Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJessica Reed Modified over 6 years ago
1
Mooring Sensor Network for Ocean Observatories: Continuous, Adaptive Profiling – Development Status Report – Bruce M. Howe, Timothy McGinnis, Jason Gobat Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington Roger Lukas, Univ Hawaii Emmanuel Boss, Univ Maine Ocean Sciences Honolulu 24 February 2006
3
Introduction A major effort and cost in the lifetime of an ocean observatory system will be in the sensor networks Here – the sensor network infrastructure part Terminology: Backbone infrastructure provides primary junction boxes/nodes Sensor networks = (sensors/instruments + sensor network infrastructure) A system integration problem – many components
4
Need for profiling moorings in ORION and ocean observatories
Reduce temporal and spatial aliasing in vertical sampling of the ocean, e.g., at tide and internal wave frequencies and space scales Deliberately intensive sampling of fine vertical structure — Meddies/coherent eddies, biological thin layers, overflows, etc. Sampling of episodic or otherwise non-stationary flow Less expensive than many fixed instruments
5
Example: Fully loaded mooring (RFA Daly et al. 2005)
Two platforms for remote sensing and point instruments Two profilers Tomography source and receiver Bottom instrument suite Called for in many ORION RFA proposals (e.g., Barth, Daly, Dever, Duda, Send, Worcester, …)
6
ALOHA-MARS Observatory Mooring
Features Enables adaptive sampling Distributes power and communications capability throughout the water column ROV servicing Major Components Subsurface float at ~165 m depth with sensor suite and junction box Mooring profiler with sensor suite that can “dock” for battery charging, continuous two-way communications Electro-optical-mechanical mooring cable Seafloor sensor suite and junction box Deployments June 2006 on Seahurst Observatory in Puget Sound, 30 m depth on MARS in Monterey Bay, 900 m depth
7
FLOAT ASSEMBLY Instrument Package ADCP Secondary node Center Ti Post
8
INSTRUMENT PACKAGE BB2F SIIM CTDO2
9
SWIVEL Float Ti Post Oil Reservoir All Electrical “D” Plate
EO Converter Mooring Cable Termination Electrical and Optical Primary Winding
10
MMP Secondary Winding Concentrated on Inductive power coupler
S&K Engineering ~3 mm gap Efficiency ~65% 200 W transfer 50 kHz MMP electronics includes 16 V battery charging
11
Seafloor Secondary Node
Stainless steel electronics case (on-hand, full ocean depth) PC-104 controller 400-48V dc (Vicor) MOSFET and deadface switches, software controlled Ground fault detection a la MARS 8-port 100baseT Ethernet switch Two guest ports Removable ballast ROV-mateable connectors Electronics ROV “fork” slots Fiberglass grating
12
Deck Frame Requires DP ship
Mooring winch Trawl winch Load transfers Anchor first Rail system – moves float and mooring cable in and out Lays on fantail Bolts to 2-ft pattern Float and Ti post locked during prep
14
Acceleration, attitude
Sensors Components BB2F Connectors CTDO2 ADCP 150 kHz Video-cam RS-232-Ethernet ACM
15
Schedule First test MARS Location Seahurst, Puget Sound June 2006
Deploy summer 2007 MARS Node HydroGeo Borehole Seismo Borehole MOBB Proposed Aloha Site UTM: E, N 36 41’ ”N ’ ”W
16
Other possible users Jack Barth – upper ocean profiler
Jeff Nystuen – ocean ambient sound Peter Worcester – vertical line array Ken Smith – bottom rover Tom Sanford, Doug Luther – HPIES John Horne – fisheries sonar Lee Freitag – acoustic modem/nav/comms
17
AMM animation - docking
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.