application of knowledge and skills to SNOMED CT
Presentation on SNOMED CT in communication standards
Practical implementation example presentations
Presentations based on priority documentation developments
Clinical Decision Support
Refset management
Training new team members to deliver course Webinars
Maintenance activities
Reviewing and Updates to existing presentations
Extending the question bank for course assessments
Updating and replacing practical course assignments
Additional key priority for the team …
Major document migration and restructuring

6. National Data on E-Learning for Members

7. Applicants to each course from your country
Data the E-Learning Team Currently Provides to Members ELAG Representatives on Request
Applicants to each course from your country
For prioritization
As a record of who has been accepted for each course intake
Overall completion rates for course for applicants from your country
Where this is possible without identifying individuals
This can be an issue where only one or two people are taking a course
For this information the ELAG representative should request the data by ing

8. Data we do not provide to Members
We do not provide data on individual student progress or completion
All those successfully completing a course have a certificate which can be automatically validated on the E-Learning Server
You could use the entry data to ask people if they have successfully completed and if so invite them to submit their certificates

9. Future Plans for Data Provision / Publication
We could offer the following additional options
A Member contact page for those taking or completing the course
This would be a message on the E-Learning server linking to a page containing details of a Member contact for their country
An invitation to those completing an advanced* course to request inclusion on a public listed web page of course completers
With or without details such as address and grades
* This does not include the Foundation course

10. National Data on E-Learning for Members

11. E-Learning History History E-Learning Server Accounts
Feb 2015: Foundation course first intake started
Apr 2015: First course completions
Jul 2015: Implementation Course first intake
Jan 2016: Content Development Theory Course first intake
Feb 2016: Implementation Course first completions
E-Learning Server Accounts
2629 Users
1638 Accessed the server in the last six months
562 Access the server in the last month
Course completions so far …
959: Foundation completions
32: Implementation completions
See ELAG Space for E-Learning Status details …

12. Course Intakes, Capacity, Duration and Wait Time
Foundation
Monthly intakes
Course duration up to 4 months (plus extension)
No fixed limit on numbers
Wait time from application to start date 2 to 6 weeks
Implementation
Intakes every four months
Course duration 6 months (plus optional deferral)
Limit of 100 per intake
Wait time from application to start date 6 weeks to 8 months
Content Development Theory
Course duration 3 months (plus optional deferral)
Limit of 40 per intake will rise to 80 from September intake

13. Foundation Course Overall Evaluation (476 responses)

14. Foundation Course Met My Educational Needs (476 resp)
91% of respondents said they would recommend the course to others
67% said they planned to apply for other SNOMED CT E-Learning Courses

15. Implementation Course Overall Evaluation (23 responses)

16. Implementation Course Met My Educational Needs (23 resp)
100% of respondents said they would recommend the course to others

17. Course Feedback and Evaluation
See ELAG space for more details …

18. K