1. Makiko ORITA Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University
Communication radiation risk
in Kawauchi Village,
Fukushima Prefecture
Makiko ORITA
Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University

2. Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident
The natural disaster led to severe damage to the Plant, which caused subsequent release of large amounts of radionuclides into the air.

3. Kawauchi Village
:Areas in which evacuation orders are ready to be lifted
: Areas in which the residents are not permitted to live
: Areas where it is expected that the residents have difficulties in returning for a long time
Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
FNPP

4. Process for the reconstruction of the village
Declaration of returning hometown
Decontamination
Restarting of elementary and junior high schools
Opening of shopping store

5. Rate of residents returning to Kawauchi Village (January 2015)
Not returned
Returned
116
168
256
232
268
455
482
361
372 84
2,739 94
128
174
137
178
196
152 96
133 51
1,158
Rate of return 22 40 82 95 90
259
330
265
239 33
1,581
Age group
(Kawauchi village office)

6. Establishment of Nagasaki University/ Kawauchi Village Reconstruction Promotion Base in Kawauchi Village (April 2013)
Mission
Evaluation of effectiveness of decontamination through the measurement of radionuclides in soils.
Evaluation of risks of internal exposure through the measurement of foods and waters.
Health consultation with inhabitants according to the results of above mentioned measurements.
Health promotion of inhabitants.

7. Individual consultation on radiation exposure and health effects

8. “Mushroom map” in Kawauchi village based on the measurement of radiocesium concentrations in dried mushrooms
2014/8/20
Hawk Wing
Honey Mushroom
Brick Cap
Others
キノコ類を含めた食品について、厚生労働省が震災の起こった2011年3月に定めた暫定基準値500Bq/ｋｇから、2012年4月には新基準値として100Bq/kgが設定されているので、セシウム１３４とセシウム１３７の合算で100Bq/ｋｇ未満と不検出を青で100Bq/kg以上～500Bq/kg未満を緑で500～1000を黄色で1000～10000を赤で、10000以上を紫で示しています。この地図の色分けでみると各エリアに500Bq/kg以上のキノコがみられます。154サンプル中128サンプル（８３パーセント）から、500Bq/kｇ以上の放射性セシウムが検出されました。
（青１８（n.d 17)　緑８　黄６　　　赤86サンプル　　紫36サンプル）
<100 (Bq/kg)
>10000

9. External radiation exposure dose in Fukushima Prefecture (454,940 residents)
(Fukushima Health Survey 2015)
Number
External exposure doses (mSv)

10. Number of participants according to internal exposure dose of the Fukushima residents
Dose Number of residents <1 mSv 262, mSv mSv 10 3 mSv- 2 Total 262,653
(Fukushima Health Survey 2015)

11. Recognition on the health effects of radiation exposure in Fukushima Prefecture (2012)
(Fukushima Health Survey Mental Health and Lifestyle Survey.)
Very low possibility
Very high possibility 1
Do you think that acute radiation syndrome such as hair loss and nasal bleeding occur due to radiation exposure in Fukushima?
19,114
(58.5%)
7,240
(22.2%)
3,259
(10.0%)
3,045
(9.3%) 2
Do you think that late health effects such as malignancies will occur due to radiation exposure in Fukushima?
10,225
(31.4%)
9,531
(29.2%)
6,488
(19.9%)
6,352
(19.5%) 3
Do you think that genetic effects in offspring will occur due to radiation exposure in Fukushima?
7,857
(24.3%)
8,982
(27.7%)
7,331
(22.6%)
8,215
(25.4%)
(persons, %)

12. Risk perception on the radiation health effects in Kawauchi village (May 2014, n=285)
Do you think that about the acute radiation syndrome might occur due to the radiation exposure following the accident?
Do you have anxiety about the health effects of radiation in children?
Do you have anxiety about the health effects of radiation in offspring? 1. 2. 3.
Yes No No No
Yes
Yes
Probably yes
Probably No
Probably No
Probably yes
Probably yes
Probably No

13. Risk perception on the radiation health effects in Kawauchi village (May 2014, n=285)
Do you have anxiety about the health effects of radiation for general population by living the environment ambient dose rate is 0.23µSv/hour for one year (equivalent with 1mSv/year)?
Do you have anxiety about the health effects of radiation for general population by eating 100Bq/kg of mushrooms for one year (current regulation value of radiocesium for foods? 1. No 2.
Yes No
Yes
Probably yes
Probably No
Probably No
Probably yes

14. Discussion
Our results showed that the bipolarization of risk perception of health effects due to radiation exposure in Fukushima. Concepts of radiation protection were not fully understood by many Fukushima residents.
Specialists must rise to the challenge of overcoming the gap between the documented risk perception of residents and presenting scientific evidence.

15. Conclusion
Bipolarization of the risk perception of the health effects of radiation in residents might have a major impact on long-term social well-being after the accident at FNPP.
It is needed for specialists to pursue a risk communication strategy that accepts the serious misunderstandings among many residents.