1. Data collection process Mapping of Broadband Services in Europe First Stakeholder Consultation Workshop 7th June Eric Delannoy Mission France Très Haut Débit – Ministry of the Economy, Industry and Digital Affairs

2. Presentation of test data Proposals for data collection process
Agenda
Presentation of test data
Proposals for data collection process

3. Test data from the national mapping exercise
Operators
CEREMA
Network data collection
Geolocated address database
Bandwidth assessment for each address
Broadband map creation
Web publishing
Maps & stats
Test data provided : household BB coverage
For each NUTS-3 area
For each municipality

4. Test data provided – format
Households broadband coverage per NUTS-3 area
NUTS-3
d_c_f_1
d_c_f_2
d_c_f_3
d_c_f_4
d_c_f_5
d_c_1
d_c_2 … 01
100%
90%
79%
44%
27%
99%
83% 02
82%
69%
22% 1% 03
86%
75%
30% 5%
85% 04
98%
84%
68%
26% 05
66%
28% 3% 06
93%
55%
92% 07
81%
65%
24% 08
80%
70%
29% 4% 09
71% 10
72% 11
74% 12
21%
With:
d : DSL, c : Cable and f : FTTH with all possible combinations
1 : BB eligibility, 2 : >3Mbps downlink speed, 3 : >8 Mbps, 4 : >30 Mbps and 5 : >100 Mbps

5. Tuv analysis on provided data set
NUTS / GRID ID
QoS Type
Technology Internet Access Provider
Value type
Value subtype
Values ID 1
Group: All/Unknown
Availability Households
Infrastructure
Min 2
Group: Wired
Availability Inhabitants
Speed Down
Max 3
Group: Wireless
Availability Area
Speed Up
Average
Group: Mobile
Availability Addresses
Latency
Median
Group: NGA
Availability Roads
Jitter
Group 1
Single: DSL/ADSL
Take-up
Packet loss
Group 2
Single: CATV
Measurement Only
Data Usage
Group 3
Single: FTTC/VDSL
Measurement Comparison
Group 4
Single: FTTH/B
Group 5
Single: UMTS/3G
Number of measurements
Single: LTE/4G
Number of Operators (physical)
Single: 2G
Number of Operators (virtual)
Single: WiMAX/WLAN
Names of Operators (physical)
Single: Satellite
Names of Operators (virtual)

6. Other information CSV Table format
Data updated quarterly, based on voluntary provision of data by operators
Data available at the municipality level
Data to be available at the address level depending on an agreement with operators
Availability of WiMax coverage and plan to add UMTS and LTE coverage by the end of 2016

7. Presentation of test data Proposals for data collection process
Agenda
Presentation of test data
Proposals for data collection process

8. Adaptation of data provided to the EC platform
The data provided by the Mission Très Haut Débit can be adapted to fit the requirements of the EC platform:
Add of NUTS-3 ID
Adaptation of coverage statistics with groups of speed chosen for the EC platform
Making of statistics using the 1km grid proposed for the EC platform
Possibility to provide additional format
Need for a clarification of speeds chosen for the platform in order to adapt the national mapping workflow

9. Provision of meta-data
One the most valuable benefit of the EC mapping exercise is to provide precise and comparable data between member states and NUTS-3 areas
To enable this, the user should have the information on the precision of the data and how the numbers are calculated
It does not always make sense to compare data without the same level of precision
Proposal for meta-data
Resolution of raw data (i.e. the number of geolocated points at the national level for each technologies)
How incomplete data is handled?
Which assumptions are made during the process of calculating the values?

10. Clarification of technology items
It could be useful to provide precise definition for each technology in order to avoid misunderstanding or double counting.
Example of useful clarification:
Should VDSL from the MDF be included in FTTC-VDSL or only VDSL from Cabinets?
Is HFC considered as FTTB or CATV or both, as the HFC-node is often located in buildings basements?
Is a copper line with
less than 30Mbps downlink speed
but connected to a VDSL enabled cabinet
considered as FTTC-VDSL or NGA?