Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMargaretMargaret Scott Modified over 6 years ago
1
High Rock Lake, Yadkin River Basin Scoping Monitoring Study
Michelle Woolfolk, NC DWQ May 24, 2005 Stakeholder Meeting
2
What I will cover…. Highlights from the data review document
Highlights from the scoping study
4
Counties Alexander Alleghany Caldwell Davidson Davie Forsyth Guilford
Iredell Rowan Stokes Surry Watauga Wilkes Yadkin Watershed area: 3,973 sqm
5
Data and model review DENR Water Quality Data Review for High Rock Lake, North Carolina. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. Available on website
6
Previous investigations
USEPA 1973. Study concluded that the lake is highly eutrophic, but because of short residence time, the lake resembles a slow-moving river. Phosphorus indicated as limiting nutrient. NCDEM 1974. NC DEM 1975. Focus on point source discharges. Dense algal growth and high turbidity noted.
7
Previous investigations, cont.
UNC High Rock Lake is clearly a nutrient rich aquatic system that …develops substantial algal populations. NC DEM Monitoring to support water quality modeling. Chlorophyll a concentrations violated the state standard (40 ug/L) numerous times. Largest algal populations observed in the embayment of Town Creek.
8
Previous investigations, cont.
APGI Nutrient enrichment with elevated chlorophyll a noted. Elevated turbidity in upper portions of the lake were noted, as well as violations of cyanide and mercury criteria. Thermal stratification noted as “not common in the reservoir and most occurrences of a thermocline are weak and not persistent.”
9
Previous modeling NC DWQ BATHTUB model
Model provided a reasonable fit to total phosphorus. Model over-predicted total nitrogen and severely underestimated chlorophyll a. Errors in input files Mis-representation of vertical mixing Tributaries loads highly uncertain Hydraulic residence time too short
10
2 9 10 1 3 11 4 6 12 5 NCDWQ (1997) High Rock Lake Water Quality Model Segmentation 13 15 8 14 7
11
Exploratory data analysis
Correlation analysis Focus on summer season (June – September) Includes nutrient concentrations, Secchi depth, and temperature. Very little of the variability in chlorophyll a concentration in High Rock Lake is explained by nutrient concentrations. Light explains a relatively more variability in chlorophyll a. Mixing dynamics are probably important
12
Exploratory data analysis, cont.
Non-parametric analysis (CART) “Total phosphorus, nonalgal turbidity, and Secchi depth were identified as statistically significant variables in predicting chlorophyll a concentrations…”
13
Data needs identified In the period leading up to TMDL development, continue regular ambient monitoring, particularly in light of the loss of chlorophyll a data between 1997 and (SS) If possible, obtain direct experimental evidence on the ratio of organic carbon and ash-free dry weight to chlorophyll a for different algal groups and different seasons.
14
Data needs, cont. High frequency sampling of algae (preferably weekly or better) for at least one calibration and one validation growing season. Major tributary water quality should be sampled with at least the same frequency (i.e., weekly or better) during intensive studies.
15
Data needs, cont. Information on the volatile solids content of TSS.
In-lake measurements of total BOD or CBOD should be obtained, and SOD measurements should be considered. (SS) Maintain Econet station at Salisbury (weather station) Temporal issues (SS)
16
Modeling issues identified
Problem identification and DQOs Significant longitudinal gradients in observed water quality. Model should incorporate a full hydrodynamic simulation with coupled water quality simulation. Full eutrophication simulation that accounts for nutrient effects, settling, and the interaction between turbidity/light and algal growth.
17
Modeling issues, cont. The DO/BOD cycle should be included in the model. Model should be open source and in the public domain Appropriate tools: WASP5/EUTRO5 EFDC CE-QUAL-W2
18
Purpose of Scoping Study
Gather data and information on parameters needed for modeling but not included in ambient monitoring Get data for the late fall season to determine if critical conditions might vary from traditional summer Build validation year dataset
19
Scoping study March through December 2005
Lake and watershed monitoring Relies on existing USGS gages*** Less intensive than the TMDL study (but more intensive than standard ambient monitoring)
20
Scoping study includes…
Continuous temperature monitoring Algal analyses (density and dominant species) SOD and nutrient flux Monthly monitoring of chemical parameters in-lake and at selected watershed locations
21
Thermister deployment
22
Thermister buoy
23
(April – May, 2005)
25
Thanks for your attention!!
Questions or comments? Contact Michelle Woolfolk NCDWQ – Modeling & TMDL Unit ext 505
26
Next steps Complete scoping study (DWQ)
Formation of Technical Advisory Committee Stakeholder process? Goal setting
27
Technical advisory committee?
Purpose: meet with DWQ during the formation of tools to discuss issues and make recommendations Members Four to five members of the general stakeholder group, DWQ Modeling & TMDL Unit, DWQ Intensive Survey Unit, DWQ QA Officer
28
TAC actions Review data at the end of the year (i.e., 2005) for completeness Was the correct data obtained, quantity and quality? Was the additional data and information obtained? Were there any logistical problems with monitoring? Develop, with DWQ, the TMDL field study plan, with goals and budget Develop, with DWQ, the modeling plan, with goals and budget Methods and numeric targets
29
TAC, cont. Time Commitment Member background:
June 2005 – May 2006, 8-10 meetings Member background: Water quality, chemistry, statistics, water/wastewater treatment, water resources, environmental science
30
General stakeholder process
Locally run. In other areas, the Council of Governments or discharger association has taken on the coordination role Develop meeting schedule Decide on how to interface with the TAC
31
Next general meeting Date: July 27, 2005 Location: TBD
Duration: 1 hr, 30 minutes Agenda: Review project goals, modify as needed and prioritize, Finalize TAC membership Immediately following: 1st TAC meeting
32
Project goals What are the goals of this chlorophyll-a and turbidity TMDL project? Develop approvable TMDLs for High Rock Lake. Estimate the relative point and nonpoint source contributions to nutrient loads Provide individual NPDES wastewater allocations Support the development of nonpoint source management strategies to reduce nutrient and sediment loading
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.