Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

(Over)Reacting to Trends in Violent Crime

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "(Over)Reacting to Trends in Violent Crime"— Presentation transcript:

1 (Over)Reacting to Trends in Violent Crime
Jeffrey A. Butts, Ph.D. August 6, :00 pm Auditorium Washington Renaissance Hotel Juvenile Crime: Trends and Perceptions Presented to the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative Conference, Annie E. Casey Foundation

2 Crime Trends are Easily Distorted by Policymakers for Temporary Political Gain
Especially violent crime and drug crime Especially juvenile crime Some distortions may even be well-intended (e.g., to focus lawmakers on domestic issues)

3 National Trends in Juvenile Arrests

4

5 This increase, while not large in relative terms, captured the attention of policymakers and the news media in 2006 and 2007. It was almost entirely due to a change in robbery arrest rates.

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17 Note the similarity in robbery arrest rates and weapon arrest rates.

18 Common Debating Trick Dismiss national trends as meaningless Argue that focus should be on local data Cherry-pick data that best suits your argument

19 Violent Crime in 100 U.S. Cities
Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 2008 Method: Simple Visual Inspection of Long-Term Trends

20 100 Largest Cities Participating in UCR from 1985-2007
4 Types of Crime Trends n % (pop.) Generally Decreasing % Relatively Stable/Unclear % Increasing Somewhat % Generally Increasing % %

21 50 Cities 67% of the population Generally Decreasing Including:
Albuquerque Houston New York Anaheim Jacksonville Newark Baltimore Long Beach Phoenix Boston Los Angeles Raleigh Chicago Miami San Diego Dallas Nashville Seattle

22 Stable or Unclear Trends
24 Cities 14% of the population

23 Increasing Somewhat 17 Cities 13% of the population

24 Generally Increasing In the remaining 9 cities (6% of the population)
Violent crime grew either: (1) in a relatively sustained way, or (2) so sharply that the gains from the s were being nearly erased

25 Generally Increasing Anchorage, AK Lexington, KY
Birmingham, AL Modesto, CA Fremont, CA Norfolk, VA Greensboro, NC Pittsburgh, PA Las Vegas, NV In all but one of these cities (Anchorage), violent crime fell between 2007 and 2008

26 26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44 Simply Put: Crime rates just vary – usually in unexplainable and unpredictable ways We are most likely to distort the meaning of trends when we try to interpret short-term changes (2 or 3 years) Just look at 4 of the cities we were all very worried about in 2005 and 2006…

45 Cities With Previously Disturbing Trends

46 Cities With Previously Disturbing Trends

47 Cities With Previously Disturbing Trends

48 Cities With Previously Disturbing Trends

49 Cities With Previously Disturbing Trends

50 The only thing we know about the future is that it will be different.
- Peter Drucker 


Download ppt "(Over)Reacting to Trends in Violent Crime"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google