1. Session 3 The monitoring framework
Background, purpose, scope, indicators
UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team

2. Background: Monitoring effective development co-operation commitments
Paris Surveys ( )
3 surveys - Monitored progress against commitments made in the Paris Declaration, and subsequent Accra Agenda for Action (2010 targets)
Monitoring coordinated by the OECD (WP-EFF)
GPEDC monitoring (2012-today)
The Busan HLM (2011) called for the creation of a selective and relevant set of indicators to monitor progress against the commitments agreed in Busan, alongside with those set out in Paris and in Accra (2015 targets)
Monitoring coordinated by the OECD-UNDP Joint Support Team of the newly established GPEDC, following a “global-light, country-focused approach”
Establishment of the GPEDC monitoring framework in 2012 (PBIG)
monitoring round  Progress Report for the Mexico HLM (2014)
monitoring round  Progress Report for the Kenya HLM (2016)
Future of the GPEDC monitoring
Increase relevance of the framework to the post 2015 context (incl. SSC)
Revisions to the monitoring framework (incl. targets) to be agreed at the HLM2
Building on experience from the round + MAG recommendations

3. Purpose of the monitoring framework
Tracking progress in the implementation of effective development co-operation commitments
Capture behaviour change: “how” are stakeholders engaging in development co-operation? Are they being effective?
Complementary with the SDGs, which monitor “what” results and outcomes of development co-operation
Why is it important?
Support mutual accountability – encourage all stakeholders to match commitments with action
Stimulate broad-based dialogue and learning
Serve as a reference point for country-level frameworks

4. Monitoring approach – “Global-light, country-focused” (1/2)
Country leadership
Data collection and validation is:
led by developing country governments, in consultation with development partners (providers, CSOs, private sector)
grounded in existing national processes when possible (e.g. data collection through country-level aid management systems, monitoring process embedded in mutual accountability frameworks )
The monitoring exercise and its results spark multi-stakeholder policy dialogue and accountability at the country level.
Global monitoring framework
The OECD-UNDP JST:
coordinates the aggregation of existing data (country-sourced data and globally-sourced data)
provides continued support to countries through operational guidance and a help desk
produces global Progress Reports produced to inform ministerial- level meetings
Progress is monitored on a rolling basis ( , )

5. Monitoring approach – “Global-light, country-focused” (2/2)
How can countries ground the monitoring of EDC in their own processes?
Example of Mozambique
Effective mutual accountability dialogue mechanisms with providers in place
M&E of targets for individual providers and sector reviews
A series of MoUs on general budget support to strengthen an integrated approach to mutual accountability, which define how monitoring, dialogue and accountability procedures should be aligned with the country’s planning, budgeting and monitoring cycles
Example of Rwanda
Donor Performance Assessment Framework (DPAF)
A joint tool for the monitoring of donor performance (volume and quality)
Instrumental in incentivising behavioural changes of development actors
Currently being revised to expand to development financing beyond ODA (e.g. to private foundations)
Development Assistance Database (DAD)
Currently being integrated into the Financial Management Information & System:
Better integration of ODA on budget
Capture ODA in-flows to INGOs in country
Pilot data from IATI standard

6. Paris Survey indicators Strong country demand and good track record
What is monitored?
10 indicators, grounded in EDC principles
Paris Survey indicators
Strong country demand and good track record
NEW Busan indicators
Mutual accountability
Predictability
Aid on budget
Use of PFM/procurement systems
Aid untying
Gender
Results
Public-Private Dialogue
CSO enabling environment
Transparency
Baseline
For indicators from the Paris Survey, baseline = 2010
For new indicators, baseline = 2013/14 (Gender & Transparency) or 2015/16 (Results, PPD, CSO EE)

7. What is monitored? 10 indicators

8. How to engage in the global monitoring exercise?
Participation is voluntary: all developing countries are invited to participate.
Co-Chairs letter to the Ministers
So far 64 countries have expressed interest
Countries are encourage to report on the whole monitoring package (i.e. on 7 country-sourced indicators)
A “National co-ordinator” is in charge of the process
Building on country-level efforts to enhance mutual accountability framework linked to national development results framework/strategy, etc.
Inclusiveness: development partners in country play an important role in supporting the process
Who? Country offices of co-operation providers, CSOs, the private sector
How? contributing their information where relevant and engaging in multi-stakeholder dialogue on EDC

9. তোমাকে ধন্যবাদ Gracias Thank you Dankjewel Hvala Merci Asante مننه
ありがとう
Gracias
Thank you
Dankjewel
Hvala
Merci
Asante
مننه
شكرا
Obrigado
Salamat