Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
FP7 – EuroBroadMap Analysis of Question B
EUROBROADMAP PROJECT - FP7-SHS Visions of Europe in the World Claude GRASLAND (CNRS) Timothée GIRAUD (CIST) Laurent BEAUGUITTE (CNRS)
2
A Worldwide survey 18 Countries 43 Cities 9341 Students Arts Business
Politics Engineer Health Social Science
3
The concepts of knowledge and asymetry
A. GENERAL FRAMEWORK EUROBROADMAP PROJECT - FP7-SHS Visions of Europe in the World The concepts of knowledge and asymetry
5
General framework for analysis
DO NOT MENTION … WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN … WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN … LIVE OR HAS LIVED IN ..
6
(1) Analysis of countries quoted
DO NOT MENTION … WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN … WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN … LIVE OR HAS LIVED IN ..
7
(2) Analysis of countries knowledge or ignorance
DO NOT MENTION … WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN … WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN … LIVE OR HAS LIVED IN ..
8
(3) Analysis of countries appreciation by origin
DO NOT MENTION … WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN … WOULD NOT LIKE TO LIVE IN … LIVE OR HAS LIVED IN ..
9
Knowledge: Example of Tunisia
10
Knowledge: Comments on Tunisia
France is quoted in 1st rank by 79% of Tunisian, which is more than usual (51%) USA are quoted in 2nd rank by 53% of Tunisian, which is a bit less than usual (60%) Neighbours countries are over-mentionned ( Algeria, Lybia, Egypt, Italy …) Iraq and Iran are less mentionned than usual (which means less negatively …) Etc…
11
Knowledge: general results
12
Knowledge: General results
13
Asymmetry: Example of Tunisia
14
Asymmetry: Comments on Tunisia
Some countries are more positive for Tunisian : ex. France (+0.95 instead of +0.67) Some countries are less positive for Tunisian : ex. UK (+0.31 instead of +0.77) Some countries are more negative for Tunisian : ex. Morocco (-0.36 instead of -0.05) Some countries are less negative for Tunisian : ex. Iran (-0.56 instead of -0.95) Some countries reverse from negative to positive : ex. Turkey (+0.83 instead of -0.37) or Syria (-0.95 to +0.57)
15
Asymmetry: General results
16
Asymmetry: General results
17
K & A : Example of Tunisia
18
K & A: Example of Tunisia
19
Legend of the maps In which countries would you like to live in the near future ? The SIZE of circles should be proportional to the degree of KNOWLEDGE by students. The COLOUR of circles should be related to ASYMMETRY. With opposite colours for LIKE and DISLIKE.
20
WORLD MAPS (Tunisia)
21
ZOOM MAPS (Tunisia)
22
ANAMORPHOSIS From … The SIZE of countries should be proportional to the degree of KNOWLEDGE by students. The COLOUR of countries should be related to ASYMMETRY. With opposite colours for LIKE and DISLIKE. … to
23
ANAMORPHOSIS (Tunisia)
24
B. COMPARISON OF MENTAL MAPS OF STUDENTS
EUROBROADMAP PROJECT - FP7-SHS Visions of Europe in the World Empirical analysis of states where students would like or not like to live
25
OLD MEMBER STATES
26
France
27
Belgium
28
Sweden
29
Portugal
30
NEW MEMBER STATES
31
Malta
32
Hungary
33
Romania
34
EASTERN NEIGHBORHOOD
35
Moldova
36
Turkey
37
Azerbaïdjan
38
Russia
39
SOUTHERN NEIGHBORHOOD
40
Egypt
41
Tunisia
42
Senegal
43
Cameroon
44
BIG EMERGING COUNTRIES
45
Brazil
46
India
47
China
48
SYNTHESIS ???
49
Typology of world states
50
Correlation between positive visions (LIKE)
Cameroon & Senegal Egypt & Tunisia CHINA INDIA EUROPEAN UNION RUSSIA BRAZIL
51
Correlation between negative visions (NOT LIKE)
Cameroon & Senegal CHINA BRAZIL Turkey WESTERN EUROPE Egypt & Tunisia EASTERN EUROPE & RUSSIA INDIA
52
C. MODELIZATION OF STUDENTS PREFERENCES
EUROBROADMAP PROJECT - FP7-SHS Visions of Europe in the World Which factors can explain the countries where students would LIKE to live ?
53
Qualitative assumptions
Because they have heard of the country Because it is rich Because it is open to migration Because it is not far Because it has historical linkage Because it has a common language …
54
Quantitative formalisation
55
(1) Size effect Hypothesis: BIG countries are more attractive than SMALL countries. 83 2
56
(1) Size effect H1 is true for all countries with very high level of significance
57
(2) Economic effect Hypothesis: RICH countries are more attractive than POOR countries. 59 20
58
(2) Economic effect H2 is true for all countries with very high level of significance
59
(3) Density effect (migratory policy)
Hypothesis: EMPTY countries (open to migration) are more attractive than FULL countries (closed to migration) 48 16
60
(3) Density effect H3 is true for all countries but significant only for 6 out of 18
61
(4) Distance effect Hypothesis: NEAR countries are more attractive than REMOTE countries 188 47
62
(4) Distance effect H5 is true for all countries but not very significant for France and not at all for China
63
(5) Neighbourhood effect
Hypothesis: CONTIGUOUS countries are more attractive than NON CONTIGUOUS 15 2
64
(5) Neighbourhood effect
H5 is true only for France and Azerbaïdjan. The reverse hypothesis is true for Tunisia, Egypt, Cameroon and Russia.
65
(6) Language effect Hypothesis: countries with COMMON LANGUAGE are more attractive than others 11 3
66
(6) Language effect H6 is true and significant for the majority of countries. But it is sometime not significant and is reversed in the case of Azerbaijan
67
(7) Historical effect Hypothesis: countries with former COLONIAL RELATIONS are more attractive than others 59 188
68
(7) Historical effect H6 is true for some countries (India, Malta, Tunisia …) but reversed for others (Azerbaïdjan, Cameroon, Senegal).
69
D. FURTHER STEPS … EUROBROADMAP PROJECT - FP7-SHS
Visions of Europe in the World
70
1. Benchmarking States / Cities
71
1. Benchmarking States / Cities
72
2. Countries focus (ex. USA)
73
2. Countries focus (ex.USA)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.