Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Breaching the Gap Between Laissez-fair Attitudes and Planning

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Breaching the Gap Between Laissez-fair Attitudes and Planning"— Presentation transcript:

1 Breaching the Gap Between Laissez-fair Attitudes and Planning
Kristín Vala Ragnarsdóttir Institute of Earth Sciences, Highland National Park: Opportunities to Link Tourism and Conservation Linking Tourism & Conservation Hraueyjar Guest House, Iceland

2 Earth’s Life Support System Quantifiable Nature Capital
Society Economy Quantifiable Nature Capital ASAP, Costanza et al. 2014

3 “Þetta reddast” A very typical Icelandic attitude
It means – well we have not planned it but it will be ok, we will make it happen - and generally it does… Compare and contrast with Swiss planning

4 Annual number of tourists
GDP 2016 2008 2000 1975

5 USA National Parks Entrance fee - $7.0 per person per day
Reservations usually required Federal Recreation Passes Annual pass $80 (two people can sign the pass – up to 3 people 16 and older can travel) Regional passes $60 (up to 3 persons with pass holder) Free for 15 years and under Fees used for managing park, provide visitor facilities and services… Special 7 day charge for vehicles - $30 for cars

6 Bhutan Everything has to be booked before coming You need a visa ($40)
Hotels etc You need a visa ($40) You can only travel around with a licensed Bhutanese tour guide You pay a tourist tax of $65 (sustainable tourism royalty) Goes toward education, healthcare, poverty alleviation, building infrastructure

7 Switzerland Tax is used for tourist infrastructure
Transportation, information services, cultural performances) Referred to as visitors´ taxes Paid per person per night Varies from town to town, season to season and according to type of accommodation Typically $ per person per night (sometime with citizen´s pass) Children 6-16 half price Swiss people pay the same tax

8 Other countries we can learn from
Norway (Svalbard) Finland – one governing agency

9 Compare and contrast with Þingvellir National Park
Anyone can enter whenever they wish No local guide required No National Park fee Fee for parking and toilets (new) I have seen 20 buses and a few hundred cars there at the same time That makes more than 1000 people “Þetta reddast” is not working any more... “Þetta reddast” will not work for a Highland National Park

10 7 operators have the license to take people
diving/snorcling at Þingvellir…

11 THE SDGs 2015-2030 also known as GDP
The SDGs have framed a much broader interpretation of “progress” than traditional GDP

12 Subjective Well-Being New Development Paradigm
Planetary Boundaries Overall Goal: Sustainable, Prosperous, and Equitable Well-Being for humans and the rest of nature Basic Human Needs (subsistence, reproduction, security, affection, participation, leisure, creativity, identity, freedom, etc.) Subjective Well-Being (moderated by happiness skills) New Development Paradigm Ecological sustainability, fair distribution, regenerative economy, living democracy Capital Assets Natural, Built, Human and Social (including financial) ASAP - Costanza et al. 2014

13 Society Of Wellbeing Nature regeneration/ Environmental protection
Ecosystem and human wellbeing Business environmental responsibility Society Of Wellbeing Major Activity: Achievement of SDGs Sustainable tourism Nature education Regenerative economy Inequality reporting Healthy citizen Internationally active Living democracy Integrative governance Stakeholder engagement Sustainable transport Maps of electoral programs Nature has human rights (Bolivia, Equador, New Zealand) Sustainability in constitution (Namibia, Costa Rica) AtKisson’s Compass

14 Tourism and nature conservation
Linking the tourist industry and nature conservation Key to a sustainable future We need to learn from other nations Need to tax accommodation and entry into national parks Use revenue to build infrastructure + fund rangers + information centres Need to operate within nature and social sustainability limits Indicators need to be developed and agreed There must be careful planning for Tourism in general and the Highland National Park … and one governing agency

15 Now lets discuss… Thank you!

16 Carrying capacity being exceeded
Nature Paths, lack of paths, lack of time/location planning… Tourist guides are ranking Iceland much lower in 2017 than a few years ago Society Tourists have taken over… AirBnB There are thousands of “imported” people working in the tourist industry There are sad stories about them being treated badly Has an effect on the rental housing market Thousands of people hired in from abroad Economy Road upkeep in shambles Reason for economic growth in Iceland but revenue not used for infrastructure (with small exceptions…)

17 VAT on accommodation Good idea (from my perspective)
How is this charge used? Aim to increase in 2018 It should be used to build local infrastructure! Charges for entering National Parks needed Some Icelanders don´t like it but that should not prevent us from doing it So my question is - Is there a plan? Very badly needed: Control of tourist numbers in popular areas

18 Way forward Use accommodation tax and National Park entrance fee to build up infrastructure and increase number of highland and natural park rangers Build visitors centres with adequate services and information Limit numbers of tourists in time and geographic areas Carefully monitor societal wellbeing and tolerance of tourist industry The Krona is far too strong so Iceland is now very expensive – is that a good thing for limiting numbers? Monitoring must be on tourist industry to follow regulations (tax etc) We need to pay attention to our reputation abroad

19 Contribution to GDP GDP 2016 Tourism in Iceland 6% Industry 10%
With indirect effect 10% Industry 10% Fisheries 11% GDP prediction 6% IMF


Download ppt "Breaching the Gap Between Laissez-fair Attitudes and Planning"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google