1. Fourth Annual Rules Summit
NYSCOTFCC
McGirk’s – October 16, 2016

2. Welcome to All!
NINETEEN of all of our local chapters are represented here today!
I thank you all for your interest, concern for our athletes, and enthusiasm to come here.
Special thanks again to Brian Staiger for finding this site, Steve Baxter for the setup, the Southern Tier Association, and to our State Executive Board – especially to Jim McCaul, Jan O’Shea, and Bob Headwell for creating the idea back in 2012 to hold this Rules Summit.

3. Why this NOW?
The incorporation of 2017 rules into our indoor season requires that we know about these rule changes earlier than the January NFHS Interpretation Conference Call.
Clarifying an early misinterpretation is easier than waiting until March.
We will have a much more efficient meeting at the Indoor Meet with much happier attendees.

4. New York State as “Pioneers”
In 2012 when we adopted to use the New NFHS Rules as our Indoor Rules guide as well, we became “Pioneers” of a sort.
We were the “testing lab” of new NFHS rules changes to see if they were workable and effective. We reported our findings to the NFHS Rules Committee all during the indoor season.
This year, Illinois and Iowa have adopted the 2017 rules for their indoor seasons as well

5. Our “pioneer” Rules Summit in 2012
McGirk’s Irish Pub
Our “pioneer” Rules Summit in 2012

6. Today’s Agenda New Rule Changes for 2017
Intention of the changes & comments on the rule revisions
NFHS Points of Emphasis for 2017
Clarifications via Q & A of existing rules
Local situations, local needs
How can we help one another?
Clinics and training ideas to “take home” with you to your membership
A good lunch, fellowship & safe trip home

7. 2017 NFHS Rule Changes
Not many rule changes, but a significant number of revisions when you read them
There is a VERY significant reorganization in the rule book with the consolidation of Rules 6 & 7 into a New Rule 6 titled “Field Events”
Rule 6 is thoroughly indexed in the margins to help you quickly find both general and event-specific rules
The rest of the changes/revisions involve either clarifications of existing rules or risk minimization.

8. The NFHS Track & Field Rules Committee

9. NFHS Track & Field Rules Changes and Revisions for 2017

10. 3-2-4u NEW Games Committee “Also may” Responsibility
“Providing liquids during competition”
Rationale: It was felt that this should be the responsibility of meet organization and not that of individual coaches.

11. CHANGE – and 3-4-7
The signal at the beginning of the last lap in individual races now occurs in race distances of TWO (2) laps ore more.
Rationale: Signifying with a bell with one lap remaining in the 800 alerts timers, place judges and FAT operators on notice, builds excitement for spectators and is a positive signal for the competitors. Updates to current trends in the sport (same as NCAA)
INDOORS?? – Let’s decide that TODAY before we leave!

12. Rule CLARIFICATION
Clarifies that a runner is disqualified by the starter when charged with a false start.
While this has always been an assumed power of the starter, it has not actually been clearly written in the rule book since Now it is clearly in the rules.

13. Clarification
Clarifies the mechanics used to confirm the result of an attempt when flags are not utilized by calling “fair” or “foul”.
I said it last year – Flags are the future trend in the rules. I would start using them more & more.

14. 4-3-1b(5) and 8-6-1b(4) --REVISION
Allows the placement of one American flag on each item of uniform apparel and deletes NOTE restricting flag placement
The old “NOTE” that was in there was a contradiction of the written rule.

15. NEW g
Adds receiving physical aid by any other person during a race to the list of unfair acts of assisting a competitor
RATIONALE: The rule should include coverage of the actions of competitors and nonparticipating team members as well as assistance/aid from other parties.

16. NEW 4-6-5d and 8-7e
A participant assisting an injured/ill competitor when an appropriate health-care professional is not available is no longer disqualified.
Rationale: Although uncommon that appropriate health-care professionals are not available to assist an injured/ill competitor, there may be occasions when a competitor is needing assistance to confirm his/her health status or to arrive to a location for health care. Should another competitor assist, such competitor shall not be disqualified, only the assisted competitor shall be disqualified for not completing the race unassisted. Reorganize rule to indicate why competitor is disqualified.

17. REVISION 5-1-3
Establishes the location and spacing of cones, when used, in the absence of a curb
Delineates how and where to place cones in the absence of curbing if desired.
Rationale: In the absence of a curb, the placement of cones ensures the competitors run the prescribed race distance.

18. 5-6-4 REVISION
Deletes the requirement of separating competitors from the same team if they were to be in the same heat in the first round of competition.
Rationale: The results of running events are based on head-to-head competition and all contestants should have the opportunity to compete in the heat earned by the athlete’s place and/or qualifying times. Consistent with current trends in the sport.

19. 5-7-3 REVISION
Competitors in distance races (800m and greater distances) use only a standing start, remaining motionless for the start without their hand(s) touching the ground.
Rationale: Consistent with current trends in the sport (USATF/IAAF rules). Reinforces the concept that distance races (800, 1600 or 3200) only use a standing start.

20. Rule 6 & 7 – NOW RULE 6!
Reorganizes rules 6 and 7 into one rule “Field Events” to avoid duplicity in the rules, remove unnecessary language, be more concise in the presentation of the events rules and create a section on general rules for all field events.
Rationale: To combine all of the field event rules into one rule thereby eliminating the possibility of making a change in the throws and missing it in the jumps. Also eliminates duplication of definitions in the rules and unnecessary language.

21. REVISION and old 7-2-5
Warm-ups in a field event shall not take place until the venue is declared open by the meet director and required supervision is in place.
Once competition begins, except as scheduled, competitors shall not use venues or implements associated with the competition for warm-ups.

22. Rationale: For purposes of risk management, warm-ups in a field event may not take place until the venue is declared open and required supervision is in place. For further risk minimization for athletes, spectators, and officials involved in the event, athletes should be prohibited from picking up an implement and doing turns while other competitors are completing their throws or using the runway during the competition unless they have been called for their attempt.

23. REVISION
Includes how trials are recorded when a legal implement breaks during competition within the rule and deletes as a NOTE.
Rationale: Clarifies how trials are recorded when a legal implement breaks during competition. More appropriate to list within rule rather than as a NOTE to the rule.

24. REVISION e
Clarifies that it is a foul if a competitor touches the top or end of the stopboard before leaving the circle.
Rationale: The top or sides of the stopboard are outside of the ring and touching outside of the ring is not compliant with leaving from the back half of the circle and is a foul.

25. Why this “clarification”?
When competitors step on the top of the stopboard or kick the side of it, it usually was to signal a deliberate foul so that the attempt would not be measured.
There were officials who refused to acknowledge these “deliberate” fouls if there was a legal throw up to when the implement hit the ground. They measured the attempts anyway.
It is now definitely a FOUL throw by clarification of the rule.

26. REVISION old NOW 7-2-1
Special events which may be included in the order of competition shall be conducted under USATF Youth event rules unless state association policy determines otherwise.
Rationale: The NFHS rules allow several special events to be added to the order of events but no specific event rules are written. By utilizing USATF Youth event rules there are standard rules which are age appropriate. However, state associations may already have appropriate rules in place and this should be an option stated in the rules.

27. The Effect in New York ? . . .
2000/3000 Steeplechase, Pentathlon, Race Walking are already following these rules because of lack of NFHS written rules
Because there are no USATF Youth rules in the Indoor Weight Throw, the NYSPHSAA opted to use the NCAA rules for that event.
Again – We are “Pioneers”!

28. REVISION Old 9-1-3b Now 8-1-3b
Clarifies that directional sign posts can be used with or in place of directional flags in cross country.
Rationale: Clarifies that either directional flags and/or sign posts shall be used in cross country.
It is permission to do what has been done already (common sense)

29. How can anybody get lost on an XC course now?

30. REVISION New and
Clarifies where to place the wind gauge in the horizontal jumps when there are multiple takeoff boards used in the competition.
Rationale: Officials need guidance as to where to place the wind gauge when there are multiple takeoff boards. As the rule is currently written, it implies either having to move the wind gauge between jumps or having a second gauge. As the better jumpers will most likely use the farther board, it is logical to have the wind gauge at the location furthest from the pit.

31. Major Editorial Changes

32. Major Editorial Changes
3-4-4 Clarifies the referee has the sole authority for ruling on irregularities not covered within the rules.
This was clearly in the rules back in the 1970’s, disappeared somehow in editorial shufflings, and has now returned!

33. Major Editorial Changes – Vertical Jumps
6-4-8 Clarifies the three consecutive passed heights must take place before the competitor attempts a warm-up jump.
Clarifies when the two minutes of warm-up jumps are permitted when a competitor has passed three consecutive heights with no attempted jump.
In BOTH of these it clearly states that the competitor SHALL attempt a jump at the height existing when they took their warm-up jump/approaches.

34. 2017 Points of Emphasis 1. Sportsmanship
2. Heat Acclimatization and Preventing Heat Illness
3. Use of Rubber Discus in Practice and Competition
4. NFHS Track and Field Uniform Regulations

35. As to Changes & Revisions …