Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySandra McDonald Modified over 6 years ago
1
NEUTRINO OSCILLATION MEASUREMENTS WITH REACTORS
R. D. McKeown Caltech NDM09 Madison, Wisconsin Sept. 4, 2009
2
Outline Reactor antineutrinos – generation, detection
KamLAND experiment and results Reactor q13 experiments Conclusions
3
Neutrino Studies with Nuclear Reactors
ne from n-rich fission products detection via inverse beta decay (ne+pge++n) Measure flux and energy spectrum
4
Discovery of the Neutrino – 1956
F. Reines, Nobel Lecture, 1995 "All you have to do is imagine something that does practically nothing. You can use your son-in-law as a prototype."
5
Detection Signal n + p g n + e+ g p + e 511keV 2.2 MeV d n
Coincidence signal: Prompt: e+ annihilation g En=Eprompt+En+0.8 MeV Delayed: n+p 180 ms capture time, 2.2 MeV n+Gd 30 ms capture time, 8 MeV
6
The Reactor Neutrino Flux and Spectrum
235U, 239Pu, 241Pu from b measurements 238U calculated Time dependence due to fuel cycle ~ 200 MeV per fission ~ 6 e per fission ~ 2 x 1020 e/GWth-sec Reactor Isotopes
8
Precise Measurements Flux and Energy Spectrum g ~1-2 %
Reactors are calibrated sources of n ’s !!
9
The Motivation for KamLAND
Persistent observations of deficit of solar neutrinos 1998 – observation of oscillations of atmospheric neutrinos by Super-K Unique opportunity to perform longer baseline reactor experiment in Japan
10
Enter Calibrated source(s) Large detector (1 kton)
Long Baseline (180 km) Calibrated source(s) Large detector (1 kton) Deep underground (2700 mwe)
11
KamLAND uses the entire Japanese nuclear power industry as a
Kashiwazaki KamLAND uses the entire Japanese nuclear power industry as a longbaseline source Takahama Ohi Note: The neutrinos are free of charge!
12
Energy Spectrum
13
KamLAND Result (2008) Best combined fit values:
arXiv: v2 [hep-ex] Best combined fit values: Dm2 = x 10-5 eV2 tan2q =
14
Maki – Nakagawa – Sakata Matrix
Gateway to CP Violation! CP violation
15
CHOOZ/Palo Verde limits for 13
Allowed region At m231 = 2.5 103 eV2, sin22 < 0.15
16
Hints from Global Fits → sin22q13 ~ 0.06-0.08? Fogli, et al.,
arXiv:0905:3549 Also: A. B. Balantekin and D. Yilmaz, J. Phys. G 35, (2008) → sin22q13 ~ ?
17
Theoretical Predictions for q13
18
ne Survival Probability
Dominant 12 Oscillation near far Subdominant 13 Oscillation “Clean” measurements of q, Dm2 No CP violation Negligible matter effects
19
Reactor θ13 Neutrino Experiments
Chooz, France RENO, Korea Daya Bay, China Angra, Brazil Under construction. Proposed and R&D.
20
1051 m 380 m Two identical detectors:10 tons each.
Phase 1 (2010): Far Detector in existing lab. Phase 2 ( ): running with Near detector in new lab. 1051 m 380 m Status(July09): PMT’s installed at far site Acrylic vessels constructed Veto under construction
21
Near Detector Tunnel Length 100 m 70 m Hill Tunnel Length 300 m 1.4 km
Far Detector Near Detector Tunnel Length 300 m Tunnel Length 100 m 1.4 km 200 m Mt. 70 m Hill
22
Comparison Table Experiment Thermal Power (GW) Distances Near/Far (m)
Depth (mwe) Target Mass (tons) Start Date Sensitivity @2.5x10-3 eV2 90% CL, 3 years Double-CHOOZ (France) 8.6 410/1050 115/300 8.8/8.8 4/2010, 2011 0.032 RENO (So. Korea) 17.3 290/1380 120/450 15/15 2010? 0.02 Daya Bay (China) 17.4 363(481) / 1985(1613) 260/910 40(2) / 80 2011 0.008
23
Daya Bay Nuclear Power Plant
4 reactor cores, GW 2 more cores in 2011, 5.8 GW Mountains provide overburden to shield cosmic-ray backgrounds Baseline ~2km Multiple detectors → measure ratio
24
Experiment Layout Multiple detectors 20T per site cross-check
detector efficiency Two near sites sample flux from reactor groups 20T Total Tunnel length ~ 3000 m
25
Antineutrino Detector
SS Tank Acrylic Vessels 20 T Gd-doped liquid scintillator Calibration units Gamma catcher Buffer oil 192 8” PMT’s 3 zone design Uniform response No position cut 12%/√ E resolution
26
Muon Veto System RPC’s Water Cerenkov (2 layers)
Redundant veto system → 99.5% efficient muon rejection
27
Site Preparation Assembly Building Tunnel lining
Daya Bay Near Hall construction (100m underground) Assembly Building Tunnel lining Portal of Tunnel
28
Civil Construction Status
Far Hall Ling Ao Hall Tunnel Entrance Daya Bay Near Hall Construction Tunnel
29
Hardware Progress Transporter SSV Prototype
4m Acrylic Vessel Prototype Transporter Calibration Units
30
Detector Assembly Delivery of 4m AV SS Tank delivery Clean Room
31
Transporting the Prototype Detector
32
Sensitivity to Sin22q13 Experiment construction: 2008-2011
Start acquiring data: 2011 3 years running
33
Project Schedule October 2007: Ground breaking
August 2008: CD3 review (DOE start of construction) March 2009: Surface Assembly Building occupancy Summer 2009: Daya Bay Near Hall occupancy Fall 2009: First AD complete Summer 2010: Daya Bay Near Hall ready for data Summer 2011: Far Hall ready for data (3 years of data taking to reach goal sensitivity)
34
Sensitivity of q13 Experiments
Huber et al.,
35
Conclusions Reactor neutrino experiments have entered “precision era”
KamLAND provided the first “laboratory” evidence for neutrino oscillations, with a high precision measurement of Dm122 RENO, Double-CHOOZ, Daya Bay will study q13 during , with Daya Bay reaching sin22q13<0.01 If reactor experiments establish θ13 to be sufficiently large, Nova may then contribute unique sensitivity to the mass hierarchy in the next decade. In addition, the value of θ13 will provide necessary guidance to future accelerator-based long baseline experiments.
36
Stay Tuned !!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.