Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Service Costs and their recovery in Urban water and sanitation services: A study of select urban areas in AP Ramakrishna Nallathiga Associate Professor.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Service Costs and their recovery in Urban water and sanitation services: A study of select urban areas in AP Ramakrishna Nallathiga Associate Professor."— Presentation transcript:

1 Service Costs and their recovery in Urban water and sanitation services: A study of select urban areas in AP Ramakrishna Nallathiga Associate Professor National Institute of Construction Management and Research Pune – (INDIA) Presented at the International Conference on “Decentralised Water & Wastewater Management in Asia” held by International Water Association (IWA) at Nagpur on Nov 20-22, 2012

2 Structure Introduction Urban services The Study
Status of Urban Water Supply Status of Urban Sanitation Status of Solid Waste Management Reforms and actions

3 Introduction Provision of urban infrastructure services, the costs associated and their recovery is long debated The organisation of services in urban local bodies is itself complex to bring some clarity Inter-governmental set-up of urban local bodies renders with further complexity Few studies in major cities/ towns in India point to the service delivery, costs and sustainability Ruet et al (2002) Bagchi (2003) Mukherjee (2009)

4 Urban services The Municipal Acts of State/Local governments specify the functional domain, which includes the core services of water supply, sanitation, roads, streetlights and solid waste management There are five categories of urban local governments in AP: Municipal corporations Selection and Special grade municipalities First, second and third grade municipalities Nagar panchayats Urban local bodies are caught in the dilemma over expanding services to ever increasing population and pricing them to commensurate the costs of service

5 Study objectives The broad objective of study was to work out an assessment/ reform framework for user charge levy to recover O&M costs incurred in the provision of urban water and sanitation services rendered by the ULBs in Andhra Pradesh. The specific objectives include: To study the existing scenario of user charge collection in the ULBs; To enable the ULBs in the fixation of user charges appropriately; To avoid financial un-sustainability of the service delivery To overcome deficiencies in the delivery of services. The principles, process and guidelines of user charge levy towards this objective are discussed separately in another paper – Nallathiga (2009) and do not form the discussion of current paper.

6 Study sample Region City/ Town Urban Local Body Water supply source
Sanitation system Coastal Andhra Tuni Municipality Ground water Open drains Rajamundry Municipal Corporation River water - Tenali Eluru Canal water Underground Sewerage Rayalaseema Kurnool Pulivendula Surface & Ground water Guntakal Telangana Mahabub Nagar Mancherial Ramagundam

7 Sample characteristics
Name of Town ULB Category Area (sq km) Population (No.) City Class Tuni II Grade Municipality 9.85 50,368 II Rajamundry Municipal Corporation 44.50 413,616 I Tenali Spl Grade Municipality 15.12 153,756 Eluru 12.02 215,804 Kurnool 15.01 342,973 Pulivendula III Grade Municipality 50,503 Guntakal I Grade Municipality 51.90 117,103 Mahabub Nagar 14.00 139,662 Mancherial 41.44 49,221 III Ramagundam 93.87 237,686

8 Status of service, user charges and cost recovery
WATER SUPPLY

9 Water supply source and service
City Means of Water tapping Means of Water distribution Tuni Tube wells Individual tap and tankers Rajamundry Gravity flow Individual tap Tenali NA Eluru Kurnool Gravity flow and lift Pulivendula Gravity flow and Tube wells Guntakal Mahabub Nagar Lift Mancherial Ramagundam Diversion and Lift

10 Water supply source and service
City/Town Water storage Water distribution Elevated Reservoirs Underground reservoirs Over ground reservoirs Tuni 4 - 2 Individual tap & tankers Rajamundry NA Individual tap Tenali Eluru 18 Kurnool 14 1 Pulivendula Guntakal 10 Mahabub Nagar Mancherial Ramagundam

11 Water supply status

12 Water supply cost structure
Share of Various O&M Cost Heads (as % to Total) TOTAL ULB Salaries Power & Fuel Consumables Maintenance Equipment Hire Guntakal M 59 8 3 10 20 100 Kurnool MC 70 - 16 14 Mancherial M 41 11 19 18 Ramagundam M 23 2 12 21 Eluru MC 30 45 6 15 Mahabub Nagar M 4 76 1 Pulivendula M 68 13 Tuni M 57 Rajahmundry MC 54 7

13 Water supply user charge
City/ Town Monthly Charge per connection (Rs) Guntakal NA Kurnool 60 Mancherial 75 Ramagundam 100 Eluru 90 Mahabubnagar Pulivendula 15 Tuni 63 Tenali Rajahmundry Sample Average 74

14 Status of service, user charges and cost recovery
SANITATION

15 Sanitation cost structure
ULB Share of O&M Cost Heads (In Percentage) TOTAL COST (%) Salaries Tools and Equipment Consumables Maintenance Equipment/Vehicle Hire Guntakal M 39.39 26.38 34.23 - 100 Kurnool MC 99.33 0.67 Mancherial M 93.71 6.29 Ramagundam M 67.90 32.10 Eluru MC 33.71 50.94 0.37 7.49 Mahabubnagar M 18.18 81.82 Pulivendula M 50.00 Tuni M 98.49 0.75 Tenali M 95.60 0.00 4.40

16 Solid wastes cost structure
O&M Cost Heads (In Per centage) ULB Salaries Fuel Maintenance Equipment Hire Spare Parts & Repair Total Costs Guntakal 94.33 3.78 0.90 0.28 0.71 100.00 Kurnool 43.05 9.05 0.47 47.12 0.31 Mancherial 89.48 4.48 - 4.29 1.75 Ramagundam 82.17 15.71 1.47 Eluru 85.11 13.48 1.42 Mahabubnagar 89.44 1.25 8.97 0.00 0.35 Pulivendula 95.31 4.69 Tuni 66.83 4.58 26.19 2.39 Tenali 82.64 17.36

17 Status of service, user charges and cost recovery
REFORMS & SUGGESTIONS

18 Scope for service improvement
Service Category Service Parameter Current Level Potential for Improvement Water supply Water quantity Water quality Access/Service coverage Water consumption measurement Adequate Service deficits in city outskirts No metering of water supply low Improved network Metering of water supply Sanitation Sewage conveyance Sewage treatment Sewage disposal Open drains No treatment Open disposal Covered drains Primary treatment Recycle/ reuse Solid waste management Waste collection Waste separation Waste transport Waste treatment Waste disposal Door to door collection Separation at disposal site Organised transport No waste treatment Open dumping Decentralisation Separation at source little Bio-composting Sanitary practices

19 Feasibility of cost recovery
Service High Medium Low None Water and Sanitation Water Supply √ Sewerage √ Sanitation √ Solid Waste Waste collection √ Waste transport √ Waste treatment √

20


Download ppt "Service Costs and their recovery in Urban water and sanitation services: A study of select urban areas in AP Ramakrishna Nallathiga Associate Professor."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google