Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJosephine Nichols Modified over 6 years ago
1
M. Ismail, D. Brawley, S. Baguley BASHH Annual Conference 2016
Community Viral Load: A population-based biomarker of HIV disease burden in Scotland M. Ismail, D. Brawley, S. Baguley BASHH Annual Conference 2016
2
Introduction Community viral load (CVL) is an aggregate biological measure of HIV viral load (VL) in a population Reduction in CVL has been correlated to a decrease in HIV incidence (Das et al, 2010) CVL is a potential tool that can be used to measure HIV disease burden and inform targeted HIV prevention services to local areas (Castel et al, 2011)
3
Health Protection Scotland
HIV Surveillance System Monitors all HIV diagnoses in Scotland Collates HIV monitoring data including viral load and CD4 count based on locally provided data Does not currently collate CVL data
4
Methods Retrospective cross-sectional study based on HPS Surveillance Data in 2014 Divided into 3 regions: North Central South-East (CSE) Central South-West (CSW)
5
Methods Baseline demographics CVL within each region calculated as:
Age Gender Transmission risk Year of diagnosis CVL within each region calculated as: Mean CVL = Total CVL = HIV diagnoses for each region in 2014
6
Baseline Demographics
Aspect Region (%) Total (N=4126) CSE (n=1639) CSW (n=1749) North (n=738) Sex F 446 (27.2) 496 (28.4) 209 (28.3) 1151 (27.9) M 1193 (72.8) 1253 (71.6) 529 (71.7) 2975 (72.1) Age Group 0 – 24 40 (2.4) 30 (1.7) 15 (2.0) 85 (2.1) 25 – 34 208 (12.7) 303 (17.3) 124 (16.8) 635 (15.4) 35 – 44 439 (26.8) 597 (34.1) 178 (24.1) 1214 (29.4) 45+ 952 (58.1) 819 (46.8) 421 (57.0) 2192 (53.1) Transmission Risk Heterosexual 602 (36.7) 742 (42.4) 372 (50.4) 1716 (41.6) IDU 186 (11.3) 134 (7.7) 62 (8.4) 382 (9.3) MSM 796 (48.6) 808 (46.2) 262 (35.5) 1866 (45.2) Other 37 (2.3) 48 (2.7) 23 (3.1) 108 (2.6) Unknown 18 (1.1) 17 (1.0) 19 (2.6) 54 (1.3) HIV Diagnosis (Year) 1982 – 1991 192 (11.7) 87 (5.0) 45 (6.1) 324 (7.9) 1992 – 2001 362 (22.1) 274 (15.7) 153 (20.7) 789 (19.1) 2002 – 2011 824 (50.3) 1009 (57.7) 366 (49.6) 2199 (53.3) 2011 – 2014 261 (15.9) 379 (21.7) 174 (23.6) 814 (19.7) No statistically significant difference between regions
7
CVL Data (1)
8
CVL Data (2) Central South-West region (n=1749): Highest mean CVL: 20,469 copies/ml, 95% CI [8146 – 32,933] Lowest % with undetectable VL: 77.9% Central South-East region (n=1639): Lowest mean CVL: 16,433 copies/ml, 95% CI [11,978 – 20,888] Highest % with undetectable VL: 79.4% North region (n=738) Mean CVL: 17,380 copies/ml, 95% CI [6466=24,387] % undetectable VL: 78.5% Statistically significant difference in mean rank VL and the mean rank logVL between the three regions (both p<0.001)
9
Number of new HIV diagnoses
Time Number of new HIV diagnoses CSE CSW North Jan – Mar 2014 14 38 8 Apr – Jun 2014 30 43 27 Jul – Sep 2014 29 59 12 Oct – Dec 2014 31 23 20 Total 104 163 67 Cases/100,000 population 8.55 5.83 4.84
10
CVL v. Incident HIV diagnoses
11
Central South East
12
Central South West
13
North
14
Scotland
15
CVL v. Quarterly HIV Incidence
An increase in mean VL was accompanied by a increase in quarterly incidence of new HIV diagnoses in Scotland however this was not statistically significant (Spearman’s rho = 0.025, p=0.11) Regional results also not statistically significant Central South West (Spearman’s rho = 0.062, p=0.01) Central South East (Spearman’s rho = 0.032, p=0.196) North (Spearman’s rho = –0.047, p=0.202)
16
Key messages First known study to collate CVL data in Scotland
Significant difference in CVL between regions in Scotland Non significant correlation between CVL and quarterly HIV diagnoses Current data set limited - further studies to assess longer time frame with more detailed locality data and avidity results Impact of study Further studies
17
Thank you Glenn Codere at HPS
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.