Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Analysis of Fastenal Quoting Practices

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Analysis of Fastenal Quoting Practices"— Presentation transcript:

1 Analysis of Fastenal Quoting Practices
Kadin Browne, Caleb Griesbach, Derek Klein, Jackson Schuette

2 Table of Contents Introduction Data Exploration Classification Models
Problem Overview Our Approach Data Exploration Classification Models Logistic Regression Business Value Future Actions

3 Introduction

4 Our Problem: Quote Success
Searching for better quoting practices Increase price on "for sure" quotes Increase quote success rate Two questions What are the major drivers? Can we make a practical, real time, model? Acquired large dataset, includes Quote success(invoiced)/failure Product & product classification Multitude of prices

5 Our Approach Data Exploration Classification Models Business Value
Find patterns and interesting information about quoting Classification Models Classification Logistic Regression Business Value Key drivers New quote guidance

6 Data Exploration

7 What Drives Success? Branches are one component to the quoting process. Average success = 66.7% Our hypothesis More customers → More chances of failure More quotes → More chances of failure

8 Most branches have ≈80% Success Rate

9 Maximum and Minimum Branch 1032 Branch 1184 Success Percentage = 99.22% Total Quotes = 384 Number of Customers = 2 Success Percentage = 2.49% Total Quotes = 1,206 Number of Customers = 21 Does this imply success percentage is related to the number of total quotes or customers?

10 Low # Quotes → Better Success % Low # Customers → Better Success %

11 Branch Success Continued
Number of quotes and customers influences success rate Average success is 66.7% Most branches have ≈80% success What is skewing the average? Some branches are larger More quotes FMI Agreements

12 FMI Agreements FMI Agreements allow Fastenal to automatically quote a customer when their inventory gets low No FMI Success Percentage = 66.2% FMI Success Percentage = 71.39% FMI Agreements may improve success percent

13 Sale Prices of Quotes Compared Price with Cost
Should get linear relationship Want to know how cost affects price Expect Failed price > Success price

14 Successful quote’s sale price > Failed quote’s sale price
Production Cost = Selling Price Successful quote’s sale price > Failed quote’s sale price

15 Successful Quotes Failed Quotes Production Cost = Selling Price

16 Analysis Cost > 40.6 Cost < 40.6
Failed quotes price < Successful quotes price Unusual Reminder: High Cost products fail Cost < 40.6 Failed quotes price > Successful quotes price Expected

17 Classification Models

18 Classification Method
Classification Idea Quote A Quote B Quote C Quote D Classification Method Quote A: Y Quote B: N Quote C: N Quote D: Y Model Assessment

19 Logistic Regression (LR)
Simple & powerful Original Quotes LR Outputs Predict Success Quote C: 0.89 Quote A Quote E: 0.73 Quote B LR Cutoff: 0.673 Quote C Quote A: 0.61 Predict Failure Quote D Quote D: 0.42 Quote E Quote B: 0.29 True Success True Failure

20 Actual Classification
Model Assessment Accuracy Model Classification Actual Classification How good is our model? Confusion Matrix

21 First Model: Product Centric
Data: One Product FMI Agreement Quantity Unit Price Logistic Regression Results Accuracy Significance of Variables

22 Results No significance of variables

23 Summary What went wrong? How can we fix it?
Could only use a few variables: Quantity, Cost, FMI Agreement No significance of variables How can we fix it?

24 Feature Engineering Discount = Wholesale – UnitPrice
TotalDiscount = (Quantity)(Discount) PercentProfit= UnitPrice−CostOfGoods CostOfGoods PercentMarkUp= Wholesale−StandardCost StandardCost

25 New Model: Feature Engineering
Data: Full Set Original Variables Feature Engineered Variables Logistic Regression Results Accuracy Significance of Variables

26 Item Weight, FMI-Agreement, & Total Discount are very significant!
Results Item Weight, FMI-Agreement, & Total Discount are very significant!

27 Accuracy of New Model Model Accuracy is greater than the No Information Rate Majority of Confidence Interval above No Information Rate Model still isn’t that great

28 Business Value

29 Business Value Drivers of success
Positive coefficients increase probability Negative coefficients decrease probability Magnitude is the degree of effect on probability

30 Simulating New Quotes Model Change Variables 100 bolts $5
20% chance it succeeds Probability Change Variables

31 Simulating New Quotes Model 100 bolts $2 80% chance it succeeds
Probability

32 Future Work

33 Possible Future Actions
Continue logistic regression (LR) on more data LR on data by Category ID, Quantity, price intervals Parameter analysis:  Linear adjustment to significant variables Compare new success rate to old success rate Utilize different methods: Decision Trees Random Forests Boosting

34 Acknowledgements PIC Math is a program of the Mathematical Association of America (MAA) and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM). Support is provided by the National Science Foundation NSF grant DMS Advisors: Dr. Song Chen and Dr. Chad Vidden University of Wisconsin – La Crosse Department of Mathematics & Statistics Industry Partner: Fastenal Industrial Liaison: Brian Keeling

35 Questions?


Download ppt "Analysis of Fastenal Quoting Practices"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google