1. Group 10 Rachel Martin David Mount Leah Strickman Emma Wendt
Choosing Atrium Lighting in the new Graduate School of Business Knight Management Center
Group 10
Rachel Martin
David Mount
Leah Strickman
Emma Wendt

2. Overview Existing atrium decision process
Atrium lighting as project focus
Recommended decision process: MACDADI
Organizations
Goals
Preferences
Options
Analysis
Value
Innovations

3. We speculate atrium selection is problematic Midterm: Pre-data
Atrium Current State Narrative
No Stakeholder
goals up front
Few options provided
Stakeholders engaged late; act as designers
Midterm: Pre-data

4. We focus our project on lighting Actual atrium selection is even more problematic than we suspected
Atrium Current State Narrative
Atrium appears in the architect’s plans
We changed our project to a more detailed decision
The Atrium Lighting Decision
Midterm: Post-data

5. Narrator model from architect
Thorough atrium lighting design process,
but stakeholders not included
Architect’s Atrium Lighting Decision

6. Our Future State Narrative
Stakeholders matter
Atrium Lighting Decision Future State Narrative
Narrator link

7. MACDADI Model Organizations
Students
Faculty
Staff
Designers
Donors
Owners
Community
Stakeholders
Owner
Stakeholders matter
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

8. MACDADI Model Clarify goals to clarify design decision
Promotion of Academic Excellence
Inspire
Visual Wow Factor
Aesthetic
Appropriate Lighting Level
Functionality
Library Feel
Accessibility
Study Space
Economic Responsibility
Ease to Construct
Proven Design
Time To Build
Time to Design
Code Compliant
Environmental Sustainability
LEED Platinum
Get Daylighting Credit
Comfort
Innovative
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

9. MACDADI Model Weighting preferences shows
economics and owners matter most
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value 9

10. MACDADI Model Designers generate 3 options
0 Sawtoothes
3 Sawtoothes
6 Sawtoothes
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

11. MACDADI Model Analysis - Outlined ratings for 3 goals
Promotion of Academic Excellence
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

12. MACDADI Model Analysis – 6 and 3 panels similarly and better
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value 12

13. MACDADI Model Value
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Weights * Value 13

14. Innovation
Weighted the opinions of different stakeholders to acknowledge the relative importance of each
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value

15. Weight stakeholders – owners and economics become more important
Innovation
Weight stakeholders – owners and economics become more important
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value 15

16. Weight stakeholders – final design doesn’t change
Innovation
Weight stakeholders – final design doesn’t change
MACDADI Model → Organizations * Goals * Preferences * Options * Analysis * Value 16

17. Summary Consider stakeholders Choose 6-sawtooth option
Weight stakeholder preferences
Recognize economics can still be most important goal
Choose 6-sawtooth option